Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I replayed this video three times and I still don't have a clue what they're talking about though. Can anybody here translate please?
The Irony!I won't know until you play the ENTIRE video, without EDITS.
Exactly.... Hint: When the start with the word 'so' the rest will be hogwash.
What she said was simple...
As long as Zelensky needs money that Zelensky, Putin and Biden we can pilfer, we will continue to send Zelensky money.
You've never been outside of your trailer, have you.I won't know until you play the ENTIRE video, without EDITS.
Pearls before swine.Alright, can somebody help me out then please and find the video where she said this? (I seriously doubt that you will be able to though.)
I replayed this video three times and I still don't have a clue what they're talking about though. Can anybody here translate please?
Yeah right, we all know that the US hasn't got its nose, its weapons, its money or its political chicanery anywhere near Ukraine.This happens to be the only thing this White House has got right. It means we won't negotiate Ukraine's future without Ukraine's participation.
Not necessarily. It could be a series of questions. Murderous scumbag Putin may have even answered! What the Logan Act doesn’t accept is citizens who aren’t part of the Executive branch authorized to do so negotiating with foreign leaders.View attachment 708837
Elon Musk denies report he spoke to Putin about use of nuclear weapons
Tesla boss, who recently floated his own peace plan, rejects claim he talked to Russian president about the war in Ukrainewww.theguardian.com
If he did? It would be against the law.
Logan Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Funny Karine didn't know any of that...Not necessarily. It could be a series of questions. Murderous scumbag Putin may have even answered! What the Logan Act doesn’t accept is citizens who aren’t part of the Executive branch authorized to do so negotiating with foreign leaders.
And this ^^^ might be the case.What she is saying is that the U.S. position is that no discussions can be held with Russia unilaterally. Any discussions on this conflict, regardless of who from the U.S. is engaged, must include a representative of Ukraine. So any conclusions that come out of a Musk-Putin conversation are meaningless. Don't waste our time. We are not interested.
And my retirement check from the State of Washington would buyYou've never been outside of your trailer, have you.
Well? Who the hell is paying all the bills over there? Shit, with the amount of debt the American tax-payer has taken on, and the amount of inflation we are experiencing?Ukraine only does what the U.S. government tells them to do.
I know that what the US did in 2014 has no bearing on Zelensky's election in 2019. The Ukraine desk at the State Dept. still had the same people as under Obama, and they backed Poroshenko. But Zelensky won anyway. Those same people were perfectly willing to throw Zelensky under the bus when they tried to impeach Trump for the phone call, and portrayed Zelensky as some kind of helpless chump who was being blackmailed by Trump.Yeah right, we all know that the US hasn't got its nose, its weapons, its money or its political chicanery anywhere near Ukraine.
This happens to be the only thing this White House has got right. It means we won't negotiate Ukraine's future without Ukraine's participation.
