NY vs Trump Stormy Daniels case is starting to crumble

[Smokin' OP]

Well, for there to be a “teabagger”, there needs to be a “teabagee”. That makes you the teabagee…

WTF?

I didn't give them teabags.
Maybe their mother did.

 

[j-mac]

WTF?

I didn't give them teabags.
Maybe their mother did.

View attachment 944502


View attachment 944503

Seriously?

 

[Care4all]

When it appeared Trump was not able to pay his baseless judgement, people on the left wanted his buildings seized.

Trump won in court against Daniels. Daniels lost and owes Trump $640k. She said she will not pay.

Her property should be seized to pay Trump.

That is consistent application of the law.

If you wanted Trump to pay, but not Daniels, you are a cult fuck with lack or any morals or principals.

You are also likely vax injured. Maybe that is the excuse.

Fake News

As she answered Under Oath in court, she will pay, when the case is over...indicating an appeal process is not complete.

 

[dudmuck]

You shot cultists.

Why are you ignoring the fact that TRUMP WON IN COURT. STORMY DANIELS LOST AND A COURT ORDERED HER TO PAY TRUMP $640,000.

She says she will go to jail before she pays. When is her property going to be seized to pay Trump the legal judgement HE WON?

You guys were all happy that Trump might have assets seized.

So you guys want Daniels’ property seized to pay Trump, right?

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW….RIGHT?

if anyone would collect on that, it would be Letitia James.

 

[BackAgain]

Trump can't do that, idiot.

Yes he can, you imbecile. And he says he did. Retards like you do not get to make up facts and declare such fantasy as being the “truth.”

Try to keep up, moron.

Don’t project so hard. It only makes you look even dumber.

 

[surada]

Alvin Bragg has failed, and the NY vs. Trump case is starting to fall apart. Or as a FOX News anchor just put it a few minutes ago, the case is "starting to crumble."

Good try, libs, you almost got him that time. Maybe next time.

Lawyer for Stormy Daniels denies that payment from Cohen was 'hush money'​

Keith Davidson, lawyer for adult film actress Stormy Daniels, said in court Thursday that the $130,000 payment to Daniels was not “hush money,” but a “consideration” payment.

Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Johsua Steinglass pressed Davidson on the witness stand about Daniels’ statement in January 2018, which Davidson prepared for his client, that denied any relationship with Trump and said that her only interaction with Trump was “a few public appearances and nothing more.”

“Rumors that I have received hush money from Donald Trump are completely false,” the statement says.“I don’t believe that Stormy ever alleged that any interaction with Trump was ‘romantic,‘” Davidson testified Thursday. But it is his understanding that Daniels had a sexual encounter with Trump.

He also said the payment “wasn’t a payoff.”“It wasn’t a payoff. And it wasn’t hush money. It was consideration,” Davidson said. Davidson added that he would never use “hush money” to describe the money exchange.

He would only refer to it as “consideration.” “Consideration” is a contractual legal term for what someone gives in return for the promise to abide by a contract; in this case, money. The payment was labeled "legal fees" in Trump's accounting, which prosecutors allege amounted to fraud.

Steinglass asked about the truthfulness of the Daniels’ statement. Davidson replied, “I think it’s technically true.”

He continues that he doesn’t believe anyone alleged of a relationship between Daniels and Trump -- it was an interaction.Davidson said he believes a “relationship” to be an ongoing occurrence.

NY v. Trump trial to resume with gag order proceedings after judge fines Trump $9k

Experts: Trump lawyer's Stormy Daniels grilling a "complete disaster"

Instead of key question "undermining Daniels, she got the better of the exchange,” says Norm Eisen.

www.salon.com

Hindsight is 2020, but as Judge Juan Merchan explained to Donald Trump’s defense team on Thursday: If you didn’t want a problematic alleged sexual encounter with your client openly discussed in a Manhattan courtroom, you shouldn’t have brought it up on the first day of trial by denying any such interaction ever took place. And when Stormy Daniels began testifying, recounting in excruciating detail her claimed hotel-room rendezvous with the former president, it was the defense counsel’s job to stand up and say what they believed was out of bounds, Merchan said.

 

[JGalt]

Experts: Trump lawyer's Stormy Daniels grilling a "complete disaster"

Instead of key question "undermining Daniels, she got the better of the exchange,” says Norm Eisen.

www.salon.com

Hindsight is 2020, but as Judge Juan Merchan explained to Donald Trump’s defense team on Thursday: If you didn’t want a problematic alleged sexual encounter with your client openly discussed in a Manhattan courtroom, you shouldn’t have brought it up on the first day of trial by denying any such interaction ever took place. And when Stormy Daniels began testifying, recounting in excruciating detail her claimed hotel-room rendezvous with the former president, it was the defense counsel’s job to stand up and say what they believed was out of bounds, Merchan said.

Then she perjured herself and should be charged. That gold-digging whore once signed an affidavit stating she never had sex with Trump.

 

[hadit]

WTF?
The trial isn't over YET, moron.

Seriously, the defense hasn't even started.

 

[hadit]

Thanks to an incompetent, judge on Trump's payroll.

Hold onto that, I hear it makes it easier when the voices get too loud.

 

[para bellum]

Fake News

As she answered Under Oath in court, she will pay, when the case is over...indicating an appeal process is not complete.

Her case is over. The the 9th Circuit upheld the district court's ruling and said it was final. She just refuses to pay.
There is nothing "pending" other than her obeying the court order.
Which she will not do unless compelled.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Yes he can, you imbecile. And he says he did. Retards like you do not get to make up facts and declare such fantasy as being the “truth.”

No, he can't, MORON.

Trump to Hannity: Presidents can declassify documents 'by ...​

Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com › politics › trump-hannity-pr...
Sep 22, 2022 — Former President Donald Trump says he could declassify documents just by "thinking" about it. Trump is facing a criminal probe into whether ...

Presidential Power to Declassify Information, Explained​

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
Sep 22, 2022 — In an interview, Mr. Trump again insisted that “I declassified everything.” He added that as president, “you can declassify just by saying ...

Don’t project so hard. It only makes you look even dumber.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Hold onto that, I hear it makes it easier when the voices get too loud.

Who is Aileen Cannon, Trump-appointed judge overseeing ...​

The Palm Beach Post
https://www.palmbeachpost.com › trump › 2024/04/11
Apr 11, 2024 — From her prosecutorial career to her membership in a national conservative group, here are five things to know about the classified ...


Cannon garnered national attention for her involvement in the classified documents case before she was randomly assigned to oversee it. After the FBI seized records from Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, Cannon granted Trump's request to have a retired judge, called a special master, review the documents for potential personal records. Her decision temporarily prevented investigators from scrutinizing them.

An appeals court initially overturned part of Cannon’s order and allowed authorities to continue investigating the documents during the special master's review. Then, the appeals court overturned Cannon’s order in its entirety.

Everyone knows, Cannon is incompetent.

 

[BackAgain]

No, he can't, MORON.

Yes he can you ignorant bitch.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Yes he can you ignorant bitch.

You're FOS, like your dear leader.

Can Donald Trump declassify documents with just a ...​

Poynter
https://www.poynter.org › fact-checking › can-donald-tr...
Sep 26, 2022 — There's legal precedent that counters Trump's assertion on Fox News that he can 'declassify just by saying it's declassified.'

 

[BackAgain]

You're FOS, like your dear leader.

No. the full of shit none is you.
Stop being an assuole troll.

Again: he has never claimed that he ever declassified anything by just thinking it.

And some legal commentators pretending otherwise doesn’t address the topic since this conversation has been had, already, repeatedly. You go ahead and believe whatever you wish. Your ignorance remains unpersuasive.

ABA Fact Check: Extent of Presidential Legal Authority to Declassify Materials Is Still Unclear

Most national security legal experts dismissed the former president’s suggestion that while in office he could declassify documents simply by thinking about it. But in theory, legal guidelines support his contention that a president has broad authority to formally declassify most documents that...

lawandcrime.com

 

[hadit]

Who is Aileen Cannon, Trump-appointed judge overseeing ...​

View attachment 945143
The Palm Beach Post
https://www.palmbeachpost.com › trump › 2024/04/11
Apr 11, 2024 — From her prosecutorial career to her membership in a national conservative group, here are five things to know about the classified ...


Cannon garnered national attention for her involvement in the classified documents case before she was randomly assigned to oversee it. After the FBI seized records from Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, Cannon granted Trump's request to have a retired judge, called a special master, review the documents for potential personal records. Her decision temporarily prevented investigators from scrutinizing them.

An appeals court initially overturned part of Cannon’s order and allowed authorities to continue investigating the documents during the special master's review. Then, the appeals court overturned Cannon’s order in its entirety.

Everyone knows, Cannon is incompetent.

Translation, she's not giving you the blood you want to see fast enough. Admit it, anything short of absolute conviction and extreme punishment will have you screaming that somebody's incompetent. It's why they wouldn't let you anywhere near the jury pool.

 

[Smokin' OP]

No. the full of shit none is you.
Stop being an assuole troll.

Again: he has never claimed that he ever declassified anything by just thinking it.

Trump sure insinuated, he did.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it​

Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2022/09/21 › trump...
Sep 21, 2022 — The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified.

“There doesn’t have to be a process, as I understand it,” Trump said. “You’re the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it’s declassified, even by thinking about it.”

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
“In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified,” Trump said.

SO.............WHO did he tell?
Himself?

And some legal commentators pretending otherwise doesn’t address the topic since this conversation has been had, already, repeatedly. You go ahead and believe whatever you wish. Your ignorance remains unpersuasive.

ABA Fact Check: Extent of Presidential Legal Authority to Declassify Materials Is Still Unclear

Most national security legal experts dismissed the former president’s suggestion that while in office he could declassify documents simply by thinking about it. But in theory, legal guidelines support his contention that a president has broad authority to formally declassify most documents that...

lawandcrime.com

Your ignorance remains unpersuasive.


A formal procedure is required so governmental agencies know with certainty what has been declassified and decisions memorialized. A federal appeals court in a 2020 Freedom of Information Act case, New York Times v. CIA, underscored that point: “Declassification cannot occur unless designated officials follow specified procedures,” the court said.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Translation, she's not giving you the blood you want to see fast enough. Admit it, anything short of absolute conviction and extreme punishment will have you screaming that somebody's incompetent.

Cannon is delaying the trial.
Just like Trump wants.

Cannon has confounded legal experts with the pace of her decision making and long bouts of silence about crucial trial questions. Though she held a hearing March 1 on how much to postpone the original May 20 trial date, she waited more than two months before issuing any order on that issue — and still did not set a new date.

It's why they wouldn't let you anywhere near the jury pool.

Jury pool?
If that was left to Cannon, she will announce the jury's been seated.
One day after Trump's funeral.

 

[BackAgain]

Trump sure insinuated, he did.

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it​

View attachment 945642
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2022/09/21 › trump...
Sep 21, 2022 — The former president insisted in an interview with Sean Hannity that the documents at issue in the Mar-a-Lago probe were all declassified.

“There doesn’t have to be a process, as I understand it,” Trump said. “You’re the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying it’s declassified, even by thinking about it.”

Pressed further, Trump insisted he had declassified the documents in question when he left the White House, again without pointing to proof of such.
“In other words, when I left the White House, they were declassified,” Trump said.

SO.............WHO did he tell?
Himself?



Your ignorance remains unpersuasive.


A formal procedure is required so governmental agencies know with certainty what has been declassified and decisions memorialized. A federal appeals court in a 2020 Freedom of Information Act case, New York Times v. CIA, underscored that point: “Declassification cannot occur unless designated officials follow specified procedures,” the court said.

Just your misinterpretation.

 

[Faun]

Then she perjured herself and should be charged. That gold-digging whore once signed an affidavit stating she never had sex with Trump.

Not true. There is no such affidavit.