Debate Now Transgenderism is Just A Figment Of The Imagination

No.
Not even close.
Virtually no one is saying that Transgenderism (Gender Dysphoria) is not real.
That is what you want them to believe, and then chastise them for believing it.
The part you are missing is that Transgenderism is rare. Exceedingly rare.
As well as:
An effeminate gay man wearing women's clothing is not transgender. And sure as hell isn't a woman.
A straight or bisexual man wearing women's clothing because he is aroused by it is not transgender. And sure as hell isn't a woman.
But you want to pretend they are. You refuse to distinguish these two sets from actual transgenderism.
And then proceed to chastise those that don't agree.
Also, few transvestites are in fact gay, but if you don't want them around children you're a "homophobe".

Next, they try to browbeat us with recriminations that the laws against grooming are anti-LGBTQWERTY, the underlying premise of said browbeating is that LGBTQWERTY are interested in grooming children.

As outrageously cartoonish as Ayn Rand's antagonists were, she actually underestimated how preposterous the "reasoning" of the neo-Marxist leftbats is.
 
Also, few transvestites are in fact gay, but if you don't want them around children, you're a "homophobe".

Next, they try to browbeat us with recriminations that the laws against grooming are anti-LGBTQWERTY, the underlying premise of said browbeating is that LGBTQWERTY are interested in grooming children.

As outrageously cartoonish as Ayn Rand's antagonists were, she actually underestimated how preposterous the "reasoning" of the neo-Marxist leftbats is.
You managed to drop Ayn, and "marxism".


You've effectively immunized yourself from all possible criticism.
 
You managed to drop Ayn, and "marxism".


You've effectively immunized yourself from all possible criticism.
Lebowski.gif
 
The true essence of the madness is this simple:

As little as 2 years ago if you could ask every person in America above the age of 12 - "what is a woman".
The only reason you would see hesitation in their answer, would be their suspicion as to why are you asking such an obvious question?
Just 2 years later - I would wager that as high as 60% of the population would hesitate out of fear of what price could they pay for giving the answer.

WE ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN.
And we have an administration in office that is facilitating this madness. Giving it both legitimacy, and financial support to organizations to identify and punish those who answer that question correctly.
That is a fact.
 
Are you this big a crashing fucking bore IRL, Peukema?
Yes, he is. Like most people lacking intelligence and education, he has simplified it down to the limits of his understanding. As such, he has reduced his little world down to binary.

There are only two choices to him - being woke or being Maga. He has no ability at all to understand that at least three of us are neither.
 
Yes, he is. Like most people lacking intelligence and education, he has simplified it down to the limits of his understanding. As such, he has reduced his little world down to binary.

There are only two choices to him - being woke or being Maga. He has no ability at all to understand that at least three of us are neither.
Are you actually so unaware as to try to paint ME as the "simple binary" here?
 
No.
Not even close.
Virtually no one is saying that Transgenderism (Gender Dysphoria) is not real.
That is what you want them to believe, and then chastise them for believing it.
The part you are missing is that Transgenderism is rare. Exceedingly rare.
As well as:
An effeminate gay man wearing women's clothing is not transgender. And sure as hell isn't a woman.
A straight or bisexual man wearing women's clothing because he is aroused by it is not transgender. And sure as hell isn't a woman.
But you want to pretend they are. You refuse to distinguish these two sets from actual transgenderism.
And then proceed to chastise those that don't agree.
Perhaps you should study up on Transvestite, Transsexual, among other words before speaking again.
 
I'm not very good with setting up rules as most of you probably already know by now as the only one I can think of is to stay on topic. Anyways, if you guys want proof that Transgenderism does not exist then go ahead and watch this video. For these people don't have an argument for when it comes to being Transgender and then when it comes to being Transracial.



If it's perfectly acceptable to be Transgender even though it goes against biology, then how isn't it perfectly acceptable to be Transracial when it goes against biology as well? I'll tell you why,.. because it allows cheaters on sport's teams and rapists in the restrooms when you identify as Transgender. Being Transracial doesn't have these benefits. I'm curious if anybody has any further arguments though.



By nature, animals breed. A male impregnates a female. One has a seed, the other an egg. The penis goes into the vagina and that is known as sex. Ok, salmon lay the eggs and the male spreads the seeds over the eggs

Beyond that, anal, cunnilingus, 69, scat, blow job etc.. are, in Clinton's words, "Inappropriate behaviour", or also known as fetishes. So a biological male dressing and trying to pretend to a woman, and vice versa, is simply a fetish.

When a guy wants to grow tits and has his cock cut off, is just as bad as a female wanting her tits cut off thinking they're changing sex.

So whether someone is suffering from schizophrenia, paedophila, bipolar, trans, gay etc.. it's all mental, it's all an illness. And those trying to push trans as normal is simply a mental illness.
 
But it isn't new.

We used to call them She-males and they have been around for a long time

The difference here is they used to be exceeding rare, they did not have big corporations promoting them, they were not a common topic of conversation, people were not given jobs solely on the basis of being one, and there was no such thing as a child tranny.
 

Forum List

Back
Top