The Stealth Juror Will Be Exposed

[MarcATL]

It's in the defendant's favor, to get just 1 juror to hang it, and 12 to convict, as it should be....

But it really bothers me that everyone is saying he can't get a fair jury in NYC.... I'm telling you, first hand, from experience that when a juror is sworn and picked, it is a huge huge huge responsibility on their shoulders to do what is fair and just....even if you despise the defendant.... You listen to the evidence and defense, and want to do the right thing....whatever your decision of guilty or not guilty, you don't make that decision based on your "feelings" about the defendant.... It's on the facts presented in the court room!

There is a slight concern on what a Cult member would do because I've never encountered that when serving on a jury, BUT I would guess that they too, will listen to and see the evidence presented and do the right thing....!

Yes, some times, the system fails, but 99% of the time, it does not.

Trump cultists are incapable of being fair, that's why they project that sentiment onto everyone else.

 

[Care4all]

Aren't you the naive one! Tell me, Care...do you think the jury in the OJ trial based their decision on the facts or on their "feelings"?

Of course not, Man With a Plan!

The OJ trial is covered by this statement of mine:

Yes, some times, the system fails, but 99% of the time, it does not.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Let's be honest here, folks! There is a REASON why all of these trials are based where they are! Democrats are conducting "lawfare" against their leading political opponent and they've chosen those locations because they know the jury pools there are heavily slanted towards their party! It is what it is. So they'll get a guilty decision with their biased juries and their biased judges...it will be appealed and it will be overturned on appeal. Democrats already know that but this is all about the election and they don't care what happens AFTER November...right now this is all about getting some kind of conviction BEFORE the election so they can use that to get Joe Biden reelected!

 

[Man With A Plan]

Of course not, Man With a Plan!

The OJ trial is covered by this statement of mine:

But you think those liberal juries are going to ignore their feelings towards Trump? Like James and Engeron did in THAT trial? Like I said before...aren't you the naive one!

 

[MarcATL]

But you think those liberal juries are going to ignore their feelings towards Trump? Like James and Engeron did in THAT trial? Like I said before...aren't you the naive one!

Are any of the Bidens guilty of commiting crimes?

 

[kyzr]

To be clear, you believe Trump didn't have an affair with a porn star, that he didn't pay her to be quiet about it, or that those payments were purposely mischaracterized as a business expense?

I mean, we'll all see the evidence that is presented at trial. I'm genuinely curious if any amount of evidence would cause you to rethink your assumption he is innocent.

None of that is a felony. he may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Here is an expert opinion that Bragg has no case.

The Trump Trial in Manhattan is an Indictment of the New York Legal System

Below is my column in the New York Post on the start of the Trump trial today in New York. I have long been critical of the case as a clear example of the weaponization of the criminal justice syst…

jonathanturley.org

Now Bragg is bringing a case that has taken years to develop and millions of dollars in litigation costs for all parties. That is all over a crime from before the 2016 election that is a misdemeanor under state law that had already expired under the statute of limitations.

 

[kyzr]

Retribution huh? I didn't expect PRINCIPLES from you people.

So more non-answers to questions...
1. What is the underlying crime that Trump tried to coverup with the hush-money?
2. Turnabout is fair-play. If Republicans get lawfared in blue states, democrats should get lawfared in red states. Equal treatment (or mistreatment) is PRINCIPLED.

 

[Hollie]

Retribution huh? I didn't expect PRINCIPLES from you people.

Lecture us about PRINCIPLES when a statute of limitations had expired and desperate, leftist hacks revise the law to allow their Jihad to proceed targeting an individual.

 

[Seymour Flops]

To be clear, you believe Trump didn't have an affair with a porn star,

Both Trump and the porn star have denied it. Who is your credible witness to say that it happened?

that he didn't pay her to be quiet about it,

His attorney arranged a one hundred percent legal non-disclosure agreement to prevent her from making money selling the story to the National Enquirer.

or that those payments were purposely mischaracterized as a business expense?

I notice you switched to the passive voice. Who called them a business expense?

I mean, we'll all see the evidence that is presented at trial. I'm genuinely curious if any amount of evidence would cause you to rethink your assumption he is innocent.

Yes, but it would need to be reliable evidence of an actual crime from a credible source.

I don’t know what could change my mind about Trump being targeted for selective prosecution by the opposition party. Maybe if they had prosecuted Biden for providing access to top secret documents to his Crackhead sons Foreign house guests.

 

[Lisa558]

None of that is a felony. he may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Here is an expert opinion that Bragg has no case.

The Trump Trial in Manhattan is an Indictment of the New York Legal System

Below is my column in the New York Post on the start of the Trump trial today in New York. I have long been critical of the case as a clear example of the weaponization of the criminal justice syst…

jonathanturley.org

Now Bragg is bringing a case that has taken years to develop and millions of dollars in litigation costs for all parties. That is all over a crime from before the 2016 election that is a misdemeanor under state law that had already expired under the statute of limitations.

Yup. Bragg works hard to get TRUE felonies for violent thugs reduced to misdemeanors - and then works twice as hard to get a nothing misdemeanor past the statute of limitations charged as some major felony because….Trump.

 

[Mac1958]

To be clear, you believe Trump didn't have an affair with a porn star, that he didn't pay her to be quiet about it, or that those payments were purposely mischaracterized as a business expense?

I mean, we'll all see the evidence that is presented at trial. I'm genuinely curious if any amount of evidence would cause you to rethink your assumption he is innocent.

They truly believe that he is a brilliant, law-abiding, loving, innocent, patriotic Christian man who is as honest as the day is long.

That bizarre fantasy is foundational to their adoration of him, and not subject to any debate, period. NO amount or quality of evidence will convince them otherwise.

Once I realized that, a lot more began to make sense about them, and I stopped trying to convince any of them of anything.

 

[Care4all]

But you think those liberal juries are going to ignore their feelings towards Trump? Like James and Engeron did in THAT trial? Like I said before...aren't you the naive one!

You swear under oath, to do so.

Are you actually speaking about yourself, if you were chosen as a juror? That you believe that you could not honor your oath of using only evidence presented in the trial, in your decision making process? Thus you are projecting what you would do or not do, on to other jurors?

 

[Lisa558]

They truly believe that he is a brilliant, law-abiding, loving, patriotic Christian man who is as honest as the day is long.

That bizarre fantasy is foundational to their adoration of him, and not subject to any debate, period. NO amount or quality of evidence will convince them otherwise.

Once I realized that, a lot more began to make sense about them, and I stopped trying to convince any of them of anything.

How obnoxious, talking about “they” and “them” when we are right here. You are the most arrogant poster in this forum.

And no…we do not ”adore” him, or worship him, or whatever. We recognize he did very well as our president, presiding over a strong economy, no new wars, low inflation, energy surplus, progress to Middle East peace, and a fairly well-controlled border.

We also recognize that these nothing misdemeanor cases are the Democrats using government officials to eliminate their #1 political rival from the race. Most Americans agree, and that’s why Trump’s support goes up after each witch-hunt trial.

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump is a common criminal who conned Americans into putting him in Office.

Never again!

You could easily be describing Barack Hussein.

 

[Billiejeens]

How obnoxious, talking about “they” and “them” when we are right here. You are the most arrogant poster in this forum.

And no…we do not ”adore” him, or worship him, or whatever. We recognize he did very well as our president, presiding over a strong economy, no new wars, low inflation, energy surplus, progress to Middle East peace, and a fairly well-controlled border.

We also recognize that these nothing misdemeanor cases are the Democrats using government officials to eliminate their #1 political rival from the race. Most Americans agree, and that’s why Trump’s support goes up after each witch-hunt trial.

"You are the most arrogant poster in this forum."

With literally no reason.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The jury in the Trump trial should all acquit because Trump is innocent.

I just tampered with the jury.

The judge should dismiss the case immediately because Trump is innocent.

I just tried to sway the judge.


There is a knock at my door…brb...

 

[BluesLegend]

For what? Alvin won't say what the crime is either. Banana Republic of NY.
So when it happens to democrats don't scream like stuck pigs.

It's a Dem election interference scheme. A case so laughable it's not even a witch hunt, just something to force Trump off the campaign trail. I hope everyone is having a good look at how corrupt and nasty Democrats are.

 

[Winco]

Watching you cry after Trump's reelected is going to be epic.

I'm waiting for the "Stolllen" election part III.

Leftists invent such silly conspiracy theories

What a twisted world you live within.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The jury in the Trump trial should all acquit because Trump is innocent.

I just tampered with the jury.

The judge should dismiss the case immediately because Trump is innocent.

I just tried to sway the judge.


There is a knock at my door…brb...

Or they could just find him guilty and we proceed to summary judgement. We all know he's guilty.
Way less cost to the taxpayer and we could finally be rid of the Orange Roughy.

 

[Hollie]

Or they could just find him guilty and we proceed to summary judgement. We all know he's guilty.
Way less cost to the taxpayer and we could finally be rid of the Orange Roughy.

Something of the attitudes that seem to define the typical Dem / Socialist. Not a hint of honesty, integrity or a single concern for rule of law.