Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Gamolon]

he is so delusional he should be locked up for his own protection

He could easily call the manufacturer to talk to them about it, but he is too much of a chickenshit. He KNOWS what the answer will be.

i have no doubts he already has, and didnt like what they told him
the man has admitted to harassing 9/11 victim families before

Easy question Chris.

Were the express elevators able to carry 50 people and were they rated at 10,000 lbs. each?

Yes or no?

Here are the facts:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/innovation2.html
http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/twintowers/facts/facts.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34255,00.html
http://science.howstuffworks.com/wtc2.htm
http://www.theharrowgroup.com/articles/20020401/WTC_facts.htm

Including the in-depth discussion from this magazine:
http://www.elevator-world.com/magazine/archive01/9805-003.html-ssi

 

[Christophera]

Your elevator diversion does not prove the steel core columns like the images of the core on 9-11 prove concrete. Square area or passenger numbers cannot prove a steel core.

If there were a steel core there would be structural steel standing left of the spire. What stands is far too thick and solid with the wrong color to be steel.

 

[Gamolon]

Your elevator diversion does not prove the steel core columns like the images of the core on 9-11 prove concrete. Square area or passenger numbers cannot prove a steel core.

If there were a steel core there would be structural steel standing left of the spire. What stands is far too thick and solid with the wrong color to be steel.

Answer the question Chris. Were the express elevators 55 person capacity, 10,000 lb. elevators.

Yes or no?

 

[Fizz]

Your elevator diversion does not prove the steel core columns like the images of the core on 9-11 prove concrete.

yes it does.

it proves your concrete core is impossible.

the fact that you are still alive after trying to expose "perpetrators" that already killed 300 people proves you are wrong.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

He could easily call the manufacturer to talk to them about it, but he is too much of a chickenshit. He KNOWS what the answer will be.

i have no doubts he already has, and didnt like what they told him
the man has admitted to harassing 9/11 victim families before

Easy question Chris.

Were the express elevators able to carry 50 people and were they rated at 10,000 lbs. each?

Yes or no?

Here are the facts:
NOVA Online | Why the Towers Fell | Towers of Innovation | PBS
Discovery Channel :: Inside the Twin Towers: World Trade Center Facts
FOXNews.com - World Trade Center Facts - U.S. & World
HowStuffWorks "World Trade Center Elevators"
World Trade Center Facts

Including the in-depth discussion from this magazine:
Elevator World Magazine -- May 1998

But none of these links were in the documentary Chri$$y so clearly remembers although there is no record of air date. author or producer.

 

[Christophera]

The existence of the documetary is confirmed by Dr. Ron Larsen, Ph.D. who conducted a search for it with a former Marine Major. They found record of it in some very large libraries video indexes, old paper copy and a VHS that was copied and sent 3 times, but apparently intercepted.

This .mp3 is of one of his web radio shows that I co hosted. He provides an update or conclusion to his search.

http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3

The independently verified evidence is more than is needed.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[DiveCon]

<lies and delusions deleted>

seek out professional psychiatric help

 

[Fizz]

they must not have had to search too hard. its all available on youtube.

did you figure out a way to fit all those elevators inside your impossible concrete core yet?!!

 

[Gamolon]

The existence of the documetary is confirmed by Dr. Ron Larsen, Ph.D. who conducted a search for it with a former Marine Major. They found record of it in some very large libraries video indexes, old paper copy and a VHS that was copied and sent 3 times, but apparently intercepted.

This .mp3 is of one of his web radio shows that I co hosted. He provides an update or conclusion to his search.

http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3

The independently verified evidence is more than is needed.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Where the express elevators of the towers rated for 55 people and 10,000 lbs.?

Yes or no Chris?

 

[Christophera]

The youtube referred to is not the 2 hour documentary I saw in 1990. The edited 2003 PBS video is not the video I saw in 1990.

Elevator questions are simply evasion.

Agents have no evidence of steel core columns.

The only core that can be proven with evidence is the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Christophera]

The youtube referred to is not the 2 hour documentary I saw in 1990. The edited 2003 PBS video is not the video I saw in 1990.

Elevator questions are simply evasion.

Agents have no evidence of steel core columns.

The only core that can be proven with evidence is the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

you are correct. it is not.

thats because there never was a documentary that showed a CONCRETE core made with C4 coated rebar and all the other widly stupid shit you claim!!

 

[Fizz]

oh... and here's some steel core columns you are lying about and saying there is no evidence of... YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!

here's pictures of the actual steel core.

...and here's a picture of the same object you continually post that ISNT convered in smoke and you can clearly see it is steel, not concrete.

"For a combination of historical, cultural and economic reasons, tall, concrete-core buildings dedicated to office use are unusual in New York, where builders prefer the wallboard-enclosed cores with steel frames that Mr. Robertson pioneered in the trade center."
New York Timeshere


"Engineers are still debating whether the Twin Towers' unique structure should be credited for surviving the initial crashes, or blamed for collapsing in the subsequent fires, or both. But the point is that it was unique, utilizing closely spaced columns connected to a steel core by relatively lightweight floor trusses. "
Newsweek. Newsweek.com


"Each of the towers, more than 200 ft. wide on each side, contained a central steel core surrounded by open office space. Eighteen-inch steel tubes ran vertically along the outside, providing much of the support for the building"
Time Magazine.TIME.com


"The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any masonry. Worried that the intense air pressure created by the building's high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core. "
engineering.comENGINEERING.com


"Like many high-rises built in the 1960s, the Twin Towers were constructed with their weight distributed between a hollow steel core (containing services like elevators) and steel columns around the perimeter, maximizing open floor space. Many believe the older high-rise design, in which steel columns are often encased in concrete, is more fire resistant.

“A lot of people have told me, ‘You should have used more concrete in the structure,’” said Robertson. However, his chart plotting the strength of steel vs. concrete at various temperatures showed that at the incendiary levels that raged in the towers, the two materials become similarly weak."
Berkeley 04.17.2002 - World Trade Center remembered


"Yamasaki has switched from concrete, his favorite medium, to steel because of the sheer height of the towers, and instead of having the weight of the structure carried by the frame and the elevator core, the great steel columns of the exterior walls will support it."
Time Magazine article from 1964!! Art: Onward & Upward - TIME

 

[Gamolon]

TElevator questions are simply evasion.

Did the twin towers have express elevators that were rated for 55 people and 10,000 lbs.?

Yes or no.

If it's simply evasion like you claim, you'd answer the questions and not worry about the answer or what it could mean.

Why are you so afraid to answer a simple questions Chris? Are you, perhaps, afraid of something?

 

[Christophera]

You evasion is noted. Whay haven't you posted an iomage of this structure on 9-11?

WHY? What is with you? Your misrepresentaitons are very inadequate. WHY haven't you shown us images from 9-11 with the needed diagonal braces in the core area. WHY! No gusset plates either. WHY?

 

[Fizz]

You evasion is noted. Whay haven't you posted an iomage of this structure on 9-11?

WHY? What is with you? Your misrepresentaitons are very inadequate. WHY haven't you shown us images from 9-11 with the needed diagonal braces in the core area. WHY! No gusset plates either. WHY?

look up three posts, you fucking moron!!

 

[DiveCon]

You evasion is noted. Whay haven't you posted an iomage of this structure on 9-11?

WHY? What is with you? Your misrepresentaitons are very inadequate. WHY haven't you shown us images from 9-11 with the needed diagonal braces in the core area. WHY! No gusset plates either. WHY?

you can keep showing everyone you are a delusional fucktard by repeatedly claiming it hasnt been done, when anyone can see it has

 

[Gamolon]

You evasion is noted. Whay haven't you posted an iomage of this structure on 9-11?

Did the twin towers have express elevators that were rated for 55 people and 10,000 lbs.?

Yes or no.

If it's simply evasion like you claim, you'd answer the questions and not worry about the answer or what it could mean.

Why are you so afraid to answer a simple questions Chris? Are you, perhaps, afraid of something?

 

[Christophera]

Agent gumjob thinks that the elevator issue is of substance compared to DIRECT evidence showing that agents MISREPRESENT construction photos. This image shows butt plates on the tops of the vertical steel.

Butt plates are far too weak to use in joining steel core columns". They are used to join elevator guide rail support steel because they allow shifting of the upper section when the holes are elongated.

Your elevator query is subterfuge. You work to evade and change the subject from the core.

This is an end view of a massive concrete wall left of an interior box column.

The west end of WTC 1 concrete core.

 

[DiveCon]

Agent gumjob thinks that the elevator issue is of substance compared to DIRECT evidence showing that agents MISREPRESENT construction photos. This image shows butt plates on the tops of the vertical steel.

Butt plates are far too weak to use in joining steel core columns". They are used to join elevator guide rail support steel because they allow shifting of the upper section when the holes are elongated.



Your elevator query is subterfuge. You work to evade and change the subject from the core.

This is an end view of a massive concrete wall left of an interior box column.



The west end of WTC 1 concrete core.

PROVE they are butt plates?
cause they arent
you dipshit
it has been proven they are LUGS on the sides
also, where is your proof of "elevator guide rail steel"?
havent seen that either