To what extent does the ordinary Arab world support ISIS?

Obviously, the percentage of those supporting ISIS is far too high to warrant accepting refugees especially from the most effected states as Europe is finding out.

Most rats are harmless, but I wouldn't want them in my house either.

Trump is right.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Obviously, the percentage of those supporting ISIS is far too high to warrant accepting refugees especially from the most effected states as Europe is finding out.

Most rats are harmless, but I wouldn't want them in my house either.

Trump is right.


Stated like the imbecile that you are.....Europe did NOT do any vetting of refugees....the U.S. will....

If the US follows Trump's banning of ANY Muslims, expect Arabs and other Muslims to back ISIS much more than they are currently.
 
Stated like the imbecile that you are.....Europe did NOT do any vetting of refugees....the U.S. will....

If the US follows Trump's banning of ANY Muslims, expect Arabs and other Muslims to back ISIS much more than they are currently.
That's an insanely tired mantra used by the European left that has obviously backfired, and badly. Some selected refugees should be accommodated, but there's no way in hell you can let 1000s of young men in from areas where failed governments can't supply sufficient information on them even if they were inclined to do so.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
but there's no way in hell you can let 1000s of young men in from areas where failed governments can't supply sufficient information on them even if they were inclined to do so.


....and exactly WHO in the US is allowing "1000s of young [Muslim] men within our shores???
 
Last edited:
but there's no way in hell you can let 1000s of young men in from areas where failed governments can't supply sufficient information on them even if they were inclined to do so.


....and exactly WHO in theUS is allowing "1000s of young [Muslim] men within our shores???
Not Trump, which is kind of the point. Obviously the Beast would.
 
The easy answer to your premise is simply...

How many Mid-East armies do you see engaged in fighting ISIS?

The answer to that defines the amount of regional support ISIS has.
 
Not Trump, which is kind of the point. Obviously the Beast would.


Obviously????? Did you hear that from Sean Hannity?
No Fox here:
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton called for a sharp increase in the number of Syrian refugees the U.S. accepts, up to 65,000 from the current level of between 5,000 and 10,000.

The former secretary of state’s appeal to raise the cap on Syrian refugees came asSecretary of State John Kerry announced in Berlin that the U.S. will increase the number of refugees it accepts to 100,000 in fiscal year 2017, up from 70,000 a year currently.

“I want the United States to lead the world,” she said during an appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “The United States has to do more,” she said. She said the U.S. needs to react more vigorously to the stream of millions of refugees from Syria pouring into Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, and more recently into Europe.
Hillary Clinton: U.S. Should Accept 65,000 Syrian Refugees
 
We need more of these surveys since it would be moronic to pool ALL Muslims as terrorists; an idiotic contention by the equally idiotic Trump. We NEED the intelligence and help from Islamic communities to defeat ISIS. Check this survey out, please.

What do ordinary citizens in the Arab world really think about the Islamic State?
It never happened. Trump never said all Muslims are terrorists. Your horrific lies are pathetic. Desperation is setting in for the looney libs.
 
All of which are fighting within their own borders. Others have not supported their efforts with significant forces. Consequently, the question becomes. Why aren't they.

Would (or, shouldn't) you also ask why aren't British, Australian, French,German, etc, forces not engaged in fighting ISIS?
 
Not Trump, which is kind of the point. Obviously the Beast would.


Obviously????? Did you hear that from Sean Hannity?
No Fox here:
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton called for a sharp increase in the number of Syrian refugees the U.S. accepts, up to 65,000 from the current level of between 5,000 and 10,000.

The former secretary of state’s appeal to raise the cap on Syrian refugees came asSecretary of State John Kerry announced in Berlin that the U.S. will increase the number of refugees it accepts to 100,000 in fiscal year 2017, up from 70,000 a year currently.

“I want the United States to lead the world,” she said during an appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “The United States has to do more,” she said. She said the U.S. needs to react more vigorously to the stream of millions of refugees from Syria pouring into Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, and more recently into Europe.
Hillary Clinton: U.S. Should Accept 65,000 Syrian Refugees


True......any mention of the strict vetting that will be done on these refugees? Yer or No?
 
All of which are fighting within their own borders. Others have not supported their efforts with significant forces. Consequently, the question becomes. Why aren't they.

Would (or, shouldn't) you also ask why aren't British, Australian, French,German, etc, forces not engaged in fighting ISIS?

No, since this thread is about ARAB involvement. Of course the muslims are trying to make those states "Arab" as well.
 
It never happened. Trump never said all Muslims are terrorists. Your horrific lies are pathetic. Desperation is setting in for the looney libs

:
They’re pouring in, and we don’t know what we’re doing” said Donald Trump on Tuesday, speaking of the flow of Muslims into America via immigration (both legal and illegal), visitation, and refugee admission...Reiterating his call for the suspension of foreign Muslims entering the US
 
No, since this thread is about ARAB involvement. Of course the muslims are trying to make those states "Arab" as well.


NO, the thread is NOT about Arab involvement.......Its about ordinary Arabs' support of ISIS.......Reading English is a tough task for you.but there IS a difference between "involvement" and "support"......
 
No, since this thread is about ARAB involvement. Of course the muslims are trying to make those states "Arab" as well.


NO, the thread is NOT about Arab involvement.......Its about ordinary Arabs' support of ISIS.......Reading English is a tough task for you.but there IS a difference between "involvement" and "support"......

Indeed. There is also a difference between ass and hat, but not in your specific case.
 
Indeed. There is also a difference between ass and hat, but not in your specific case.


You could have just skipped answering since you're only admitting that you're an idiot.....But, alas, here you are INSISTING that you should be labeled an idiot.....masochism is terrible, isn't it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top