Thousands of pages of congressional testimony shed light on 2016 Trump Tower meeting

EvilEyeFleegle

Dogpatch USA
Gold Supporting Member
Nov 2, 2017
16,279
9,333
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.8761f0f375c7


So..a lot of info here--after reading the entire article..it's long...My take-away is that nothing illegal happened, at the time, although had the Russian lawyer had any dirt on Clinton..Jared was more than willing to deal for it. But no dirt was offered..so..no crime...at the time.


There could be some issues with what appears to be some scripting of a cover-up--with false statements being circulated--one famously written by the President.


We shall see. Nice to see that the Senate is considerable more thorough than the House. Still the usual partisan spinning.
rolleyes.gif


"A music promoter who promised Donald Trump Jr. over email that a Russian lawyer would provide dirt about Hillary Clinton in June 2016 made the offer because he had been assured the Moscow attorney was “well connected” and had “damaging material,” the promoter testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee.


Rob Goldstone told the committee that his client, the Russian pop star and developer Emin Agalarov, had insisted he help set up the meeting between President Trump’s son and the lawyer during the campaign to pass along material on Clinton, overriding Goldstone’s own warnings that the meeting would be a bad idea.


“He said, ‘it doesn’t matter. You just have to get the meeting,” Goldstone, a British citizen, testified.


The intensity with which Agalorov and his father, the billionaire Aras Agalarov, sought the Trump Tower meeting, which has become a key point of scrutiny for congressional inquiries and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, was revealed in more than 2,500 pages of congressional testimony and exhibits that were released by the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday morning.


The testimony shows that attendees at the June 9, 2016, Trump Tower meeting largely agreed with Trump Jr.’s long-standing contention that the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, did not transmit dirt about Clinton. She has denied she was acting on behalf of the Russian government.


[Russian lawyer who met with Trump Jr. has long history of fighting sanctions]


But the new information helps explain why Goldstone had written the candidate’s son before the meeting that Veselnitskaya would bring “very high level and sensitive information” that was part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump” — and why Trump Jr. responded, “if it is what you say, then I love it.”"
 
:5_1_12024::banana::backpedal::dance::iyfyus.jpg: That's it? that's all ya got? we already know all of this its been out since the first week of the witch hunt....watching CNN try to make hay out of old news is priceless....but watching their rubes follow along like sheep is even better...
 
I've been reading Donald Trump Junior's testimony. Interesting stuff. You can be sure no pseuducons will read it and will instead await instructions from their propagandists on what to parrot about it.

1. Donald Trump, Jr. receives a message the Russians want to help his father win the election, and that they have some dirt on Clinton they'd like to give him.

2. Donald Trump, Jr. enthusiastically agrees to meet with the Russians to receive the dirt.

3. The meeting is arranged for that Thursday in Trump Tower.

4. The same day Donald Trump, Jr. agrees to the meeting, Candidate Trump announces to the world he is going to have some interesting things to say about Clinton the following Monday.

5. The meeting takes place. For whatever reason (probably because Trump Senior blabbed to the world like an idiot), the Russians do not provide the dirt.

6. The following Monday, no press conference about Clinton by Trump.

7. The dirt on Clinton begins showing up on Wikileaks instead, late in the summer, in accordance with Donald Trump, Jr.'s wishes.

8. Trump publicly calls on Russia to interfere even more in our election. "Russia, if you're listening..."

9. New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
 
:5_1_12024::banana::backpedal::dance::iyfyus.jpg: That's it? that's all ya got? we already know all of this its been out since the first week of the witch hunt....watching CNN try to make hay out of old news is priceless....
You partisan hacks amuse me...I posted this because it was due to be released..as the results of the Senate investigation. Nothing to do with CNN. Had you read the entire article..which we both know you did not..you would have known that. But jerk that knee...it defines you.
 
Since this was a significant focus of Mueller's investigation, and once again it shows no illegal activity.....
 
nothing happened but talk about adoptions - :abgg2q.jpg:

if the entire Trump Cartel wasnt such a bunch of liars, then maybe the closed door meeting with a Kremlin informant in Trump tower with Jr MIGHT NOT LOOK SO DAMN CROOKED !
 
You partisan hacks amuse me...I posted this because it was due to be released..as the results of the Senate investigation. Nothing to do with CNN. Had you read the entire article..which we both know you did not..you would have known that. But jerk that knee...it defines you
But its all old news repackaged as a new event...CNN is going nuts running in circles over it...nice try but the people have seen this act before...by the way Trump's numbers for his Job approval are moving up not down and is higher than Obama's at the same time in his term.....
 
Since this was a significant focus of Mueller's investigation, and once again it shows no illegal activity.....
And you know this BECAUSE you've NOT BEEN PRIVY to have reviewed all of the investigation's documentation on the matter, you've NOT ANALYZED the thousands of pages of interview transcripts, you've NOT REVIEWED the other tangible evidence and you CAN'T POSSIBLY KNOW without equivocation that the obvious conclusion is NO ILLEGAL ACTIVITY...
AND YOU KNOW THIS HOW WITHOUT THE EVIDENCE?

Inquiring minds would like to know where you bought this crystal ball and its cost! Can you tell us all what Lockheed Martin shares will be going for next April 15th?
 
That's it? that's all ya got? we already know all of this its been out since the first week of the witch hunt....watching CNN try to make hay out of old news is priceless....but watching their rubes follow along like sheep is even better...

You just read through 200 pages of testimony in 53 minutes (less quite likely)?

AMAZIN'!! :)
 
nothing happened but talk about adoptions - :abgg2q.jpg:

if the entire Trump Cartel wasnt such a bunch of liars, then maybe the closed door meeting with a Kremlin informant in Trump tower with Jr MIGHT NOT LOOK SO DAMN CROOKED !

"When you are innocent … act like it," Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday" when asked about Trump's repeated Twitter attacks on Mueller, whose probe has become increasingly perilous to the president and his inner circle. "If you’ve done nothing wrong, you should want the investigation to be as fulsome and thorough as possible."

f2540c803d85c5a7ea0344222c45ab90--conservative-politics-amen.jpg
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.8761f0f375c7


So..a lot of info here--after reading the entire article..it's long...My take-away is that nothing illegal happened, at the time, although had the Russian lawyer had any dirt on Clinton..Jared was more than willing to deal for it. But no dirt was offered..so..no crime...at the time.


There could be some issues with what appears to be some scripting of a cover-up--with false statements being circulated--one famously written by the President.


We shall see. Nice to see that the Senate is considerable more thorough than the House. Still the usual partisan spinning.
rolleyes.gif


"A music promoter who promised Donald Trump Jr. over email that a Russian lawyer would provide dirt about Hillary Clinton in June 2016 made the offer because he had been assured the Moscow attorney was “well connected” and had “damaging material,” the promoter testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee.


Rob Goldstone told the committee that his client, the Russian pop star and developer Emin Agalarov, had insisted he help set up the meeting between President Trump’s son and the lawyer during the campaign to pass along material on Clinton, overriding Goldstone’s own warnings that the meeting would be a bad idea.


“He said, ‘it doesn’t matter. You just have to get the meeting,” Goldstone, a British citizen, testified.


The intensity with which Agalorov and his father, the billionaire Aras Agalarov, sought the Trump Tower meeting, which has become a key point of scrutiny for congressional inquiries and special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, was revealed in more than 2,500 pages of congressional testimony and exhibits that were released by the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday morning.


The testimony shows that attendees at the June 9, 2016, Trump Tower meeting largely agreed with Trump Jr.’s long-standing contention that the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, did not transmit dirt about Clinton. She has denied she was acting on behalf of the Russian government.


[Russian lawyer who met with Trump Jr. has long history of fighting sanctions]


But the new information helps explain why Goldstone had written the candidate’s son before the meeting that Veselnitskaya would bring “very high level and sensitive information” that was part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump” — and why Trump Jr. responded, “if it is what you say, then I love it.”"
So treason, plain and simple
 

Forum List

Back
Top