Have you noticed?

Who says it can't be both? And why do soft debators like you and PredFan pretend as if you don't know what is meant by it. I mean it's pretty fucking self explanatory guys. Assault rifle, a rifle used to assault someone. You pussies get bogged down on words because you don't really want to address the availability of firearms being the cause of why we have so many more shootings in comparison to the rest of the developed world.
In living memory, kids could take shooting classes in school with live ammo. Schools were not getting shot up. Guns were routinely seen in racks in pickups. Bars and malls were not getting shot up. You could order a gun and ammo from a catalog and have it shipped to your house, no questions asked. People were not afraid to hold a neighborhood BBQ.

What's changed? Not guns. They are less easily obtained today than back in the day yet more people are getting shot.
 
Not in the real world. Your nonsense has been debunked too many times to count.

In the REAL world, we restrict gun ownership. That's why, in the REAL world - OUTSIDE of the USA, our levels of gun crime, murder, gun suicide, and injuries from being shot are almost non-existant outside of the USA.

Every study done OUTSIDE the USA, debunks all of the bullshit being fed to Americans by the NRA, but Americans are obsessed with their guns.
 
In living memory, kids could take shooting classes in school with live ammo. Schools were not getting shot up.
Ok, what the fuck does that have to do with now? Things change. We address problems for these times not times long passed.
Guns were routinely seen in racks in pickups. Bars and malls were not getting shot up. You could order a gun and ammo from a catalog and have it shipped to your house, no questions asked. People were not afraid to hold a neighborhood BBQ.
And you could buy a coke .5c. Again, so fucking what?
What's changed? Not guns. They are less easily obtained today than back in the day yet more people are getting shot.
Who gives a shit? Can't really shoot anyone else without them. I don't care what's changed. They always had the potential for this level of violence and in many ways they did. You didn't have school shootings but you did have public picnics around public lynchings. Their capacity for violence and terror can be seen throughout all of American history. You're simply choosing to be blind to it.
 
I don't want someone who thinks people as 'black savages' having being suitable to have a gun...

That is you...

You show us that you think you can shoot black people who you think is a savage...

So when they say 'they are coming to my guns...'. In your case they have good reason..
And you think black skin legalizes any form of violence and crime. That's you.
 
I guess in yer limited capacity to maintain the Lies from the left
BLM's recent statement that they DON'T want Harris as either a candidate
or replacing Biden.Blacks don't cotton her.
Plus her record as some tough California Prosecutor is
bogus.The Right needs to push the point and demand they
are shown cases Harris Prosecuted and just how sterling a
Prosecutor she was.Really ... Truly ... Shirley

The hysteria on the right is very heartening indeed.

Trump has already filed suit against Harris. The guy who accuses others of conducting "lawfare" against him, has filed suit over Biden's transfer of his campaign donations to Harris. Trump has no standing to sue the Democratic Party.

Trump has also complained to the US MSM networks demanding "equal time" to respond to President Biden's speech to the American people. That's all Trump is good for - whining like a little girl over all of the unfairness being inflicted on a man born to wealth and privilege.

What do you fools see in this fat, stupid old asshole?????
 
President Trump was shot at in an attempted assassination. I have even heard that the gunman used an "AR type" weap[on, whatever that means.

Have you noticed that not one Trump supporter has called for a ban on guns, or tougher gun restrictions?

Why, well three reasons:

1. Our Constitutional rights are more important than anything else.
2. We blame the shooter, not the gun. The gun didn't crawl onto the roof and shoot at Trump.
3. We aren't idiots.
4. We aren't pussies.

President Trump was shot at in an attempted assassination. I have even heard that the gunman used an "AR type" weap[on, whatever that means.

Have you noticed that not one Trump supporter has called for a ban on guns, or tougher gun restrictions?

Why, well three reasons:

1. Our Constitutional rights are more important than anything else.
2. We blame the shooter, not the gun. The gun didn't crawl onto the roof and shoot at Trump.
3. We aren't idiots.
4. We aren't pussies.
That pesky Constitution is such an annoyance to Dems/ Socialists.
 
Yeah, she was a special person. Sitting having a drink and got hit in the back. Died on the way to the hospital.
1000002533.png
 
Ok, what the fuck does that have to do with now? Things change. We address problems for these times not times long passed.

And you could buy a coke .5c. Again, so fucking what?

Who gives a shit? Can't really shoot anyone else without them. I don't care what's changed. They always had the potential for this level of violence and in many ways they did. You didn't have school shootings but you did have public picnics around public lynchings. Their capacity for violence and terror can be seen throughout all of American history. You're simply choosing to be blind to it.
The point, which you apparently are oblivious to, is that getting rid of guns only addresses a symptom of the real problem, which will simply find another outlet for itself. You might as well think putting a band-aid on a tumor gets rid of the cancer.
 
The point, which you apparently are oblivious to, is that getting rid of guns only addresses a symptom of the real problem, which will simply find another outlet for itself. You might as well think putting a band-aid on a tumor gets rid of the cancer.
The real problem is people having access to guns. Whether they were militias of slavers, gangs of white kkk on citizen patrols, black inner city criminals, or troubled teens. The original rationale for having them was given to us by tyrants and it was irrational and nonsensical.
 

Forum List

Back
Top