bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,317
- 2,180
In a court of law the defendant seldom even testifies. The prosecution has to prove he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.No one has to prove that senile old fool is lying. He has to prove that his idiotic babbling is true.ya see, ALL you gotta do is PROVE Woodard was lying -
all of you RW dipshits should know everything there is to know about PROOF being mandatory to pass your strict guidelines.
dont you ........
in a court of law the prosecuting attorney proves the defendant is lying ...
outside a court youre a fucking idiot 24/7
Thanks for demonstrating your total ignorance of American law.
Woodward failed to prove his charges are true beyond a reasonable doubt.