bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,322
I find it difficult to believe that you know anything about the law. You just displayed a boatload of legal ignorance. The people named are already being sued, shit-for-brains. The summonses have already bent drafted and are in the process of being delivered.Sandman was criticized for his actionsThe Church that runs the school is also being sued, so that argument goes down the tubes.
Nick Sandmann's lawyers can easily prove damages. They don't have to be immediate to be valid.
In the case of Nick Sandmann, his lawyer doesn't have to prove actual malice because Sandman didn't choose to become a public figure.
Club 54: Sandmann attorneys threaten dozens with legal action for Covington coverage
The process would likely have to be the point. Libel and slander laws make it tough to win, even for non-public persons such as Sandmann. Sullivan doesn’t apply in this case; the respondents in the prospective lawsuits made Sandmann into a public figure without participation from him. That relieves the plaintiff from having to establish “actual malice” toward Sandmann, but they would still have to prove that these media outlets and individuals acted with some form of malice to prevail.
That is neither slander or libel
Your silly smirk makes you look like a jerk is not slanderous. It is a statement of opinion
The people being sued lied about his actions. So did you. He could sue you if he wanted to. You're defaming him on a public forum. You'd better get your ducks in a row and stop lying about him before you receive a summons.
NO ONE has been sued, and no on is being sued. Get over that notion. It's not going to happen.
The lawyers sent out "chill letters" intended to make people stop talking about his client on threat of law suit. It's not going to work. I personally find it offensive that the parents of these children hire a public relations firm and a team of lawyers to defend their little brats, there claiming white privelege to an extent and degree seldom seen.
It is Nathan Phillips who is being slandered here by these so-called "Christian" families and their rich people's army of spin doctors, lawyers and liars. Sandman is not and has never been a "public figure". Getting his name splashed all over social medial doesn't make him a public figure, so that dog will not hunt.
These spoilt brats and their obnoxious parents are going to get bitch slapped into next week for these elitist, racist and frankly, lying tactics. I hope they're bankrupted by it.
Get back to us when you figure out the legal process...dumbass.
Covington high school student, lawyers prepare for possible libel fight, release video of 'the truth'
I spent 35 years working in the law, a$$hat, that's why I know they don't have a case. The lawyers are just trying trying to frighten news media into silence, and it's not working, nor should it. Their carefully edited video notwithstanding, these kids don't have a legal leg to stand on. And I can well imagine the judge slamming the chaperones for letting these children try to take on and swarm adults, which is what the unedited video shows.
There is no basis for a law suit. NONE. Nobody lied about these boys,
You're like a rat giving the finger to an eagle that is about to pounce on you.
Last edited: