This con forum keeps asking "Should the GOP let THEM take your guns?"

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the M16.
The standard .223 round is designed to tumble and cause a lot of damage, generally to wound an enemy HUMAN in combat rather than kill them as it takes two people to carry a wounded person, putting three people out of the fight. It was designed to fit a bayonet.
The M16 was designed as an assault rifle. Making it semi-automatic rather than full-automatic only means you can shoot less rounds per minute.
So?
"Assault rifle" has a specific technical definition, based on operation and function.
An AR15 is not an assault rifle.

An "assault weapon" has a specific legal definition, based on cosmetic attachments that scare anti-gun loons.
An AR15 may or may not be an 'assault weapon".
Conservatives generally make their own definition for everything, and most of the time it doesn't match up with reality...
Feel free to illustrate how any of what I said is wrong.
 
The truth is, the notion of 'gun confiscation' is ridiculous, unfounded demagoguery.

No one advocates guns be 'confiscated.'

No government seeks to 'confiscate' firearms, as any such measure 'authorizing ' gun 'confiscation' would be in violation of the Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution, the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause in particular.

To maintain otherwise is ignorant idiocy.
 
The truth is, THEM will NEVER try to take your guns. THEM already know it's impossible to do that. THEM is however, trying to ban sales of assault weapons. It's no different than banning the sale of stinger missiles and bomb making materials. It's these unscrupulous cons that are selling these items to ISIS.


Actually...it is going to turn out obama and hilary were providing weapons to isis through the embasy in libya......

And rifles of any sort belong to the American people, not our employees the military and the police.....
 
And in that modification it ceased to be an assault rifle. Our sons have pellet guns that look exactly like an AR-15....are they assault rifles? You loons and your ignorance of weapons are mind boggling

Nah its your ignorance of reality. You equate a pellet to the round an AR-15 shoots. You don't know firearms at all. You're a rookie. Stop embarrassing yourself and go play with your pellet gun.

I know an AR-15 that has been modified is not an assault rifle. We have a neighbor who has a Porsche, sort of, it's a kit car, a Porsche look alike on a Pontiac Fero, it LOOKS like a Porsche but it's not.

I have a CCW, I shoot at least once a month at a gun range and we have a gun safe with 14 weapons ranging from 9MMs to high powered rifles. So why don't you sit your ignorant ass down and stop trying to tell me the definition of an assault rifle. Got it, bub?

Once a month? Ok Rambo.

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the M16.
The standard .223 round is designed to tumble and cause a lot of damage, generally to wound an enemy HUMAN in combat rather than kill them as it takes two people to carry a wounded person, putting three people out of the fight. It was designed to fit a bayonet.
The M16 was designed as an assault rifle. Making it semi-automatic rather than full-automatic only means you can shoot less rounds per minute.

An M1A1 tank can fire roughly 6-8 rounds average per minute. By your reasoning, if you modify it to shoot only one round per minute it is no longer a tank.

I know the weekend warriors have their myths that they cling to with grim death, but they are only myths.

It's still not an assault rifle, Peabody. Now cease bothering me, you ever fired off a round you'd pee your panties and most likely cry

I own an AR-15, M1 Garand, and various other rifles and pistols. I have an uncle that died in the Battle of the Bulge carrying his M1.

I've never figured out where this 'guns are our gods' culture of whackos comes from other than guns make some people feel powerful who otherwise feel powerless.

Relax, they aren't magic talisman, they don't bestow magical powers on you. The only reason an assault rifle exists is to kill other people. They can be used for sport shooting targets but what inbred non-hunter would ever use one to hunt with?

Reeellllaaaxxxx.

Any rifle, or gun for that matter, exists for one thing...to preserve the life of the user...and it often achieves this end by not even firing.
 
The truth is, the notion of 'gun confiscation' is ridiculous, unfounded demagoguery.

No one advocates guns be 'confiscated.'

No government seeks to 'confiscate' firearms, as any such measure 'authorizing ' gun 'confiscation' would be in violation of the Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution, the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause in particular.

To maintain otherwise is ignorant idiocy.


You are delusional....that is the hope and dream of the democrat party leadership...
 
What is it with this style of rifle that agitates you guys so much......as guns go it is one of the least used in this country for crime......rifles in general are used less than knives or empty hands to kill people....yet you guys act like it is used all the time.....When the original, stupid "assault " weapon ban was enacted one police chief pointed out that you were more likely to meet an escaped tiger than to run into a criminal with an assault rifle.......

What is it that bugs you nuts so much?


Considering there are an estimated 1 million of these guns in private hands, and they are almost never used to commit crimes.....again...what exactly bugs you nuts about them?
 
The M16 was designed as an assault rifle. Making it semi-automatic rather than full-automatic only means you can shoot less rounds per minute.

M16s aren't full automatics, moron. They have three settings: safety, semi, 3-round burst. But burst is generally not used by the military. Soldiers are trained to use their weapons in semi-auto and not use burst because it's largely a waste. One shot, one kill.
 
Most people wouldn't know what an assault rifle was if they were holding one.
 
The M16 was designed as an assault rifle. Making it semi-automatic rather than full-automatic only means you can shoot less rounds per minute.

M16s aren't full automatics, moron. They have three settings: safety, semi, 3-round burst. But burst is generally not used by the military. Soldiers are trained to use their weapons in semi-auto and not use burst because it's largely a waste. One shot, one kill.

LOL So you don't understand the discusson. Then why do you open your mouth?

Thank you Mr. Obvious, can you now go into detail the differences between a car and an automobile so all of humanity can bask your your infinite wisdom?

You forgot to include the length of the suppressor on the front! Dear god what will people do without knowing every little unimportant mundane detail? Save this inane nonsense for some prepper loser website argument.
 
The M16 was designed as an assault rifle. Making it semi-automatic rather than full-automatic only means you can shoot less rounds per minute.

M16s aren't full automatics, moron. They have three settings: safety, semi, 3-round burst. But burst is generally not used by the military. Soldiers are trained to use their weapons in semi-auto and not use burst because it's largely a waste. One shot, one kill.

LOL So you don't understand the discusson. Then why do you open your mouth?

Thank you Mr. Obvious, can you now go into detail the differences between a car and an automobile so all of humanity can bask your your infinite wisdom?

You forgot to include the length of the suppressor on the front! Dear god what will people do without knowing every little unimportant mundane detail? Save this inane nonsense for some prepper loser website argument.

You made a factually false claim, and now that you got called out on it, it's a mundane detail? :cuckoo:
 
The truth is, THEM will NEVER try to take your guns. THEM already know it's impossible to do that. THEM is however, trying to ban sales of assault weapons. It's no different than banning the sale of stinger missiles and bomb making materials. It's these unscrupulous cons that are selling these items to ISIS.
Ironically it seems that some movers and shakers in the democrat party (Bill Ayers) are actually former bomb making terrorists but they were magically exonerated by friendly left wing judges. Meanwhile president Hussein has been selling the equivalent of stinger missiles to radical revolutionaries and the prog left doesn't have a freaking clue of what the hell "assault weapons" are.
 
The AR-15 is the civilian version of the M16.
The standard .223 round is designed to tumble and cause a lot of damage, generally to wound an enemy HUMAN in combat rather than kill them as it takes two people to carry a wounded person, putting three people out of the fight. It was designed to fit a bayonet.
The M16 was designed as an assault rifle. Making it semi-automatic rather than full-automatic only means you can shoot less rounds per minute.
So?
"Assault rifle" has a specific technical definition, based on operation and function.
An AR15 is not an assault rifle.

An "assault weapon" has a specific legal definition, based on cosmetic attachments that scare anti-gun loons.
An AR15 may or may not be an 'assault weapon".

Conservatives generally make their own definition for everything, and most of the time it doesn't match up with reality but it 'feels' good.

So feel free to see 'colors' in black and white.

Why shouldn't we, hell you just made up your "guns are our God culture"? Such a fucking drama queen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top