TNHarley
Diamond Member
- Sep 27, 2012
- 93,437
- 55,578
- 2,605
Ah ha!! some people have called Ted Nugent "Ned" before.hence my confusion...sorry about that..
No problem
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah ha!! some people have called Ted Nugent "Ned" before.hence my confusion...sorry about that..
If a crazy person and felon WANTS a gun, they're going to get one, no matter what the laws say! That's why they're called CRIMINALS. They break the law!!!
Now if any of those people had had a gun on them, this might have been a different story and people may have been saved. But you wouldn't see it that way....
If a crazy person and felon WANTS a gun, they're going to get one, no matter what the laws say! That's why they're called CRIMINALS. They break the law!!!
Now if any of those people had had a gun on them, this might have been a different story and people may have been saved. But you wouldn't see it that way....
If we were able to trace the weapon used, we would be able to pinpoint who sold (or had stolen from them) the gun used. Then, the victims families would have an avenue to civilly sue the person who provided - willingly or not - the gun that killed their loved one.
So....if I am killed by a felon,AND then he steals my gun,and kills again,my family could be sued.,if I follow this to its logical conclusion...?
If a crazy person and felon WANTS a gun, they're going to get one, no matter what the laws say! That's why they're called CRIMINALS. They break the law!!!
Now if any of those people had had a gun on them, this might have been a different story and people may have been saved. But you wouldn't see it that way....
If we were able to trace the weapon used, we would be able to pinpoint who sold (or had stolen from them) the gun used. Then, the victims families would have an avenue to civilly sue the person who provided - willingly or not - the gun that killed their loved one.
If a crazy person and felon WANTS a gun, they're going to get one, no matter what the laws say! That's why they're called CRIMINALS. They break the law!!!
Now if any of those people had had a gun on them, this might have been a different story and people may have been saved. But you wouldn't see it that way....
If we were able to trace the weapon used, we would be able to pinpoint who sold (or had stolen from them) the gun used. Then, the victims families would have an avenue to civilly sue the person who provided - willingly or not - the gun that killed their loved one.
If a crazy person and felon WANTS a gun, they're going to get one, no matter what the laws say! That's why they're called CRIMINALS. They break the law!!!
Now if any of those people had had a gun on them, this might have been a different story and people may have been saved. But you wouldn't see it that way....
If we were able to trace the weapon used, we would be able to pinpoint who sold (or had stolen from them) the gun used. Then, the victims families would have an avenue to civilly sue the person who provided - willingly or not - the gun that killed their loved one.
Hey easy money! Suing is getting ridiculous. Mcdonalds coffee? Dumb hag. Robber breaking in someones house and gets hurt. POS thug. Bad thing is, if the gun was stolen and someone died form it, they probably would get some money SMDH
Fresno Shooting: Reports Of Mass Shooting At Apple Valley Farms Plant In Central California
Another mass shooting, two dead.
If only everyone had had guns, right?
The shooter had anextensive criminal history dating back into the 1990s.
Lawrence Jones, California Parolee, Opens Fire At Food Processing Plant (PHOTOS, VIDEO)
The paroleemoved methodically between his first three victims, putting a handgun against their head or neck before pulling the trigger, police said...
... The victims inside the plant did not hear the shooter because it was loud and at least some of them wore noise protectors, Dyer said...
Yet all the laws that make it illegal for a felon to have a gun had no effect.
Imagine that.
I doubt losing a loved one and suing the person responsible is easy money; it is all about a gun owner exercising personal responsibility.
So....if I am killed by a felon,AND then he steals my gun,and kills again,my family could be sued.,if I follow this to its logical conclusion...?
Did the victims have guns?
If a crazy person and felon WANTS a gun, they're going to get one, no matter what the laws say! That's why they're called CRIMINALS. They break the law!!!
Now if any of those people had had a gun on them, this might have been a different story and people may have been saved. But you wouldn't see it that way....
If we were able to trace the weapon used, we would be able to pinpoint who sold (or had stolen from them) the gun used. Then, the victims families would have an avenue to civilly sue the person who provided - willingly or not - the gun that killed their loved one.
If a crazy person and felon WANTS a gun, they're going to get one, no matter what the laws say! That's why they're called CRIMINALS. They break the law!!!
Now if any of those people had had a gun on them, this might have been a different story and people may have been saved. But you wouldn't see it that way....
If we were able to trace the weapon used, we would be able to pinpoint who sold (or had stolen from them) the gun used. Then, the victims families would have an avenue to civilly sue the person who provided - willingly or not - the gun that killed their loved one.
You think people who are hit by a stolen car should be able to sue the owner of the car? Are you completely insane?
No, I'm not insane.
You Windbag seem to be rather ignorant, "you can sue a ham sandwhich in the United States". And if the elements are proved to a jury, you can collect.