Today is a watermark day. The day the progressives/liberals begin their decline...

[healthmyths]

Gasp! A peaceful demonstration? How dare they have free speech! Burn them all!

How dare they, they have the backing of people like George Soros. Here I list just a little bit of his power:
Who owns the Democratic/ Progressive Party? Well, here it is.

George Soros is one of the most powerful men on earth. A New York hedge fund manager, he has amassed a personal fortune estimated at about $13 billion (as of 2009). His company, Soros Fund Management, controls at least another $25 billion in investor assets. Since 1979, Soros's foundation network -- whose flagship is the Open Society Foundations (OSF) -- has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. With assets of $1.93 billion as of 2008, OSI alone donates scores of millions of dollars annually to these various groups.

"The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It is a network of radicals dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive. The leader of these radicals is ... George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that control.... It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times, and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit. In 2003, Soros set up a network of privately-owned groups which acts as a shadow or mirror image of the Party. It performs all the functions we would normally expect the real Democratic Party to perform, such as shaping the Party platform, fielding candidates, running campaigns, and so forth. However, it performs these functions under the private supervision of Mr. Soros and his associates. The Shadow Party derives its power from its ability to raise huge sums of money. By controlling the Democrat purse strings, the Shadow Party can make or break any Democrat candidate by deciding whether or not to fund him. During the 2004 election cycle, the Shadow Party raised more than $300 million for Democrat candidates, prompting one of its operatives, MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser, to declare, 'Now it’s our party. We bought it, we own it…'"View attachment 220617

Kochs are spending $400 million this cycle.
Do you think Soros + Steyer come anywhere close to that?

Do you think Jeff Bezos who OWNS The Washington Post has any influence on politics?

Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life
by Paul Bedard
| May 11, 2016 11:51 AM

The Washington Post has built a sizable army of reporters to dig into every facet of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's life, urged on by new owner Jeff Bezos to reveal everything about the potential nominees.

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life

Jeff Bezos is now the richest man in modern history

• Jeff Bezos’ fortune just crossed the $150 billion mark, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
• That’s $55 billion richer than Bill Gates, at number two.
• This milestone means Bezos is now the richest man in modern history on an inflation-adjusted basis.

Jeff Bezos is now the richest man in modern history


In review, The Washington Post publishes stories with emotionally loaded headlines such as “Trump escalates China trade war, announces plan for tariffs on $200 billion in products” and in editorials “The Trump administration created this awful border policy. It doesn’t need Congress to fix it.”
When it comes to sourcing they typically utilize credible sources such as Propublica.org, Associated Press, Slate, Princeton.edu, New York Times, wired.com and CNN.
Story selection and editorials tend to favor the left with the Washington Post only endorsing Democratic candidatessince 1976, including Hillary Clinton in the last election.

Overall, we rate The Washington Post Left-Center biased due to story selection that favors the left and factually High due to the use of proper sources. (5/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 6/19/2018)
Washington Post - Media Bias/Fact Check

Washington Post prior to Trump was actually relatively unbiased. Such as Clinton the inauthentic, which all the conservatives cheered. The post has high ratings for factual reporting. Trump had actually praised Bezos and the Post.

Bezos himself doesnt take sides. He never took sides, only donated to non-partisan veterans group. Bezos only donated to DACA after they were attacked; but still refrains from partisan funding.

Refute this then:
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life
by Paul Bedard
| May 11, 2016 11:51 AM

The Washington Post has built a sizable army of reporters to dig into every facet of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's life, urged on by new owner Jeff Bezos to reveal everything about the potential nominees.

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life

 

[dudmuck]

Gasp! A peaceful demonstration? How dare they have free speech! Burn them all!

How dare they, they have the backing of people like George Soros. Here I list just a little bit of his power:
Who owns the Democratic/ Progressive Party? Well, here it is.

George Soros is one of the most powerful men on earth. A New York hedge fund manager, he has amassed a personal fortune estimated at about $13 billion (as of 2009). His company, Soros Fund Management, controls at least another $25 billion in investor assets. Since 1979, Soros's foundation network -- whose flagship is the Open Society Foundations (OSF) -- has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. With assets of $1.93 billion as of 2008, OSI alone donates scores of millions of dollars annually to these various groups.

"The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It is a network of radicals dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive. The leader of these radicals is ... George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that control.... It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times, and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit. In 2003, Soros set up a network of privately-owned groups which acts as a shadow or mirror image of the Party. It performs all the functions we would normally expect the real Democratic Party to perform, such as shaping the Party platform, fielding candidates, running campaigns, and so forth. However, it performs these functions under the private supervision of Mr. Soros and his associates. The Shadow Party derives its power from its ability to raise huge sums of money. By controlling the Democrat purse strings, the Shadow Party can make or break any Democrat candidate by deciding whether or not to fund him. During the 2004 election cycle, the Shadow Party raised more than $300 million for Democrat candidates, prompting one of its operatives, MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser, to declare, 'Now it’s our party. We bought it, we own it…'"View attachment 220617

Kochs are spending $400 million this cycle.
Do you think Soros + Steyer come anywhere close to that?

Do you think Jeff Bezos who OWNS The Washington Post has any influence on politics?

Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life
by Paul Bedard
| May 11, 2016 11:51 AM

The Washington Post has built a sizable army of reporters to dig into every facet of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's life, urged on by new owner Jeff Bezos to reveal everything about the potential nominees.

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life

Jeff Bezos is now the richest man in modern history

• Jeff Bezos’ fortune just crossed the $150 billion mark, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
• That’s $55 billion richer than Bill Gates, at number two.
• This milestone means Bezos is now the richest man in modern history on an inflation-adjusted basis.

Jeff Bezos is now the richest man in modern history


In review, The Washington Post publishes stories with emotionally loaded headlines such as “Trump escalates China trade war, announces plan for tariffs on $200 billion in products” and in editorials “The Trump administration created this awful border policy. It doesn’t need Congress to fix it.”
When it comes to sourcing they typically utilize credible sources such as Propublica.org, Associated Press, Slate, Princeton.edu, New York Times, wired.com and CNN.
Story selection and editorials tend to favor the left with the Washington Post only endorsing Democratic candidatessince 1976, including Hillary Clinton in the last election.

Overall, we rate The Washington Post Left-Center biased due to story selection that favors the left and factually High due to the use of proper sources. (5/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 6/19/2018)
Washington Post - Media Bias/Fact Check

Washington Post prior to Trump was actually relatively unbiased. Such as Clinton the inauthentic, which all the conservatives cheered. The post has high ratings for factual reporting. Trump had actually praised Bezos and the Post.

Bezos himself doesnt take sides. He never took sides, only donated to non-partisan veterans group. Bezos only donated to DACA after they were attacked; but still refrains from partisan funding.

Refute this then:
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life
by Paul Bedard
| May 11, 2016 11:51 AM

The Washington Post has built a sizable army of reporters to dig into every facet of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's life, urged on by new owner Jeff Bezos to reveal everything about the potential nominees.

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life

This correct; occurring after Trump won the primary in may 2016. This is only natural for the final presidential candidate. But more importantly, you'll see there: He also said that the paper is trying to get to the "essence" of Hillary Rodham Clinton

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Gasp! A peaceful demonstration? How dare they have free speech! Burn them all!

How dare they, they have the backing of people like George Soros. Here I list just a little bit of his power:
Who owns the Democratic/ Progressive Party? Well, here it is.

George Soros is one of the most powerful men on earth. A New York hedge fund manager, he has amassed a personal fortune estimated at about $13 billion (as of 2009). His company, Soros Fund Management, controls at least another $25 billion in investor assets. Since 1979, Soros's foundation network -- whose flagship is the Open Society Foundations (OSF) -- has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. With assets of $1.93 billion as of 2008, OSI alone donates scores of millions of dollars annually to these various groups.
View attachment 220617

OLD SCHOOL: The Child Is Father to the Man
NEW AGE: Feminized Mamas' Boys Never Become Men

When we were kids, I played sandlot baseball all summer with Richard Dennis, who came in second to Soros in that financial sector. The only sign of his market genius I saw (and making much of it is a stretch) was that he invented his own rotisserie-type baseball game based on real players' statistics. But people like him usually wound up as slightly nerdy nobodies. For missing his development and many other reasons, I really regret not going to our neighborhood high school instead of the ambitious Jesuit fraud my parents forced me to attend.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

How dare they, they have the backing of people like George Soros. Here I list just a little bit of his power:
Who owns the Democratic/ Progressive Party? Well, here it is.

George Soros is one of the most powerful men on earth. A New York hedge fund manager, he has amassed a personal fortune estimated at about $13 billion (as of 2009). His company, Soros Fund Management, controls at least another $25 billion in investor assets. Since 1979, Soros's foundation network -- whose flagship is the Open Society Foundations (OSF) -- has dispensed more than $5 billion to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. With assets of $1.93 billion as of 2008, OSI alone donates scores of millions of dollars annually to these various groups.

"The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It is a network of radicals dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive. The leader of these radicals is ... George Soros. He has essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his personal control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that control.... It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal times, and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit. In 2003, Soros set up a network of privately-owned groups which acts as a shadow or mirror image of the Party. It performs all the functions we would normally expect the real Democratic Party to perform, such as shaping the Party platform, fielding candidates, running campaigns, and so forth. However, it performs these functions under the private supervision of Mr. Soros and his associates. The Shadow Party derives its power from its ability to raise huge sums of money. By controlling the Democrat purse strings, the Shadow Party can make or break any Democrat candidate by deciding whether or not to fund him. During the 2004 election cycle, the Shadow Party raised more than $300 million for Democrat candidates, prompting one of its operatives, MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser, to declare, 'Now it’s our party. We bought it, we own it…'"View attachment 220617

Kochs are spending $400 million this cycle.
Do you think Soros + Steyer come anywhere close to that?

Do you think Jeff Bezos who OWNS The Washington Post has any influence on politics?

Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life
by Paul Bedard
| May 11, 2016 11:51 AM

The Washington Post has built a sizable army of reporters to dig into every facet of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's life, urged on by new owner Jeff Bezos to reveal everything about the potential nominees.

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life

Jeff Bezos is now the richest man in modern history

• Jeff Bezos’ fortune just crossed the $150 billion mark, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
• That’s $55 billion richer than Bill Gates, at number two.
• This milestone means Bezos is now the richest man in modern history on an inflation-adjusted basis.

Jeff Bezos is now the richest man in modern history


In review, The Washington Post publishes stories with emotionally loaded headlines such as “Trump escalates China trade war, announces plan for tariffs on $200 billion in products” and in editorials “The Trump administration created this awful border policy. It doesn’t need Congress to fix it.”
When it comes to sourcing they typically utilize credible sources such as Propublica.org, Associated Press, Slate, Princeton.edu, New York Times, wired.com and CNN.
Story selection and editorials tend to favor the left with the Washington Post only endorsing Democratic candidatessince 1976, including Hillary Clinton in the last election.

Overall, we rate The Washington Post Left-Center biased due to story selection that favors the left and factually High due to the use of proper sources. (5/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 6/19/2018)
Washington Post - Media Bias/Fact Check

Washington Post prior to Trump was actually relatively unbiased. Such as Clinton the inauthentic, which all the conservatives cheered. The post has high ratings for factual reporting. Trump had actually praised Bezos and the Post.

Bezos himself doesnt take sides. He never took sides, only donated to non-partisan veterans group. Bezos only donated to DACA after they were attacked; but still refrains from partisan funding.

Refute this then:
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life
by Paul Bedard
| May 11, 2016 11:51 AM

The Washington Post has built a sizable army of reporters to dig into every facet of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's life, urged on by new owner Jeff Bezos to reveal everything about the potential nominees.

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.
Washington Post assigns army of 20 to dig into 'every phase' of Trump's life

This correct; occurring after Trump won the primary in may 2016. This is only natural for the final presidential candidate. But more importantly, you'll see there: He also said that the paper is trying to get to the "essence" of Hillary Rodham Clinton

The Scent of Nonsense

The essence of hillary is sold as perfume to the #MeToo lying skanks, giving them their distinct odor. It is distilled from stinkweed.

 

[imawhosure]

Today is a watermark day. The day the progressives/liberals begin their decline...

Lol get ready to get beat over the head for this thread for years to come...starting with this November.

Wanna bet-)

 

[imawhosure]

They should lock all these protesters up.
That is not a peaceful protest.
They are blocking the way for people to walk freely.
They are interrupting people's travel.

Why do you hate America and the American way?

It is not the American way to disrespect other people's rights and property.
democrats aren't going to understand that until they start dying.

Death threats now? I ask again, why do you hate Americans and the American way?

No. Not a threat.
Just a reality of what is to come once the real fighting starts.
Keep turning up the heat, it's not going to end well.

Don't lie, you just said Democrats would die. That's a threat. So you are an American hater and a liar as well.

Must be a tRumpkin.

Oh, now we are threatening you, lol. Your SCREWED, bend over, and enjoy!

 

[AntonToo]

Today is a watermark day. The day the progressives/liberals begin their decline...

Lol get ready to get beat over the head for this thread for years to come...starting with this November.

Wanna bet-)

Yes I do, because if I had a dollar for everytime someone claims liberalism or conservatism is at the end of the road I'd be a very rich man by now.

 

[WEATHER53]

Democrat pursuit of Kavanaugh did not sit well with fence sitters.

 

[francoHFW]

Gasp! A peaceful demonstration? How dare they have free speech! Burn them all!

Yup...just like a little kid with a temper tantrum these juveniles have to have their way to be damned with inconveniencing others. It's my way or no way.

"Peaceful protests"???

WASHINGTON – Nearly 60 people were arrested Thursday after police descended on a crowd of protesters blocking a street and hoping to make a statement against the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

The arrests in the nation's capital not far from the steps of the high court came as thousands rallied across the country in solidarity with university professor Christine Blasey Ford, whose accusations against Kavanaugh fueled outrage on both sides of the controversy.

U.S. Capitol police said 57 of the protesters were arrested for "unlawful demonstration activities'' and another two in the same location were arrested and charged with crossing a police line.59 arrested near Supreme Court as thousands nationwide rally against Kavanaugh nomination


But as I pointed out in the OP.... this is the languishing cries of a dying movement. These people will be growing old and some if not many will be eventually embarrassed about their
juvenile actions. The rest of us adults just have to let these kids have their tantrums.

Meanwhile they are being arrested and becoming ineligible to vote.

B******* it's not felony. Stupid dupes... Guess what the younger generation does not like you LOL

 

[francoHFW]

Democrat pursuit of Kavanaugh did not sit well with fence sitters.

According to b******* propaganda.

 

[francoHFW]

Today is a watermark day. The day the progressives/liberals begin their decline...

Lol get ready to get beat over the head for this thread for years to come...starting with this November.

Wanna bet-)

Yes I do, because if I had a dollar for everytime someone claims liberalism or conservatism is at the end of the road I'd be a very rich man by now.

Progressives and liberals always win in the end... We are way overdue for some progress and liberalism.

 

[AntonToo]

Democrat pursuit of Kavanaugh did not sit well with fence sitters.

Source?

 

[francoHFW]

They should lock all these protesters up.
That is not a peaceful protest.
They are blocking the way for people to walk freely.
They are interrupting people's travel.

So doesn’t a funeral procession . Should we eliminate those too?

You equating this to a progressive funeral?

Yes we know you are brainwashed but this is not that important. Another GOP piece of s***pervert mediocrity. things won't get better until Democrats have Congressional and presidential control for 4 years. Not 30 days.

 

[dudmuck]

Today is a watermark day. The day the progressives/liberals begin their decline...

Lol get ready to get beat over the head for this thread for years to come...starting with this November.

Wanna bet-)

Yes I do, because if I had a dollar for everytime someone claims liberalism or conservatism is at the end of the road I'd be a very rich man by now.

Before an ideology is dead, it must first become abandon. On the conservative side, the GOP has abandoned it, according to a conservative.

On the left, where has liberalism becoming abandoned? The russian trolls are trying, what else?