Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dang 69000 post and you haven't got one right yet.Let us keep in mind that the OP is someone who is delighted that a crazy mom killed family members and a CPS employee.
Self serving opinion piece but lets go to the 'summary'
Bottom line: reserving adoption for a husband and a wife who are married to each other is the best kind of “discrimination” there is
There are 100,000 children each year in the United States available for adoption. Virtually all of them there because they were abandoned by their biological parents. 33,000 will wait 3 or more years to be adopted. Thousands age out of the system without any parents at all.
These upstanding citizens think all of that is preferable to allowing a single mom or a single dad to adopt. Or a gay couple. Or a straight unmarried couple.
That is not science- the OP is just a morality play that doesn't give a damn about the children who need a family- the children abandoned by their heterosexual families
What a load of shit!!!
A mother. Plain and simple. Doing what ANY REAL mother would do.Tell us more how you celebrated a CPS employee (a women with two children) was gunned down by a druggie, alcoholic crazy woman.Ahhh the usual cultural marxist hate mongers come out to feast.
Still trying to rationalize the state kidnapping kids are we kid.Oh well..Your problem not mine.A mother. Plain and simple. Doing what ANY REAL mother would do.Tell us more how you celebrated a CPS employee (a women with two children) was gunned down by a druggie, alcoholic crazy woman.Ahhh the usual cultural marxist hate mongers come out to feast.
Any murderous asshole that happens to also have birthed multiple children- i.e. what you call a real mother- what we will be calling a "Lifer with no access ever to her children"
I was adopted in Feb 1950, therefore I have credibility.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
There you go again about the op. The topic is not about the op.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
There you go again about the op. The topic is not about the op.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
Is this the only tactic the left has?
Still trying to rationalize the state kidnapping kids are we kid.Oh well..Your problem not mine.A mother. Plain and simple. Doing what ANY REAL mother would do.Tell us more how you celebrated a CPS employee (a women with two children) was gunned down by a druggie, alcoholic crazy woman.Ahhh the usual cultural marxist hate mongers come out to feast.
Any murderous asshole that happens to also have birthed multiple children- i.e. what you call a real mother- what we will be calling a "Lifer with no access ever to her children"
Compared to children raised by their married biological parents ("intact biological family," or IBF), children of homosexual parents:
Proclaiming it wrong proves nothing. Cite reasons. He articulated a position and you have failed to provide any reason it ahould be questioned.There you go again about the op. The topic is not about the op.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
Is this the only tactic the left has?
The term OP is also an abreviation for the Opening Post.
That is what is being referred to as lacking credibility.
Proclaiming it wrong proves nothing. Cite reasons. He articulated a position and you have failed to provide any reason it ahould be questioned.There you go again about the op. The topic is not about the op.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
Is this the only tactic the left has?
The term OP is also an abreviation for the Opening Post.
That is what is being referred to as lacking credibility.
I was adopted in Feb 1950, therefore I have credibility.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
the AFA is right
That is OPINION.Proclaiming it wrong proves nothing. Cite reasons. He articulated a position and you have failed to provide any reason it ahould be questioned.There you go again about the op. The topic is not about the op.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
Is this the only tactic the left has?
The term OP is also an abreviation for the Opening Post.
That is what is being referred to as lacking credibility.
I did cite a reason. The AFA is biased.
Sign up for adult remedial reading classes at your local community college.
Proclaiming it wrong proves nothing. Cite reasons. He articulated a position and you have failed to provide any reason it ahould be questioned.There you go again about the op. The topic is not about the op.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
Is this the only tactic the left has?
The term OP is also an abreviation for the Opening Post.
That is what is being referred to as lacking credibility.
Compared to children from intact biological families (IBF), children of lesbian mothers:
Nothing but ridiculous lies from the right.
No, it's the usual ignorance, fear, and hate from the reprehensible right.Ahhh the usual cultural marxist hate mongers come out to feast.
It's obviously in the link. Simply saying the source is biased does not negate the content. If it's wrong point out why.Proclaiming it wrong proves nothing. Cite reasons. He articulated a position and you have failed to provide any reason it ahould be questioned.There you go again about the op. The topic is not about the op.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
Is this the only tactic the left has?
The term OP is also an abreviation for the Opening Post.
That is what is being referred to as lacking credibility.
What was the position he 'articulated'? Here is his quote again:
The Uncensored Truth About Homosexual Adoption
Nothing but facts.
That is OPINION.Proclaiming it wrong proves nothing. Cite reasons. He articulated a position and you have failed to provide any reason it ahould be questioned.There you go again about the op. The topic is not about the op.The AFA is biased and therefore the OP lacks any shred of credibility on this topic.
Is this the only tactic the left has?
The term OP is also an abreviation for the Opening Post.
That is what is being referred to as lacking credibility.
I did cite a reason. The AFA is biased.
Sign up for adult remedial reading classes at your local community college.
If i believe the sun to be purple rather than yellow does that prove me correct?