Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shall not be named Leftard Moderator thinks 74 million people questioning the 2020 Election is a conspiracy, but 4 years of Putin stole the election is perfect discussion in the Politics forum.
And like typical fascism we see so much from the Left these days they must silence all questions.
Shall not be named Leftard Moderator thinks 74 million people questioning the 2020 Election is a conspiracy, but 4 years of Putin stole the election is perfect discussion in the Politics forum.
And like typical fascism we see so much from the Left these days they must silence all questions.
They're just trying to convince each other. Lying to one self is what all leftists must do.These deniers of election fraud all know they are being dishonest when they tell you there is no election fraud....every damn one of them even the nameless moderator....
And worth remembering was that Republican legislatures set the count UP that way...so that "day of" ballots would be counted on election eve and early voting and absentee ballots (which were expected to be and were heavily Dem leaning) would be counted later.On Election Night, Donald Trump announced he had won in a landslide. Before half the votes had even been counted.
That's how this bullshit started. With a serious delusion and retarded claim based on no facts.
Nobody gives a shit what you "find hard to believe"g5000 is such a coward. Debate the topic at hand. Of course there was tampering and BS. But we don't have direct proof. I find it hard to believe that so many more voted this year than in 2016 on BOTH sides. Leftists will say.... "where is your proof"?
I respond with, where is your proof that all the mail in ballots were legitimate? I do not believe they were! Was there enough to overturn the election? Unlikely. Was there enough to shadow the election in disgust? Yes.
Shall not be named Leftard Moderator thinks 74 million people questioning the 2020 Election is a conspiracy, but 4 years of Putin stole the election is perfect discussion in the Politics forum.
And like typical fascism we see so much from the Left these days they must silence all questions.
g5000 is such a coward. Debate the topic at hand. Of course there was tampering and BS. But we don't have direct proof. I find it hard to believe that so many more voted this year than in 2016 on BOTH sides. Leftists will say.... "where is your proof"?
I respond with, where is your proof that all the mail in ballots were legitimate? I do not believe they were! Was there enough to overturn the election? Unlikely. Was there enough to shadow the election in disgust? Yes.
REPORTER:"So why did you bring a gun and start shooting"?TRUMP: The moon is made of White American cheese!
PARROTING RUBES: The moon is made of white American cheese!
REPORTER: You don't really believe the moon is made of cheese, do you Mr. President?
TRUMP: Well, a lot of people are saying it is.
Shall not be named Leftard Moderator thinks 74 million people questioning the 2020 Election is a conspiracy, but 4 years of Putin stole the election is perfect discussion in the Politics forum.
And like typical fascism we see so much from the Left these days they must silence all questions.
The problem with all the courts was "standing".g5000 is such a coward. Debate the topic at hand. Of course there was tampering and BS. But we don't have direct proof. I find it hard to believe that so many more voted this year than in 2016 on BOTH sides. Leftists will say.... "where is your proof"?
And they would be correct to ask that. I'll ask it too. In fact the entire world would like to know, particularly Rooty, who trotted into so many courts emptyhanded that his hair started to melt.
Now why is it "hard to believe" that so many more voted in '20 than in '16, when you know damn well that only 55% of eligible voters bothered to vote in '16? Did you actually find a way to not notice all kinds of provisions being made to allow people to vote without risking crowding? I find THAT hard to believe.
I respond with, where is your proof that all the mail in ballots were legitimate? I do not believe they were! Was there enough to overturn the election? Unlikely. Was there enough to shadow the election in disgust? Yes.
If you're claiming they're illegitimate, or that some are, then yours is the burden of proof. Find some and bring it. Absent that you have nothing more than wishful-thinking speculation. It ain't somebody else's job to prove the negative; it's YOURS to prove the assertion.
As for the phrase "shadow the election in disgust", Google Translate doesn't have a clue.
www.foxnews.com
www.afa.net
Is she your personal puppet?Move this crap to the basement @Coyote
Nope they wouldn't hear the evidence...and you know that....Every single judge in every single court laughed Trump's bullshit right out of the building.
There is no case, tards.
Trump lost bigly.
I am not the only one, Herr Lesh. That is the whole point of the thread.Nobody gives a shit what you "find hard to believe"g5000 is such a coward. Debate the topic at hand. Of course there was tampering and BS. But we don't have direct proof. I find it hard to believe that so many more voted this year than in 2016 on BOTH sides. Leftists will say.... "where is your proof"?
I respond with, where is your proof that all the mail in ballots were legitimate? I do not believe they were! Was there enough to overturn the election? Unlikely. Was there enough to shadow the election in disgust? Yes.
I find it hard to believe that you are as dishonest as you are...so...there's that
These deniers of election fraud all know they are being dishonest when they tell you there is no election fraud..
Nope. I don't have the burden of proof. They do. I am not suing them, I am stating an opinion. That no way BOTH sides got that many more votes. To me the process is highly tainted and not transparent enough. I believe people should have to vote in person and show an ID or complete an absentee ballot. But no one cares what I or what 47% of Americans believe?g5000 is such a coward. Debate the topic at hand. Of course there was tampering and BS. But we don't have direct proof. I find it hard to believe that so many more voted this year than in 2016 on BOTH sides. Leftists will say.... "where is your proof"?
And they would be correct to ask that. I'll ask it too. In fact the entire world would like to know, particularly Rooty, who trotted into so many courts emptyhanded that his hair started to melt.
Now why is it "hard to believe" that so many more voted in '20 than in '16, when you know damn well that only 55% of eligible voters bothered to vote in '16? Did you actually find a way to not notice all kinds of provisions being made to allow people to vote without risking crowding? I find THAT hard to believe.
I respond with, where is your proof that all the mail in ballots were legitimate? I do not believe they were! Was there enough to overturn the election? Unlikely. Was there enough to shadow the election in disgust? Yes.
If you're claiming they're illegitimate, or that some are, then yours is the burden of proof. Find some and bring it. Absent that you have nothing more than wishful-thinking speculation. It ain't somebody else's job to prove the negative; it's YOURS to prove the assertion.
As for the phrase "shadow the election in disgust", Google Translate doesn't have a clue.
The problem with all the courts was "standing".g5000 is such a coward. Debate the topic at hand. Of course there was tampering and BS. But we don't have direct proof. I find it hard to believe that so many more voted this year than in 2016 on BOTH sides. Leftists will say.... "where is your proof"?
And they would be correct to ask that. I'll ask it too. In fact the entire world would like to know, particularly Rooty, who trotted into so many courts emptyhanded that his hair started to melt.
Now why is it "hard to believe" that so many more voted in '20 than in '16, when you know damn well that only 55% of eligible voters bothered to vote in '16? Did you actually find a way to not notice all kinds of provisions being made to allow people to vote without risking crowding? I find THAT hard to believe.
I respond with, where is your proof that all the mail in ballots were legitimate? I do not believe they were! Was there enough to overturn the election? Unlikely. Was there enough to shadow the election in disgust? Yes.
If you're claiming they're illegitimate, or that some are, then yours is the burden of proof. Find some and bring it. Absent that you have nothing more than wishful-thinking speculation. It ain't somebody else's job to prove the negative; it's YOURS to prove the assertion.
As for the phrase "shadow the election in disgust", Google Translate doesn't have a clue.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the Supreme Court’s order reads. “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”
It wasn't because there was no EVIDENCE.Supreme Court declines to hear Trump-supported Texas case over election results in four other states
The Supreme Court has denied a Texas effort Friday that would have essentially nullified the presidential elections in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin.
It was STANDING! Texas didn't show how another state's election conduct had any bearing on Texas.
There is PLENTY of Evidence.
Staggering Evidence of 2020 Presidential Election Fraud
View attachment 452524
Staggering Evidence of 2020 Presidential Election Fraud
If America's freedom swings on the hinges of integrity and trust, we need more than WD-40 now.
A topic about the Left silencing the issue the Left come in and immediately try to silence the issue.Is she your personal puppet?Move this crap to the basement @Coyote
The problem with all the courts was "standing".g5000 is such a coward. Debate the topic at hand. Of course there was tampering and BS. But we don't have direct proof. I find it hard to believe that so many more voted this year than in 2016 on BOTH sides. Leftists will say.... "where is your proof"?
And they would be correct to ask that. I'll ask it too. In fact the entire world would like to know, particularly Rooty, who trotted into so many courts emptyhanded that his hair started to melt.
Now why is it "hard to believe" that so many more voted in '20 than in '16, when you know damn well that only 55% of eligible voters bothered to vote in '16? Did you actually find a way to not notice all kinds of provisions being made to allow people to vote without risking crowding? I find THAT hard to believe.
I respond with, where is your proof that all the mail in ballots were legitimate? I do not believe they were! Was there enough to overturn the election? Unlikely. Was there enough to shadow the election in disgust? Yes.
If you're claiming they're illegitimate, or that some are, then yours is the burden of proof. Find some and bring it. Absent that you have nothing more than wishful-thinking speculation. It ain't somebody else's job to prove the negative; it's YOURS to prove the assertion.
As for the phrase "shadow the election in disgust", Google Translate doesn't have a clue.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the Supreme Court’s order reads. “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”
It wasn't because there was no EVIDENCE.Supreme Court declines to hear Trump-supported Texas case over election results in four other states
The Supreme Court has denied a Texas effort Friday that would have essentially nullified the presidential elections in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin.
It was STANDING! Texas didn't show how another state's election conduct had any bearing on Texas.
There is PLENTY of Evidence.
Staggering Evidence of 2020 Presidential Election Fraud
View attachment 452524
Staggering Evidence of 2020 Presidential Election Fraud
If America's freedom swings on the hinges of integrity and trust, we need more than WD-40 now.
You are no longer qualified to speak about Americans. You have left America behind and installed an illegitimate president.By the way. Less than half of Americans bleev the election was stolen.
Half of Republicans bleev that bullshit, but not half of Americans.
Nice try.
