There is no evidence Joe Biden took a bribe.

[Godboy]

There is no evidence Joe Biden took a bribe.

I haven't seen it. I'm seen some stuff y'all think is proof, but, when the rubber hits the road, it's not. You know the old saying..... Put up or shut up! Show me whatcha got.

www.usmessageboard.com

Rebuttle to the above:
I retitled this discussion because the OP titled it to be top posted to further his tactical propaganda. Use this one instead to debate the subject matter as it's rightfully titled.
There was always proof of Bidens quid pro Joes, therefore the other title and discussion should have been disallowed.
1) Joe himself openly discussed his Ukraine quid pro quo on broadcast TV
It was over the same guys he claimed to not know about or ever discuss with nor meet (all three lies).
2) Obama himself told agents Bidens corruption was an issue, it's why he would not endorse him.
3)Bobolinski first hand accounted Biden's Corruption- evidence
4) The lap top had tons of evidence
5) the FBI had evidence
6)Delaware courts had evidence
7)Ukraine had evidence including the tapes
8)they went after Giuliani and defamed him over his evidence and made it a crime for Trump to explore the Biden Corruption, so much so that the left committed obstruction many times to keep what the former topic OP claims is no evidence.
You don't commit crimes to cover up non crimes, they do it to cover up to stay out of jail.
In short the formwr title OP is either come overing up for Biden and accepting treason or he's proven the sources of media he has are helping and supporting Biden's treason. Hence why they call CNN China's news network.

There is a shitload of evidence, but the Dems will tell you that unless you have a straight up video tape of Biden committing a murder, then you have no proof of anything on him. They know there is a lot of evidence, they are just praying that Biden isnt going to be convicted, but that seems extremely unrealistic. There is never this much smoke around a person and then nothing happens to them. This kind of evidence always leads to conviction.

 

[JoeB131]

Rebuttle to the above:
I retitled this discussion because the OP titled it to be top posted to further his tactical propaganda. Use this one instead to debate the subject matter as it's rightfully titled.
There was always proof of Bidens quid pro Joes, therefore the other title and discussion should have been disallowed.
1) Joe himself openly discussed his Ukraine quid pro quo on broadcast TV
It was over the same guys he claimed to not know about or ever discuss with nor meet (all three lies).

He said on open TV that he demanded that Shonkin be removed before the US, EU and IMF sent any more aid, because the guy's deputies were caught with houses full of diamonds and foreign currency. Even Republicans like Ron Johnson and Mark Kirk called for Shonkin's removal.

2) Obama himself told agents Bidens corruption was an issue, it's why he would not endorse him.

Wrong. Obama followed the historical precedent of NOT endorsing a candidate in the primaries, just like Reagan did in 1988. When Joe got the nomination, Obama got behind him.

3)Bobolinski first hand accounted Biden's Corruption- evidence

Boblinski's word is useless.

4) The lap top had tons of evidence

None of which is admissible in court, because it's been through too many hands.

5) the FBI had evidence

What evidence/

6)Delaware courts had evidence

What evidence?

7)Ukraine had evidence including the tapes

You mean the evidence Trump tried to shake them down for.

8)they went after Giuliani and defamed him over his evidence and made it a crime for Trump to explore the Biden Corruption, so much so that the left committed obstruction many times to keep what the former topic OP claims is no evidence.

This would be the same Giuliani who tried to sell pardons in the last days of the Trump administration?

You don't commit crimes to cover up non crimes, they do it to cover up to stay out of jail.
In short the formwr title OP is either come overing up for Biden and accepting treason or he's proven the sources of media he has are helping and supporting Biden's treason. Hence why they call CNN China's news network.

Well, you call it that, because you people are kind of nuts... Meanwhile, the "news sources" you guys like are thing like RT (Russia Times), which really are owned by the Russians, or the Epoch Times, which is owned by the Fulan Gong Cult, or the Washington Times, which is owned by the Moonies.

 

[1srelluc]

He said on open TV that he demanded that Shonkin be removed before the US, EU and IMF sent any more aid, because the guy's deputies were caught with houses full of diamonds and foreign currency. Even Republicans like Ron Johnson and Mark Kirk called for Shonkin's removal.



Wrong. Obama followed the historical precedent of NOT endorsing a candidate in the primaries, just like Reagan did in 1988. When Joe got the nomination, Obama got behind him.


Boblinski's word is useless.


None of which is admissible in court, because it's been through too many hands.


What evidence/

What evidence?

You mean the evidence Trump tried to shake them down for.



This would be the same Giuliani who tried to sell pardons in the last days of the Trump administration?



Well, you call it that, because you people are kind of nuts... Meanwhile, the "news sources" you guys like are thing like RT (Russia Times), which really are owned by the Russians, or the Epoch Times, which is owned by the Fulan Gong Cult, or the Washington Times, which is owned by the Moonies.

LOL....Yet you regale us all with articles from WaPo, Politico, or Huffington Post.

 

[EMH]

His tax returns are public record, dipshit.

And fail to include $50k per month from Hunter, that Hunter paid...

 

[JoeB131]

LOL....Yet you regale us all with articles from WaPo, Politico, or Huffington Post.

Again, better than a right wing paper owned by a cult.

 

[1srelluc]

Again, better than a right wing paper owned by a cult.

What's wrong, did I hit you too close to home?

 

[JoeB131]

What's wrong, did I hit you too close to home?

NO, I am sure you are very proud to get your "news" from whacky Asian cults.

I'm not sure why.

I mean, sure the Fulan Gong has those sexy dancers,

but they are a little crazy.

(Seriously, ^^^^ this is the symbol of the Fulan Gong cult).

 

[1srelluc]

NO, I am sure you are very proud to get your "news" from whacky Asian cults.

I'm not sure why.

I mean, sure the Fulan Gong has those sexy dancers,

View attachment 795031

but they are a little crazy.

View attachment 795032

(Seriously, ^^^^ this is the symbol of the Fulan Gong cult).

Why do you hate Native Americans?

The Use of the Swastika Symbol in American Indian Art

One of the most popular designs incorporated into American Indian art during the tourist era— approximately 1890 to 1940—was the swastika symbol, common to most indigenous peoples the world over and used throughout time. Copper bookends by Morris Robinson (Hopi). The swastika design indicates...

messieraz.com

 

[Moonglow]

There is no evidence Joe Biden took a bribe.

I haven't seen it. I'm seen some stuff y'all think is proof, but, when the rubber hits the road, it's not. You know the old saying..... Put up or shut up! Show me whatcha got.

www.usmessageboard.com

Rebuttle to the above:
I retitled this discussion because the OP titled it to be top posted to further his tactical propaganda. Use this one instead to debate the subject matter as it's rightfully titled.
There was always proof of Bidens quid pro Joes, therefore the other title and discussion should have been disallowed.
1) Joe himself openly discussed his Ukraine quid pro quo on broadcast TV
It was over the same guys he claimed to not know about or ever discuss with nor meet (all three lies).
2) Obama himself told agents Bidens corruption was an issue, it's why he would not endorse him.
3)Bobolinski first hand accounted Biden's Corruption- evidence
4) The lap top had tons of evidence
5) the FBI had evidence
6)Delaware courts had evidence
7)Ukraine had evidence including the tapes
8)they went after Giuliani and defamed him over his evidence and made it a crime for Trump to explore the Biden Corruption, so much so that the left committed obstruction many times to keep what the former topic OP claims is no evidence.
You don't commit crimes to cover up non crimes, they do it to cover up to stay out of jail.
In short the formwr title OP is either come overing up for Biden and accepting treason or he's proven the sources of media he has are helping and supporting Biden's treason. Hence why they call CNN China's news network.

All you have is a cheesy post for a source, what a maroon.

 

[Moonglow]

Why do you hate Native Americans?

The Use of the Swastika Symbol in American Indian Art

One of the most popular designs incorporated into American Indian art during the tourist era— approximately 1890 to 1940—was the swastika symbol, common to most indigenous peoples the world over and used throughout time. Copper bookends by Morris Robinson (Hopi). The swastika design indicates...

messieraz.com

Why do you love Nazis?

 

[Care4all]

There is a shitload of evidence, but the Dems will tell you that unless you have a straight up video tape of Biden committing a murder, then you have no proof of anything on him. They know there is a lot of evidence, they are just praying that Biden isnt going to be convicted, but that seems extremely unrealistic. There is never this much smoke around a person and then nothing happens to them. This kind of evidence always leads to conviction.

proof is proof, evidence is evidence.

Speculations, are simply speculations....conspiracy theories....which are very common in our political environment.

why would anyone believe these accusations without proof? ..... only for political posturing.

you are being used as a tool to spread accusations in the disguise of truth, imo.

if there is proof of Joe receiving money for a deed done for a foreign entity that was not USA best interest policy, then show the evidence, impeach him, remove him from office and indict him.

 

[candycorn]

Fact. All of the "proof" in the OP (laughable as most of it is) was around when Trump had the DOJ. They did nothing. Why?

Here come the conspiracy theories.

 

[22lcidw]

Joe is like the one-armed man in The Fugitive.... This man is dirty.

 

[Lesh]

proof is proof, evidence is evidence.

Speculations, are simply speculations....conspiracy theories....which are very common in our political environment.

why would anyone believe these accusations without proof? ..... only for political posturing.

you are being used as a tool to spread accusations in the disguise of truth, imo.

if there is proof of Joe receiving money for a deed done for a foreign entity that was not USA best interest policy, then show the evidence, impeach him, remove him from office and indict him.

Right wing retards think that allegations are evidence

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

There is no evidence Joe Biden took a bribe.

I haven't seen it. I'm seen some stuff y'all think is proof, but, when the rubber hits the road, it's not. You know the old saying..... Put up or shut up! Show me whatcha got.

www.usmessageboard.com

Rebuttle to the above:
I retitled this discussion because the OP titled it to be top posted to further his tactical propaganda. Use this one instead to debate the subject matter as it's rightfully titled.
There was always proof of Bidens quid pro Joes, therefore the other title and discussion should have been disallowed.
1) Joe himself openly discussed his Ukraine quid pro quo on broadcast TV
It was over the same guys he claimed to not know about or ever discuss with nor meet (all three lies).
2) Obama himself told agents Bidens corruption was an issue, it's why he would not endorse him.
3)Bobolinski first hand accounted Biden's Corruption- evidence
4) The lap top had tons of evidence
5) the FBI had evidence
6)Delaware courts had evidence
7)Ukraine had evidence including the tapes
8)they went after Giuliani and defamed him over his evidence and made it a crime for Trump to explore the Biden Corruption, so much so that the left committed obstruction many times to keep what the former topic OP claims is no evidence.
You don't commit crimes to cover up non crimes, they do it to cover up to stay out of jail.
In short the formwr title OP is either come overing up for Biden and accepting treason or he's proven the sources of media he has are helping and supporting Biden's treason. Hence why they call CNN China's news network.

You know the “evidence” doesn’t exist when you can’t find a better source than another USMB thread.

 

[rightwinger]

The problem for Conservatives in their “Biden is on the take”
“Biden is owned by China” rants is that Biden has very boring finances.

Most of his wealth is from salaries he earned as a Senator, VP and President along with teacher salaries from Dr Biden. Recently, he has income from book deals and speaking engagements.

All his wealth and holdings are fully documented. A couple of homes, stock investments……No shell companies, no offshore investments, no place to hide money.

If you say Biden is on the take…..Show me the money!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

There is no evidence Joe Biden took a bribe.

I haven't seen it. I'm seen some stuff y'all think is proof, but, when the rubber hits the road, it's not. You know the old saying..... Put up or shut up! Show me whatcha got.

www.usmessageboard.com

Rebuttle to the above:
I retitled this discussion because the OP titled it to be top posted to further his tactical propaganda. Use this one instead to debate the subject matter as it's rightfully titled.
There was always proof of Bidens quid pro Joes, therefore the other title and discussion should have been disallowed.
1) Joe himself openly discussed his Ukraine quid pro quo on broadcast TV
It was over the same guys he claimed to not know about or ever discuss with nor meet (all three lies).
2) Obama himself told agents Bidens corruption was an issue, it's why he would not endorse him.
3)Bobolinski first hand accounted Biden's Corruption- evidence
4) The lap top had tons of evidence
5) the FBI had evidence
6)Delaware courts had evidence
7)Ukraine had evidence including the tapes
8)they went after Giuliani and defamed him over his evidence and made it a crime for Trump to explore the Biden Corruption, so much so that the left committed obstruction many times to keep what the former topic OP claims is no evidence.
You don't commit crimes to cover up non crimes, they do it to cover up to stay out of jail.
In short the formwr title OP is either come overing up for Biden and accepting treason or he's proven the sources of media he has are helping and supporting Biden's treason. Hence why they call CNN China's news network.

What is the GOP waiting for? Why are they doing nothing but talking about it?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

There is a shitload of evidence, but the Dems will tell you that unless you have a straight up video tape of Biden committing a murder, then you have no proof of anything on him. They know there is a lot of evidence, they are just praying that Biden isnt going to be convicted, but that seems extremely unrealistic. There is never this much smoke around a person and then nothing happens to them. This kind of evidence always leads to conviction.

What is the GOP waiting for? Why are they doing nothing but talking about it?

 

[AntonToo]

There is no evidence Joe Biden took a bribe.

I haven't seen it. I'm seen some stuff y'all think is proof, but, when the rubber hits the road, it's not. You know the old saying..... Put up or shut up! Show me whatcha got.

www.usmessageboard.com

Rebuttle to the above:
I retitled this discussion because the OP titled it to be top posted to further his tactical propaganda. Use this one instead to debate the subject matter as it's rightfully titled.
There was always proof of Bidens quid pro Joes, therefore the other title and discussion should have been disallowed.
1) Joe himself openly discussed his Ukraine quid pro quo on broadcast TV
It was over the same guys he claimed to not know about or ever discuss with nor meet (all three lies).
2) Obama himself told agents Bidens corruption was an issue, it's why he would not endorse him.
3)Bobolinski first hand accounted Biden's Corruption- evidence
4) The lap top had tons of evidence
5) the FBI had evidence
6)Delaware courts had evidence
7)Ukraine had evidence including the tapes
8)they went after Giuliani and defamed him over his evidence and made it a crime for Trump to explore the Biden Corruption, so much so that the left committed obstruction many times to keep what the former topic OP claims is no evidence.
You don't commit crimes to cover up non crimes, they do it to cover up to stay out of jail.
In short the formwr title OP is either come overing up for Biden and accepting treason or he's proven the sources of media he has are helping and supporting Biden's treason. Hence why they call CNN China's news network.

How the hell is

1. Joe Biden proudly discussing pressuring Ukraine to fire a corrupt prosecutor.

…evidence of Biden taking a bribe??

Dummy, it is evidence of good foreign policy conduct, completely consistent with our foreign policy goals.

IMF thought it was great, DOS thought it was great. Ukrainian corruption watch groups said it was great. Corrupt prosecutor’s own deputy quit and said that office was a swamp….but you think it’s criminally bad because?…what? You need some Biden conspiracy in your mind because you can’t handle Trump’s indictment?

 

[AntonToo]

What is the GOP waiting for? Why are they doing nothing but talking about it?

Well it’s not like they ran DOJ for 4 year…oh wait.