Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact is at least if you adhere to science that the Earth is 5 billion years old, and that the Universe was around for 8 billion years before that. So with this it is clear that the Earth was not the beginning and that there was plenty of time before Earth for life to come from elsewhere. Assuming that everything that is here is from here because it is here is illogical as we know that things travel![]()
Nothing Created Everything
Richard Dawkins is arguably the modern poster boy for Charles Darwin. However, a key difference radically separates the two men. Darwin b...www.goodreads.com
It's really that simple, everything that is, came to be what it is, because nothing decided to write genetic code
The problem with your argument here is that, and let's assume God created everything, that either God was created from nothing, or God wasn't even created.
So, if God wasn't created, then things being created from nothing is more plausible than something not even being created.
If God was created, then God was created from nothing. Which means things can be created from nothing, which means you don't need a God.
Or, God was created from something, who created God? Another God? And who created that God?
Your belief system is just as wacky, if not more so, than atheists' belief system.
Actually Hollie is the one who needs to offer the evidence that ponds created everythingI have no "proof". I can offer evidence, but atheists won't accept it.So….. you acknowledge you’re unable not just to prove your gods but are unable to offer any evidence of your version of gods so you deflect with an obtuse response.
Do you believe in infinite regression?Or, God was created from something, who created God? Another God? And who created that God?
The fact is at least if you adhere to science that the Earth is 5 billion years old, and that the Universe was around for 8 billion years before that. So with this it is clear that the Earth was not the beginning and that there was plenty of time before Earth for life to come from elsewhere. Assuming that everything that is here is from here because it is here is illogical as we know that things travel![]()
Nothing Created Everything
Richard Dawkins is arguably the modern poster boy for Charles Darwin. However, a key difference radically separates the two men. Darwin b...www.goodreads.com
It's really that simple, everything that is, came to be what it is, because nothing decided to write genetic code
The problem with your argument here is that, and let's assume God created everything, that either God was created from nothing, or God wasn't even created.
So, if God wasn't created, then things being created from nothing is more plausible than something not even being created.
If God was created, then God was created from nothing. Which means things can be created from nothing, which means you don't need a God.
Or, God was created from something, who created God? Another God? And who created that God?
Your belief system is just as wacky, if not more so, than atheists' belief system.
Your problem is spiritual.Do you believe in infinite regression?Or, God was created from something, who created God? Another God? And who created that God?
I don't believe in anything.
I don't believe in God. I don't believe there isn't a God. I don't believe we exist. I don't believe we don't exist.
Believing is ridiculous. It's literally saying "I don't know this, so I'm just going to pretend this is true".
I have no "proof". I can offer evidence, but atheists won't accept it.So….. you acknowledge you’re unable not just to prove your gods but are unable to offer any evidence of your version of gods so you deflect with an obtuse response.
Your problem is spiritual.Do you believe in infinite regression?Or, God was created from something, who created God? Another God? And who created that God?
I don't believe in anything.
I don't believe in God. I don't believe there isn't a God. I don't believe we exist. I don't believe we don't exist.
Believing is ridiculous. It's literally saying "I don't know this, so I'm just going to pretend this is true".
God - Christians don't speak about a god- we speak about god. I guess you and many other atheists say "a god" because you and they use Christian arguments against the existence of gods, which go hand in hand with arguements of the old Greek philosophers.Not knowing how something came to be does not mean that a god did it.Atheists can't explain where the Universe came from
And they don't want anyone else to either
Did you ever consider that we may not be able to ever understand the processes of the inception at the universe because our brains are simply incapable of the task?
My dog will never understand the concept of prime numbers
because her brain is incapable of the thought processes necessary.
Knowing that a dog's, or a chimpanzee's brain are made from the same stuff as a human brain isn't it reasonable to think that even the human brain has a limit as to what types of information is can process?
Words have meaning. Life is hardly "everything." Try smelling the inanimate for a change. Also, Dawkins has obviously benefitted from having more scientifically established facts to work with. Darwin had fewer options.Actually Hollie is the one who needs to offer the evidence that ponds created everythingI have no "proof". I can offer evidence, but atheists won't accept it.So….. you acknowledge you’re unable not just to prove your gods but are unable to offer any evidence of your version of gods so you deflect with an obtuse response.
I'm not religious but it's obvious to me that we have a creator. I'll be going to bed soon and, take my word for it, I won't lose any sleep over your beliefs.or people like me who are non-religious,![]()
Horse to water my friend.Well, I can't reply to your post as you haven't written enough for a proper reply.
Life could be in space, on ships looking for the next place to live. Not sure why people like you discount this and yet claim that life came on meteorsThe fact is at least if you adhere to science that the Earth is 5 billion years old, and that the Universe was around for 8 billion years before that. So with this it is clear that the Earth was not the beginning and that there was plenty of time before Earth for life to come from elsewhere. Assuming that everything that is here is from here because it is here is illogical as we know that things travel![]()
Nothing Created Everything
Richard Dawkins is arguably the modern poster boy for Charles Darwin. However, a key difference radically separates the two men. Darwin b...www.goodreads.com
It's really that simple, everything that is, came to be what it is, because nothing decided to write genetic code
The problem with your argument here is that, and let's assume God created everything, that either God was created from nothing, or God wasn't even created.
So, if God wasn't created, then things being created from nothing is more plausible than something not even being created.
If God was created, then God was created from nothing. Which means things can be created from nothing, which means you don't need a God.
Or, God was created from something, who created God? Another God? And who created that God?
Your belief system is just as wacky, if not more so, than atheists' belief system.
Well, there are plenty of possibilities of what happened.
Chances are life is flying around in outer space passing through solar systems and then being bombarded onto planets and may or may not take hold as life. But also, it's potentially possible that life on Earth started from the heat in the seas.
Or both. Who knows? We don't. But some will make it up and tell us they do.
I thought that nothing creating everything was considered science?You really need to move your proselytizing to the religion forum.
LOL you are a clueless buffoon who does not even know what you believe yourself
Well, all living things have DNA, right? Without DNA, they cannot develop, right? So, for the sake of this discussion, let's say that non-organic material somehow morphed into a life form via a "primordial soup". How would that life form develop without the prerequisite DNA that is needed to develop?The best theory is the primordial soup, lightning and other factors were the origins of the first cellular organisms.
I offer you the advice to talk to a physicist and they can explain to you about virtual particles.I offer you the advice to be seen by a shrink and that you can explain your virtual particles to themWhat do you have to offer?What meds do you takeActually no one believes in nothing. For theists there was always God. For atheists there was something became something else (our universe).![]()
Nothing Created Everything
Richard Dawkins is arguably the modern poster boy for Charles Darwin. However, a key difference radically separates the two men. Darwin b...www.goodreads.com
It's really that simple, everything that is, came to be what it is, because nothing decided to write genetic code