🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The World Health Organization is now our one world government

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
56,242
56,881

Most probably don't know, thanks to our wonderful media, but the G 20 have met and declared that WHO will be overseeing a mandatory digital ID that will require vaccines in order to "move around"

There will be no public discussions on this, no voting on the issue, no, it will be imposed on you.
 
These proposed international digital health passes could be used to restrict and monitor the movement of individuals or different groups of people by simply changing the criteria, thereby enabling governments and corporations to coerce human behaviour by, for instance, denying access to infrastructure or services.

The joint declaration follows recommendations from Indonesia’s Minister of Health Budi Gunadi Sadikin made during a Business 20 (B20) panel held ahead of the G20 summit.

Sadikin said,“Let’s have a digital health certificate acknowledged by WHO — if you have been vaccinated or tested properly — then you can move around.”

The vague requirement of “tested properly” would presumably be squarely at the discretion of the WHO. Sadikin added that the benefit of a global WHO-standardised vaccine passport would be to facilitate international travel and that G20 countries have agreed to such a global digital health certificate. The idea is to introduce the certificate as a revision to the IHR framework at the next World Health Assembly, scheduled for May 2023 in Geneva, Switzerland.

One has to ask why President Ramaphosa would agree to this and commit South Africa to the “digital transformation” envisaged in the joint declaration when the vehement opposition to the implementation of vaccine passports in SA appeared to be considered by government and sufficient to shut down talk thereof during Covid.

Paragraph 19 states, “We support the work of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) that will draft and negotiate a legally binding instrument that should contain both legally binding and non-legally binding elements to strengthen pandemic PPR and the working group on the International Health Regulations that will consider amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) mindful that the decision will be made by World Health Assembly.”

A majority of WHO member states on July 21, during a meeting of WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), agreed to pursue a legally binding pandemic instrument that will contain “both legally binding as well as non-legally binding elements.”

The new or revised “pandemic treaty” will build on the existing international framework for global pandemic response, the WHO’s IHR, considered a binding instrument of international law.

As stated above, the IHR framework already allows the WHO director-general to declare a public health emergency in any country, without the consent of that country’s government, though the framework requires the two sides to first attempt to reach an agreement.

As part of the process of revising the IHR, the INB will meet again in December and will deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly of the WHO in 2023.

Paragraph 20 states: “In this regard, we welcome the establishment of a new Financial Intermediary Fund for Pandemic PPR (the ‘Pandemic Fund’) hosted by the World Bank.”

The G20 health ministers have agreed to establish a pandemic fund. The fund will be commonly used to fix the health system and close the budget gap for the following five years, based on how the COVID-19 pandemic has been handled in the previous two years.

The World Bank will manage the fund to help low- and middle-income countries prevent and address future pandemics, drawing commitments from more than 20 country donors, of which South Africa is one, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, among others. More pledges are expected.

Members “acknowledge the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) technical expertise and central coordination role in this endeavour, which reflects its leadership role in the global health architecture.” All this points to the centralisation of pandemic management and, considering the WHO’s failed COVID-19 response, following its central coordination is foreboding.

Paragraph 23 further states: “We support the WHO mRNA Vaccine Technology Transfer hub.”

This hub, the only one in the world so far, is in South Africa. Unless actual mRNA trials will be conducted in respect of new mRNA technology, in light of what we do know about mRNA Covid-19 vaccine harms, this hub may do more harm than good.
 

Most probably don't know, thanks to our wonderful media, but the G 20 have met and declared that WHO will be overseeing a mandatory digital ID that will require vaccines in order to "move around"

There will be no public discussions on this, no voting on the issue, no, it will be imposed on you.
Why would we vote on it. This isn't a democracy, it's a constitutional Republic.

We vote for politicians, they make the decisions. Don't like it? Vote for someone else.
 
Why would we vote on it. This isn't a democracy, it's a constitutional Republic.

We vote for politicians, they make the decisions. Don't like it? Vote for someone else.
Your politicians will throw up their hands and say, "It is out of our hands, do as WHO tells you so you can have certain freedoms they say you can have"

Easy Peazy Lemon Squeezy.
 
Why would we vote on it. This isn't a democracy, it's a constitutional Republic.

We vote for politicians, they make the decisions. Don't like it? Vote for someone else.

That post makes no real sense or even has much to do with the topic at hand.

You also act like the current administration actually does what's best for the American people. It does what the world economic forum wants.

This is the same administration that released a test of digital currency with major us banks right before Thanksgiving when no one would notice.


This is the same administration that tried to force vaccine mandates on everyone.



The same administration that says our border is secure meanwhile everyone sees the millions of illegals crossing over.

The same administration that wants to investigate Elon musk and has referred to him as a white supremacist simply because he is promoting free speech for everyone, even people who don't like him.


And so on. Voting has nothing to do with right now because we're stuck with him for 2 more years.
 
Your politicians will throw up their hands and say, "It is out of our hands, do as WHO tells you so you can have certain freedoms they say you can have"

Easy Peazy Lemon Squeezy.
Then don't vote for them.
 
That post makes no real sense or even has much to do with the topic at hand.

Yes it does. We vote people in office to make decisions. We are a constitutional Republic. Why would we then vote on issues they decide on. That is a democratic government.

Ask uncensored2008 if you don't believe me. He is the one who educated me.

You also act like the current administration actually does what's best for the American people. It does what the world economic forum wants.

The administration does what the voters want or they won't vote for them again.

This is the same administration that released a test of digital currency with major us banks right before Thanksgiving when no one would notice.


This is the same administration that tried to force vaccine mandates on everyone.



The same administration that says our border is secure meanwhile everyone sees the millions of illegals crossing over.

The same administration that wants to investigate Elon musk and has referred to him as a white supremacist simply because he is promoting free speech for everyone, even people who don't like him.


And so on. Voting has nothing to do with right now because we're stuck with him for 2 more years.

Not sure what your list of greivences has to do with my post.

Feel free to create, let's see...1, 2, 3...yes three different posts addressing those issues and I will join up for some great discussion.
 
Why would we vote on it. This isn't a democracy, it's a constitutional Republic.

We vote for politicians, they make the decisions. Don't like it? Vote for someone else.
If it is not obvious Biden and many others are beholden to the globalists than you are not paying attention. I know it is hard to believe. And it took a long time for me to get to 100%. It just grew gradually over time.
 
If it is not obvious Biden and many others are beholden to the globalists than you are not paying attention. I know it is hard to believe. And it took a long time for me to get to 100%. It just grew gradually over time.
No. It's not obvious.
 
You just keep believing that we are still a Constitutional Republic. That ended a long time ago.
Because of people like you who, if you get your way, will mandate to vote on things individually rather then let our public servants do it.

Then we will be a democracy.
 
Because of people like you who, if you get your way, will mandate to vote on things individually rather then let our public servants do it.

Then we will be a democracy.
Checks and balances are compromised with the Federal Reserve Act, the 16th and 17th Amendments. Progs are pushing to remove another check and Balance...the Electoral College. We now vote for people who provide the goodies and give us mot favorite citizen privileges.
 
Checks and balances are compromised with the Federal Reserve Act, the 16th and 17th Amendments. Progs are pushing to remove another check and Balance...the Electoral College. We now vote for people who provide the goodies and give us mot favorite citizen privileges.
I don't agree with removing the electorial college.

Most Repubs support congressional term limits, Dems too for that matter, and that violates the constitution...glass houses and all.
 
I don't agree with removing the electorial college.

Most Repubs support congressional term limits, Dems too for that matter, and that violates the constitution...glass houses and all.
80% of Americans want term limits, but since the Swamp does not value democracy that they cannot manipulate to their favor, they just ignore them.
 
I flipped the WHO the bird and told them to pound sand.
No, they will tell you to pound sand as they deny you the ability to travel if you don't jump through their hoops

And just like WHO will be dictating to you how you live your life, the EU is telling the farmers in the Netherlands they can't grow as much food as they forcibly close down 3000 farms, sending an already inflationary economy into much higher inflation around the world since they are the second leading food producer in the world


The world organizations have taken over your country and your life, and all without a vote or gun shot.

And they will do this all in the name of "health" and the "environment"
 

Forum List

Back
Top