The truth about CO2 and climate change

[konradv]

Scientists disagree. BTW, the US is seeing record cold temps this year, and the ice caps are growing. Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo. ?

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo, you should study up on the real science and not just post whatever fits your bias. Maybe you won't look like such a fool in the future,

 

[Kosh]

the ice caps are growing.

You have to laugh, don't you?

Yep have to laugh..

It is like trying to measure climate during a warming phase and blaming humans for it..

However if you want to see proof that the ice caps are growing here is some real science to show you what is happening.

 

[Kosh]

Scientists disagree. BTW, the US is seeing record cold temps this year, and the ice caps are growing. Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo. ?

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo, you should study up on the real scince and not jusdt post whatever fits your bias

Man these far left/AGW cult members are irony impaired..

 

[Redfish]

the ice caps are growing.

You have to laugh, don't you?

yes, posting bullshit does make one laugh.

here's some truth for ya. With pictures, not bullshit graphs.

Global Cooling Arctic Ice Cap Grows 60 Percent In A Year NASA PHOTO - International Science Times

 

[konradv]

Scientists disagree with Plimer is correct. After all, all the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

in the 1970s those same groups said the earth was going into a new ice age.

Someone with a truly critical mind would wonder what made them change their minds so fast. Never mind that the notion wasn't as widespread as you'd have us believe. The easy answer is it was because of the money, but many were saying it long before the grant money got big.

 

[konradv]

Scientists disagree. BTW, the US is seeing record cold temps this year, and the ice caps are growing. Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo. ?

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo, you should study up on the real scinece and not just post whatever fits your bias

Man these far left/AGW cult members are irony impaired..

Do you even know what irony means? t certainly doesn't involve reporting on weather, when we're talking about climate.

 

[Redfish]

Scientists disagree. BTW, the US is seeing record cold temps this year, and the ice caps are growing. Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo. ?

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo, you should study up on the real science and not just post whatever fits your bias. Maybe you won't look like such a fool in the future,

LOL, speaking of posting bias and looking like a fool^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

run for the mountains the sea is rising and nothing will be left of the US except the rocky mountains. Run, chicken little, run.

 

[Kosh]

Scientists disagree with Plimer is correct. After all, all the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

in the 1970s those same groups said the earth was going into a new ice age.

Someone with a truly critical mind would wonder what made them change their minds so fast. Never mind that the notion wasn't as widespread as you'd have us believe. The easy answer is it was because of the money, but many were saying it long before the grant money got big.

YEs and now they are so invested in this that they must continue their gravy train ride and continue to feed their egos.

But then again the far left/AGW cult will never acknowledge such things as then, they would have to admit to being wrong!

 

[Kosh]

Scientists disagree. BTW, the US is seeing record cold temps this year, and the ice caps are growing. Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo. ?

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo, you should study up on the real scinece and not just post whatever fits your bias

Man these far left/AGW cult members are irony impaired..

Do you even know what irony means? t certainly doesn't involve reporting on weather, when we're talking about climate.

Another far left/AGW cult poster showing that they are truly irony impaired.

 

[Redfish]

Scientists disagree. BTW, the US is seeing record cold temps this year, and the ice caps are growing. Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo. ?

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo, you should study up on the real scinece and not just post whatever fits your bias

Man these far left/AGW cult members are irony impaired..

Do you even know what irony means? t certainly doesn't involve reporting on weather, when we're talking about climate.

Thats rich, you guys post graphs covering 20 or 30 years and claim they prove a trend for a planet that is billions of years old----------thats the irony, idiot.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Plimer lies a lot.

Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere - Scientific American

This argument that human-caused carbon emissions are merely a drop in the bucket compared to greenhouse gases generated by volcanoes has been making its way around the rumor mill for years. And while it may sound plausible, the science just doesn’t back it up.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.

How many volcanoes are there in the world?
The exact number of volcanoes is unknown. It also depends on the definition of a "volcano": for instance, there are "volcanic fields" that comprise hundreds of individual eruption centers (such as conder cones, maars, shield volcanoes) that are all relataed to the same magma chamber and that may or not be counted as a single "volcano".
There are probably millions of volcanoes that have been active during the whole lifespan of the earth. During the past 10,000 years, there are about 1500 volcanoes on land that are known to have have been active, while the even larger number of submarine volcanoes is unknown. At present, there are about 600 volcanoes that have had known eruptions during recorded history, while about 50-70 volcanoes are active (erupting) each year. At any given time, there is an average of about 20 volcanoes that are erupting.
For more details, look at what the Smithsonian Institution says about this question.

How many volcanoes are there in the world

 

[konradv]

Thats rich, you guys post graphs covering 20 or 30 years and claim they prove a trend for a planet that is billions of years old----------thats the irony, idiot.

You're ignoring the time element. You can't compare things that happened over tens of thousands to millions of years with what's happened over the last 200.

 

[BlindBoo]

Plimer lies a lot.

Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere - Scientific American

This argument that human-caused carbon emissions are merely a drop in the bucket compared to greenhouse gases generated by volcanoes has been making its way around the rumor mill for years. And while it may sound plausible, the science just doesn’t back it up.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.

Scientists disagree. BTW, the US is seeing record cold temps this year, and the ice caps are growing. Sooooooooooooooooooooooooo. ?

Winter comes early as snow cold pummel upper Midwest - CNN.com

Residents in the northern United States can thank a whopping Pacific tropical cyclone for the wintry blast.

Super Typhoon Nuri was akin to Hurricane Katrina and Superstorm Sandy rolled into one. It had the strength of a category 5 hurricane, CNN's Sater said.

It is the strongest Northern Pacific post-tropical cyclone on record, the NWS said.

Its remnants explosively intensified up north over Alaska's Aleutian Islands last week and plowed into cold air, which added violent energy to the storm. It was similar to what happened with Superstorm Sandy in the Atlantic two years ago and earned the storm the little-used "bomb cyclone" moniker.

The hybrid storm rammed into the jet stream, causing it to whip south, dragging Arctic air down with it.


Sea Ice? Sure it grows every November.

Daily Arctic Sea Ice Maps

 

[Redfish]

Thats rich, you guys post graphs covering 20 or 30 years and claim they prove a trend for a planet that is billions of years old----------thats the irony, idiot.

You're ignoring the time element. You can't compare things that happened over tens of thousands to millions of years with what's happened over the last 200.

OMG, amazingly ignorant. The climate of our planet has been changing for millions of years and will be changing millions of years from now. The actions of humans have never had anything to do with it.

 

[Kosh]

Thats rich, you guys post graphs covering 20 or 30 years and claim they prove a trend for a planet that is billions of years old----------thats the irony, idiot.

You're ignoring the time element. You can't compare things that happened over tens of thousands to millions of years with what's happened over the last 200.

Oh my the far left/AGW cult once again shows that they do care about real science just pushing their religious agenda.

It is often reported that the temperature of the earth is higher the past 20 years than it has ever been in history. This is simply not true, nor has it ever been. Hundreds of research studies using ice cores, pollen sedimentation, tree rings, etc. have shown that there were dozens of periods in the past 11,000 years (the Holocene period) that earth's temperature was warmer than it is today. Earth's temperature was very much warmer at least four times during the current interglacial period.

 

[konradv]

Thats rich, you guys post graphs covering 20 or 30 years and claim they prove a trend for a planet that is billions of years old----------thats the irony, idiot.

You're ignoring the time element. You can't compare things that happened over tens of thousands to millions of years with what's happened over the last 200.

OMG, amazingly ignorant. The climate of our planet has been changing for millions of years and will be changing millions of years from now. The actions of humans have never had anything to do with it.

You're logic impaired, aren't you? You can't compare the present to the past, if underlying conditions have changed, like humans emitting more CO2 in DAYS than all the volcanoes on earth do in a normal year.

 

[Kosh]

Thats rich, you guys post graphs covering 20 or 30 years and claim they prove a trend for a planet that is billions of years old----------thats the irony, idiot.

You're ignoring the time element. You can't compare things that happened over tens of thousands to millions of years with what's happened over the last 200.

OMG, amazingly ignorant. The climate of our planet has been changing for millions of years and will be changing millions of years from now. The actions of humans have never had anything to do with it.

You're logic impaired, aren't you? You can't compare the present to the past, if underlying conditions have changed, like humans emitting more CO2 in DAYS than all the volcanoes on earth do in a normal year.

More proof that the far left/AGW cult is irony impaired..

 

[BlindBoo]

Scientists disagree with Plimer is correct. After all, all the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

in the 1970s those same groups said the earth was going into a new ice age.

I do not understand why you libs can't understand the difference between pollution and climate change. Pollution is bad, everyone agrees. When you try to make a false connection between pollution and climate change you hurt the drive to eliminate pollution.

the only explanation that is possible is that liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

No, there was never a consensus about an new Ice Age. That is a bold face lie you keep repeating based on a Newsweek article.

What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s

 

[Kosh]

Scientists disagree with Plimer is correct. After all, all the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

in the 1970s those same groups said the earth was going into a new ice age.

I do not understand why you libs can't understand the difference between pollution and climate change. Pollution is bad, everyone agrees. When you try to make a false connection between pollution and climate change you hurt the drive to eliminate pollution.

the only explanation that is possible is that liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

No, there was never a consensus about an new Ice Age. That is a bold face lie you keep repeating based on a Newsweek article.

What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s

Then the far left/AGW cult uses a far left/AGW cult blog site for their "facts".

More debunked information being posted as fact..

The far left/AGW cult continues to prove that they would much rather see the world burn than admit they are wrong!

 

[Redfish]

Scientists disagree with Plimer is correct. After all, all the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities have policy statements that say AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.

in the 1970s those same groups said the earth was going into a new ice age.

I do not understand why you libs can't understand the difference between pollution and climate change. Pollution is bad, everyone agrees. When you try to make a false connection between pollution and climate change you hurt the drive to eliminate pollution.

the only explanation that is possible is that liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

No, there was never a consensus about an new Ice Age. That is a bold face lie you keep repeating based on a Newsweek article.

What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s

I never said that there was a consensus, just as today there is no consensus.