mamooth
Diamond Member
The whole "debunking the myth" line is the real myth. That there was a serious belief in the scientific community that the world was going to enter another glacial period is fact.
"Fact" in this case meaning something you believe with a religious fervor, despite the contrary evidence.
That this belief was held by a significant portion of scientists is fact.
If it's a fact, show us the evidence. You need to understand that we in the reason-based community aren't like you, and we won't accept faith-based claims.
However, the authors of the link seem to quickly forget and abandon all of this with their methodology of "debunking" that follows. They proceed to look for research papers that would declare "smoking gun" type scenarios predicting global cooling. They find few. Which is not at all surprising, because as they said themselves, there was no real "climate science" of the day.
That's a creative way to backpedal. Faced with the evidence that your claim that climate science predicted cooling was false, you respond by denying climate science existed. You certainly thought it existed when you incorrectly claimed it was predicting cooling. Climate science only seemed to vanish when you found it said the opposite of what you claimed.
As was said earlier in the thread, it's in the policy statement. Violations of company policy are subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination.
And that's a paranoid conspiracy theory.
And that's why you're not taken seriously. Your science and logic stinks, and all you have is conspiracy theories.