Time to put up or shut up.

[SFC Ollie]

Another one?

 

[Patriot911]

You are COMPLETEY wrong.

When a component is stressed beyond it's load-bearing limit that component can buckle or rupture.

So all of the components buckled or ruptured simultaneously, and then that simultaneous rupturing or buckling repeated several times more? It was in free fall. Perhaps you're neglecting that fact. Even buckling and rupturing columns will still provide resistance. And there is no measurable deformity of WTC 7 just prior to the collapse of the northface roofline.

No matter how many times you tell these fucking truthtards that the interior collapsed BEFORE the exterior. They still have to pretend that everything would HAVE to let go at once.

So I ask again.

What caused everything to let go at the exact same time?

Here's something else you seem to be missing. Those columns were not solid pieces all the way up 47 stories. They were connected together. Those connections could have failed due to stress limits.

Right. All 80 or so columns disconnected on the same x axis, then did so again, and perhaps a couple more times. What would you estimate the probability of this happening would be? And does it matter? Do failing connections offer zero resistance to collapse?

Straw man. Who says they need to "disconnect on the same x axis"? Stupid truthtards.

 

[DiveCon]

You are COMPLETEY wrong.

When a component is stressed beyond it's load-bearing limit that component can buckle or rupture.

So all of the components buckled or ruptured simultaneously, and then that simultaneous rupturing or buckling repeated several times more? It was in free fall. Perhaps you're neglecting that fact. Even buckling and rupturing columns will still provide resistance. And there is no measurable deformity of WTC 7 just prior to the collapse of the northface roofline.

Here's something else you seem to be missing. Those columns were not solid pieces all the way up 47 stories. They were connected together. Those connections could have failed due to stress limits.

Right. All 80 or so columns disconnected on the same x axis, then did so again, and perhaps a couple more times. What would you estimate the probability of this happening would be? And does it matter? Do failing connections offer zero resistance to collapse?

NO, it was a PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE

 

[DiveCon]

Another one?

yeah, another one
several, in fact
that is, if they arent all sock puppets

 

[PhysicsExist]

www.BuildingWhat.org Round 2

 

[tempesta29]

No matter how many times you tell these fucking truthtards that the interior collapsed BEFORE the exterior. They still have to pretend that everything would HAVE to let go at once.

I still see a roof on WTC 7 when it's collapsing. Are you claiming that the building is just an empty shell when it collapses?

So I ask again.

What caused everything to let go at the exact same time?

Explosives. Pay attention.

Straw man. Who says they need to "disconnect on the same x axis"? Stupid truthtards.

The building collapsed straight down, meaning all column connections failed simultaneously on the same given horizontal axis, or x axis.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Another one?

yeah, another one
several, in fact
that is, if they arent all sock puppets

Probably are.

 

[SFC Ollie]

No matter how many times you tell these fucking truthtards that the interior collapsed BEFORE the exterior. They still have to pretend that everything would HAVE to let go at once.

I still see a roof on WTC 7 when it's collapsing. Are you claiming that the building is just an empty shell when it collapses?

So I ask again.

What caused everything to let go at the exact same time?

Explosives. Pay attention.

Straw man. Who says they need to "disconnect on the same x axis"? Stupid truthtards.

The building collapsed straight down, meaning all column connections failed simultaneously on the same given horizontal axis, or x axis.

What happened to the penthouse?

 

[DiveCon]

No matter how many times you tell these fucking truthtards that the interior collapsed BEFORE the exterior. They still have to pretend that everything would HAVE to let go at once.

I still see a roof on WTC 7 when it's collapsing. Are you claiming that the building is just an empty shell when it collapses?



Explosives. Pay attention.

Straw man. Who says they need to "disconnect on the same x axis"? Stupid truthtards.

The building collapsed straight down, meaning all column connections failed simultaneously on the same given horizontal axis, or x axis.

What happened to the penthouse?

troofers want to ignore that part

 

[tempesta29]

What happened to the penthouse?

Is this a rhetorical question meant to prove a point? Or did you genuinely believe I didn't know about the collapse of the east penthouse?

 

[DiveCon]

What happened to the penthouse?

Is this a rhetorical question meant to prove a point? Or did you genuinely believe I didn't know about the collapse of the east penthouse?

then why do you ignore it?

 

[Patriot911]

No matter how many times you tell these fucking truthtards that the interior collapsed BEFORE the exterior. They still have to pretend that everything would HAVE to let go at once.

I still see a roof on WTC 7 when it's collapsing. Are you claiming that the building is just an empty shell when it collapses?

Really? Maybe you should watch the videos again. Not only do you see the penthouse collapse down into the building, but when the building collapses, dust comes up OUT of the top of the building. The only way it can do that is if the middle is pretty much gone.

So I ask again.

What caused everything to let go at the exact same time?

Explosives. Pay attention.

OK, so all columns had explosives wired up to them to explode them at the same time. The NIST determined that the minimum amount of explosives needed to break column 79 would have been the same as a gun shot right next to you a half a mile away from the explosive going off in an urban setting. So imagine how loud the explosion would be with ALL the columns being blown at one time? Yet what do we hear? Barely the collapse. How is THAT possible? You can't even claim thermate or thermite as they don't have the timing to make everything go at once even if you COULD get thermate or thermite to cut sideways.

Then you have to explain how none of the columns showed signs of being cut by explosives. Or how there were no blasting caps. Or how they managed to wire all the columns without a single person in the building noticing. Or how they kept the explosives from cooking off in the fires that burned for over six hours.

Then you have to explain how there was no seismic evidence of these explosives going off. Lamont Doherty is only a dozen miles away and is VERY sensitive. That many explosives going off on columns embedded deep into the ground is GOING to shake the ground...... yet it doesn't.

Straw man. Who says they need to "disconnect on the same x axis"? Stupid truthtards.

The building collapsed straight down, meaning all column connections failed simultaneously on the same given horizontal axis, or x axis.

More wisdom from the truthtard who isn't an engineer or anything other than a truthtard pulling shit out of his ass. A shame none of your made up shit is worth a damn.

 

[PhysicsExist]

No matter how many times you tell these fucking truthtards that the interior collapsed BEFORE the exterior. They still have to pretend that everything would HAVE to let go at once.

I still see a roof on WTC 7 when it's collapsing. Are you claiming that the building is just an empty shell when it collapses?

Really? Maybe you should watch the videos again. Not only do you see the penthouse collapse down into the building, but when the building collapses, dust comes up OUT of the top of the building. The only way it can do that is if the middle is pretty much gone.


OK, so all columns had explosives wired up to them to explode them at the same time. The NIST determined that the minimum amount of explosives needed to break column 79 would have been the same as a gun shot right next to you a half a mile away from the explosive going off in an urban setting. So imagine how loud the explosion would be with ALL the columns being blown at one time? Yet what do we hear? Barely the collapse. How is THAT possible? You can't even claim thermate or thermite as they don't have the timing to make everything go at once even if you COULD get thermate or thermite to cut sideways.

Then you have to explain how none of the columns showed signs of being cut by explosives. Or how there were no blasting caps. Or how they managed to wire all the columns without a single person in the building noticing. Or how they kept the explosives from cooking off in the fires that burned for over six hours.

Then you have to explain how there was no seismic evidence of these explosives going off. Lamont Doherty is only a dozen miles away and is VERY sensitive. That many explosives going off on columns embedded deep into the ground is GOING to shake the ground...... yet it doesn't.

Straw man. Who says they need to "disconnect on the same x axis"? Stupid truthtards.

The building collapsed straight down, meaning all column connections failed simultaneously on the same given horizontal axis, or x axis.

More wisdom from the truthtard who isn't an engineer or anything other than a truthtard pulling shit out of his ass. A shame none of your made up shit is worth a damn.

this is a controlled demolition

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIbqaybkbWI[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

I still see a roof on WTC 7 when it's collapsing. Are you claiming that the building is just an empty shell when it collapses?

Really? Maybe you should watch the videos again. Not only do you see the penthouse collapse down into the building, but when the building collapses, dust comes up OUT of the top of the building. The only way it can do that is if the middle is pretty much gone.


OK, so all columns had explosives wired up to them to explode them at the same time. The NIST determined that the minimum amount of explosives needed to break column 79 would have been the same as a gun shot right next to you a half a mile away from the explosive going off in an urban setting. So imagine how loud the explosion would be with ALL the columns being blown at one time? Yet what do we hear? Barely the collapse. How is THAT possible? You can't even claim thermate or thermite as they don't have the timing to make everything go at once even if you COULD get thermate or thermite to cut sideways.

Then you have to explain how none of the columns showed signs of being cut by explosives. Or how there were no blasting caps. Or how they managed to wire all the columns without a single person in the building noticing. Or how they kept the explosives from cooking off in the fires that burned for over six hours.

Then you have to explain how there was no seismic evidence of these explosives going off. Lamont Doherty is only a dozen miles away and is VERY sensitive. That many explosives going off on columns embedded deep into the ground is GOING to shake the ground...... yet it doesn't.

The building collapsed straight down, meaning all column connections failed simultaneously on the same given horizontal axis, or x axis.

More wisdom from the truthtard who isn't an engineer or anything other than a truthtard pulling shit out of his ass. A shame none of your made up shit is worth a damn.

this is a controlled demolition

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIbqaybkbWI[/ame]

holy shit, did you even listen to what the guys said in that

you are a fucking LOON

 

[PhysicsExist]

Really? Maybe you should watch the videos again. Not only do you see the penthouse collapse down into the building, but when the building collapses, dust comes up OUT of the top of the building. The only way it can do that is if the middle is pretty much gone.


OK, so all columns had explosives wired up to them to explode them at the same time. The NIST determined that the minimum amount of explosives needed to break column 79 would have been the same as a gun shot right next to you a half a mile away from the explosive going off in an urban setting. So imagine how loud the explosion would be with ALL the columns being blown at one time? Yet what do we hear? Barely the collapse. How is THAT possible? You can't even claim thermate or thermite as they don't have the timing to make everything go at once even if you COULD get thermate or thermite to cut sideways.

Then you have to explain how none of the columns showed signs of being cut by explosives. Or how there were no blasting caps. Or how they managed to wire all the columns without a single person in the building noticing. Or how they kept the explosives from cooking off in the fires that burned for over six hours.

Then you have to explain how there was no seismic evidence of these explosives going off. Lamont Doherty is only a dozen miles away and is VERY sensitive. That many explosives going off on columns embedded deep into the ground is GOING to shake the ground...... yet it doesn't.


More wisdom from the truthtard who isn't an engineer or anything other than a truthtard pulling shit out of his ass. A shame none of your made up shit is worth a damn.

this is a controlled demolition

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIbqaybkbWI[/ame]

holy shit, did you even listen to what the guys said in that

you are a fucking LOON

Did you use your eyeballs and watch a steel highrise collapse at freefall speeds for 2.25 seconds? Yes.

 

[DiveCon]

this is a controlled demolition

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIbqaybkbWI

holy shit, did you even listen to what the guys said in that

you are a fucking LOON

Did you use your eyeballs and watch a steel highrise collapse at freefall speeds for 2.25 seconds? Yes.

you prove once again that you are a fucking moron

do continue, its too fucking funny

 

[HUGGY]

holy shit, did you even listen to what the guys said in that

you are a fucking LOON

Did you use your eyeballs and watch a steel highrise collapse at freefall speeds for 2.25 seconds? Yes.

you prove once again that you are a fucking moron

do continue, its too fucking funny

Pussy.

 

[DiveCon]

Did you use your eyeballs and watch a steel highrise collapse at freefall speeds for 2.25 seconds? Yes.

you prove once again that you are a fucking moron

do continue, its too fucking funny

Pussy.

yeah, is that the best ya got, diaper boy?

 

[eots]

holy shit, did you even listen to what the guys said in that

You are a fucking loon

did you use your eyeballs and watch a steel highrise collapse at freefall speeds for 2.25 seconds? Yes.

you prove once again that you are a fucking moron

Do continue, its too fucking funny

poor little retarded divecon certainly is a case...endless hours and thousand of post like this..he rarely trys to refute anything posted except with some childish...no its not liar..type response without offering any as to why...it is not or simply name calling and not addressing anything directly.. Many of his post consist of 5 or 6 words...often the same words.....he does not think twoofers are taken seriously by anyone...what would motivate him ?

 

[PhysicsExist]

you prove once again that you are a fucking moron

do continue, its too fucking funny

Pussy.

yeah, is that the best ya got, diaper boy?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkqgs68A6a8[/ame]