Threaten a public officials kids - 3+ years

[iceberg]

and where did he threaten kids again?

"Kids"?

I said nothing about "kids". I'm pretty sure, without even looking it up, that kids can't even be elected to Congress.

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

its just pogo being pogo. he only bugs me when i remove ignore to see my own lost quotes when someone elses responds where i didn't.

i *REALLY WISH* this forum would not send me an alert for an embedded quote, just direct.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Not there in the OP. And "families" is not "kids" anyway.

Again --- learn what the fuck click-bait is.

No, dummy. Read it here at your beloved Washington Post
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...8-a6d4-ca1d035642ce_story.html&freshcontent=1

 

[Carl in Michigan]

"Kids"?

I said nothing about "kids". I'm pretty sure, without even looking it up, that kids can't even be elected to Congress.

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

its just pogo being pogo. he only bugs me when i remove ignore to see my own lost quotes when someone elses responds where i didn't.

i *REALLY WISH* this forum would not send me an alert for an embedded quote, just direct.

It would help if idiots learned ho to quote ONLY the person they're responding to.

 

[iceberg]

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

its just pogo being pogo. he only bugs me when i remove ignore to see my own lost quotes when someone elses responds where i didn't.

i *REALLY WISH* this forum would not send me an alert for an embedded quote, just direct.

It would help if idiots learned ho to quote ONLY the person they're responding to.

i hit "quote" and the entire conversations quotes are in here, so they will be notified.

80% of my notifications of QUOTE ALERT are because i say something, some asswhipe responds i have on ignore and someone else responds to what they were telling me and they go off on a rabbit hole and i wind up having to go look at the very shit i'm trying to ignore at least long enough to realize it's a rabbit hole and then just try to figure out if anyone actually responded to me i'd like to reply to in all that.

annoying and i think it's just how xenforo works. not looked to see really if there's an option on the admin side but there sure isn't on the user side.

 

[JakeStarkey]

and where did he threaten kids again?

"Kids"?

I said nothing about "kids". I'm pretty sure, without even looking it up, that kids can't even be elected to Congress.

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

 

[Mac1958]

"Kids"?

I said nothing about "kids". I'm pretty sure, without even looking it up, that kids can't even be elected to Congress.

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

Not interested, troll, sorry.
.

 

[iceberg]

"Kids"?

I said nothing about "kids". I'm pretty sure, without even looking it up, that kids can't even be elected to Congress.

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

you and pogo must be cybers. you both pull the same lame shit for nothing but a reaction.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

Not interested, troll, sorry.
.

Of course trolls like you are not interested in facts.

 

[Mac1958]

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

Not interested, troll, sorry.
.

Of course trolls like you are not interested in facts.

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

you and pogo must be cybers. you both pull the same lame shit for nothing but a reaction.

If you are not interested in facts, then tough to be you. The OP did in fact say 'kids'.

 

[Mac1958]

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

you and pogo must be cybers. you both pull the same lame shit for nothing but a reaction.

If you are not interested in facts, then tough to be you. The OP did in fact say 'kids'.

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
.

 

[JakeStarkey]

you do realize the headline *I* put there says *kids* correct?

so - the OP (me) did talk about KIDS. so even if I was wrong about whether or not he has kids, you're still wrong because you're saying i didn't say anything about KIDS (which i did) and if he has no kids then we are both wrong.

only one of us had to go be a dick about it. mirror up, son.

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

Not interested, troll, sorry.
.

Of course trolls like you are not interested in facts.

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
.

A regressive righty like Mac1958 just can't stay on track. He is still suffering from ODS.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Spamming the same link is a characteristic of a regressive righty like Mac1958.

 

[iceberg]

Deflection is predictable here.
.

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

Not interested, troll, sorry.
.

Of course trolls like you are not interested in facts.

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
.

A regressive righty like Mac1958 just can't stay on track. He is still suffering from ODS.

a wise man would shut the fuck up right about now.

a dumbass or troll will keep on.

your move, chief.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You just deflected, podjo. The headline says 'kids'.

Not interested, troll, sorry.
.

Of course trolls like you are not interested in facts.

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
.

A regressive righty like Mac1958 just can't stay on track. He is still suffering from ODS.

a wise man would shut the fuck up right about now.

a dumbass or troll will keep on.

your move, chief.

You will keep on then, chief.

 

[iceberg]

Not interested, troll, sorry.
.

Of course trolls like you are not interested in facts.

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
.

A regressive righty like Mac1958 just can't stay on track. He is still suffering from ODS.

a wise man would shut the fuck up right about now.

a dumbass or troll will keep on.

your move, chief.

You will keep on then, chief.

i rest my case.

back to ignore for the troll.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Which part of "public official's kids" confuses you?

The OP says nothing about "kids" either.

Read it.

Will y'all morons NEVER learn to not just stop at the headline?

See thread title.

Then READ PAST thread title.

Then recognize that thread title is naught but click-bait with no relation to the topic.

You want me to come out there to Belize and actually read it aloud to you? Is that what you need?
Send plane ticket and I'll consider it.

I quoted it so you wouldn't have to actually read anything. Here it is again:

"We are coming to get every (expletive) one of you and your families," Hoff said.

Not there in the OP. And "families" is not "kids" anyway.

Again --- learn what the fuck click-bait is.

Our children are part of our family. A very big part.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Of course trolls like you are not interested in facts.

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
.

A regressive righty like Mac1958 just can't stay on track. He is still suffering from ODS.

a wise man would shut the fuck up right about now.

a dumbass or troll will keep on.

your move, chief.

You will keep on then, chief.

i rest my case. back to ignore for the troll.

And the regressive righty goes right on trolling. Nothing new for those who can't argue facts.

 

[iceberg]

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
.

A regressive righty like Mac1958 just can't stay on track. He is still suffering from ODS.

a wise man would shut the fuck up right about now.

a dumbass or troll will keep on.

your move, chief.

You will keep on then, chief.

i rest my case. back to ignore for the troll.

And the regressive righty goes right on trolling. Nothing new for those who can't argue facts.

 

[JakeStarkey]

That is what the Board is asking you, iceberg.