Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One side is spending money on research and mitigation measure. The other side is spending money on lobbying and PR.
And I disagree with your numbers. Over 583 million has been spent in the last decade funding AGW deniers spew. The portion of government AGW spending going to lobbying and PR is microscopic.
One side is spending money on research and mitigation measure. The other side is spending money on lobbying and PR.
And I disagree with your numbers. Over 583 million has been spent in the last decade funding AGW deniers spew. The portion of government AGW spending going to lobbying and PR is microscopic.
Every dollar given to a so-called "climate scientist" is a dollar of funding for pro AGW propaganda. The job of "climate scientists" in this day and age is to produce convincing propaganda the global warming is true.
One side is spending money on research and mitigation measure. The other side is spending money on lobbying and PR.
And I disagree with your numbers. Over 583 million has been spent in the last decade funding AGW deniers spew. The portion of government AGW spending going to lobbying and PR is microscopic.
Every dollar given to a so-called "climate scientist" is a dollar of funding for pro AGW propaganda. The job of "climate scientists" in this day and age is to produce convincing propaganda the global warming is true.
No, Paddie, it isn't
407 * 1500 = 610,500 miles
125 * 5000 = 625,000 miles
Gosh, after 7 years in office, he's got a 15,000 mile lead over Bush. But, hey, he didn't start a needless trillion dollar, 100s of thousands dead war in Iraq, did he.
You are ignoring facts. Staying at expensive hotel for 100-500 persons costs a bundle. Considering "he" takes up an entire floor at about $5K/night/room + all the others scattered about. During his 8 years this is weekly, Biden Hillary Kerry and all do similar. too many think massive waste is OK.
give it a rest. Your Spin don't win.
My spin? Bush more than 3x as many vacation days, yet you still cling to the idea that Obama is some vacation hog. Pathetic
One side is spending money on research and mitigation measure. The other side is spending money on lobbying and PR.
And I disagree with your numbers. Over 583 million has been spent in the last decade funding AGW deniers spew. The portion of government AGW spending going to lobbying and PR is microscopic.
Every dollar given to a so-called "climate scientist" is a dollar of funding for pro AGW propaganda. The job of "climate scientists" in this day and age is to produce convincing propaganda the global warming is true.
No, Paddie, it isn't
OH lOOK'Y HERE..ANOTHER SHINY OBJECT..Abstracthttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534703000934
Abstract
The biggest mass extinction of the past 600 million years (My), the end-Permian event (251 My ago), witnessed the loss of as much as 95% of all species on Earth. Key questions for biologists concern what combination of environmental changes could possibly have had such a devastating effect, the scale and pattern of species loss, and the nature of the recovery. New studies on dating the event, contemporary volcanic activity, and the anatomy of the environmental crisis have changed our perspectives dramatically in the past five years. Evidence on causation is equivocal, with support for either an asteroid impact or mass volcanism, but the latter seems most probable. The extinction model involves global warming by 6°C and huge input of light carbon into the ocean-atmosphere system from the eruptions, but especially from gas hydrates, leading to an ever-worsening positive-feedback loop, the ‘runaway greenhouse’.
As one gets closer to the present date, the articles emphasize the warming far more than the cooling periods.
"EXTINCTION MODEL". Do you even bother to read the shit you post? Like I said there is ZERO empirical data to support warming as a cause. There is ample evidence to show glaciation as a cause.
High-resolution oxygen isotope records document the timing and magnitude of global warming across the Permian-Triassic (P-Tr) boundary. Oxygen isotope ratios measured on phosphate-bound oxygen in conodont apatite from the Meishan and Shangsi sections (South China) decrease by 2‰ in the latest Permian, translating into low-latitude surface water warming of 8 °C. The oxygen isotope shift coincides with the negative shift in carbon isotope ratios of carbonates, suggesting that the addition of isotopically light carbon to the ocean-atmosphere system by Siberian Traps volcanism and related processes resulted in higher greenhouse gas levels and global warming. The major temperature rise started immediately before the main extinction phase, with maximum and harmful temperatures documented in the latest Permian (Meishan: bed 27). The coincidence of climate warming and the main pulse of extinction suggest that global warming was one of the causes of the collapse of the marine and terrestrial ecosystems. In addition, very warm climate conditions in the Early Triassic may have played a major role in the delayed recovery in the aftermath of the Permian-Triassic crisis.
Climate warming in the latest Permian and the Permian–Triassic mass extinction
But of course you choose to ignore that study.
Yes it is. Any "climate scientist" who comes to the wrong conclusion immediately finds his funding drying up. Only one conclusion is allowed by the bureaucrats who dole out the research dollars.
Yes it is. Any "climate scientist" who comes to the wrong conclusion immediately finds his funding drying up. Only one conclusion is allowed by the bureaucrats who dole out the research dollars.
Yes it is. Any "climate scientist" who comes to the wrong conclusion immediately finds his funding drying up. Only one conclusion is allowed by the bureaucrats who dole out the research dollars.
Total utter crap.
Yes it is. Any "climate scientist" who comes to the wrong conclusion immediately finds his funding drying up. Only one conclusion is allowed by the bureaucrats who dole out the research dollars.
And YOU know this how?
Hmmm . . no, many scientist have reported exactly that.
Hmmm . . no, many scientist have reported exactly that.
Not those that matter, ie those that specialise in climate science.
Right. The ones who had their funding approved didn't have it denied. That's all you've said.
Hmmm . . no, many scientist have reported exactly that.
There is Big Money backing the denial troops too! The world's biggest polluters (fossil fuel industry), are also the biggest contributors to the denial sector.
Lmao, link?
Oh do you mean all those anti climate change commercials, billboards and them sponsoring NASCAR? That we never see...
OK.
Fossil fuel firms are still bankrolling climate denial lobby groups
Not just the Koch brothers: New study reveals funders behind the climate change denial effort
The Fossil Fuel Industry Paid This Scientist to Deny Human-Caused Climate Change | VICE News
Exxon's Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels' Role in Global Warming Decades Ago
Exxon Knew Of Climate Change In 1981, But Funded Deniers For 27 More Years
So crick please tell us how did you enjoy the beaches, the golf courses and Crawford Texas famous bowling alley? Since you think it's such a vacation.
I see you are too terrified to respond to my post. Why is that crick? Enquiring minds want to know....
So crick please tell us how did you enjoy the beaches, the golf courses and Crawford Texas famous bowling alley? Since you think it's such a vacation.
Do you people realize how pathetic you get trying to defend your fuckups? Obama has NOT taken excessive vacations. Just give it the fuck up.
I see you are too terrified to respond to my post. Why is that crick? Enquiring minds want to know....
What the fuck are you talking about?
I am sure there'd be big money in nearly anything that threaten our species. Asteroids, a new black death event or even another world war.
it is the way it works.
So crick please tell us how did you enjoy the beaches, the golf courses and Crawford Texas famous bowling alley? Since you think it's such a vacation.
Do you people realize how pathetic you get trying to defend your fuckups? Obama has NOT taken excessive vacations. Just give it the fuck up.
I see you are too terrified to respond to my post. Why is that crick? Enquiring minds want to know....
What the fuck are you talking about?
Hmmm . . no, many scientist have reported exactly that.
Let's see some. And with those let's see some evidence that they were not rejected for good cause.
