CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,226
- 69,205
- 2,330
Are deminimus, incremental increases in the atmospheric trace element CO2 solely responsible for instantaneous, cataclysmic and irreversible changes in Earth's climate?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No comment from the Decline Hiders?
Id have a tad more respect for the right if theyd admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the One World Government, hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.
Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. ..... Sheesh, what does it take to get through?
Id have a tad more respect for the right if theyd admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the One World Government, hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.
Actually, my entire argument is founded in science. Care to examine some laws of physics and do some math?
Well, except for the "science" that's being used to prove AGW -- the "science" that's distorted, massaged, cherry-picked, and promoted with a bastardized peer-review process.Id have a tad more respect for the right if theyd admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science...
Well, if every proposed "solution" to AGW didn't involve recommendation of all that, perhaps there'd be less opposition to it....and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the One World Government, hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.
If they're conservatives, why do you believe them? Conservatives are anti-science, right? People of faith are irrational, right?Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. He believes marriage is between a man and a woman. He backs a strong military. He almost always votes Republican and admires Ronald Reagan.
Emanuel is also a highly regarded professor of atmospheric science at MIT. And based on his work on hurricanes and the research of his peers, Emanuel has concluded that the scientific data show a powerful link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
Conservative scientists take on climate change deniers | Deseret News
Texas Tech atmospheric scientist Katharine Hayhoe is an evangelical Christian who travels widely talking to conservative audiences and wrote a book with her husband, a pastor and former climate change denier, explaining climate change to skeptics.
A physicist by training, John Cook is an evangelical Christian who runs the website skepticalscience.com, which seeks to debunk climate change deniers' arguments.
Barry Bickmore is a Mormon, a professor of geochemistry at Brigham Young University and the blogger behind Anti-Climate Change Extremism in Utah, where he recently rebuked Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) for his climate views and posted editorials mentioning his Republican affiliation.
------------------------------------------------------
You gotta admit, it's pretty fucking hilarious these "right wing conservative scientists" think they still belong to the Republican Party.'
HELLO!
That party doesn't want you. No academics. No "elites". No "smarts". NOT WANTED in the Republican Party. Sheesh, what does it take to get through?
Are deminimus, incremental increases in the atmospheric trace element CO2 solely responsible for instantaneous, cataclysmic and irreversible changes in Earth's climate?
If they're conservatives, why do you believe them? Conservatives are anti-science, right? People of faith are irrational, right?Emanuel sees himself as a conservative. He believes marriage is between a man and a woman. He backs a strong military. He almost always votes Republican and admires Ronald Reagan.
Emanuel is also a highly regarded professor of atmospheric science at MIT. And based on his work on hurricanes and the research of his peers, Emanuel has concluded that the scientific data show a powerful link between greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
Conservative scientists take on climate change deniers | Deseret News
Texas Tech atmospheric scientist Katharine Hayhoe is an evangelical Christian who travels widely talking to conservative audiences and wrote a book with her husband, a pastor and former climate change denier, explaining climate change to skeptics.
A physicist by training, John Cook is an evangelical Christian who runs the website skepticalscience.com, which seeks to debunk climate change deniers' arguments.
Barry Bickmore is a Mormon, a professor of geochemistry at Brigham Young University and the blogger behind Anti-Climate Change Extremism in Utah, where he recently rebuked Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) for his climate views and posted editorials mentioning his Republican affiliation.
------------------------------------------------------
You gotta admit, it's pretty fucking hilarious these "right wing conservative scientists" think they still belong to the Republican Party.'
HELLO!
That party doesn't want you. No academics. No "elites". No "smarts". NOT WANTED in the Republican Party. Sheesh, what does it take to get through?
Poor dean. He desperately wants to have it both ways, but he can't.
Id have a tad more respect for the right if theyd admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the One World Government, hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.
Actually, my entire argument is founded in science. Care to examine some laws of physics and do some math?
Are deminimus, incremental increases in the atmospheric trace element CO2 solely responsible for instantaneous, cataclysmic and irreversible changes in Earth's climate?
Wow, what a loaded question!
First, according to dictionary.com, there is no such word as "deminimus".
Secondly, the use of the word "solely"
Third, the use of the word "instantaneous"
Fourth, "irreversible"
It doesn't get more loaded that that!
How about you create a liberal strawman, put words in his mouth that no liberal has every spoken, then declare that the bunk that you made up is what all "liberals" believe and dare them to support it.
Typical sleazy wingnut tactics!
Id have a tad more respect for the right if theyd admit that their opposition to GCC has nothing to do with science and everything to do with conservative dogma: an irrational fear of the One World Government, hatred for the UN and international treaties, and the blind rejection of any kind of business or economic regulation.
If you weren't such a braindead moron, you'd know about dean's irrational hatred of and bigotry against conservatives.Daveboy, Dean is quoting real scientists who happen to be conservatives. What you wingnuts are stating is that virtually all the scientists in the world, from every kind of political organization that exists, are in on some sort of conspiracy. A regular tinfoil hat brigade is what you are.