Trudeau of Canada: Seeks life sentencing for speech crimes.

[iamwhatiseem]

FFS read your own link.

He is trolling you and everyone else here.
He has no intention of doing anything but keep you guys bantering back and forth and trash the thread

 

[mudwhistle]

You are left with lashing out because you don't like what I respond with. Very little of what Biden has done have I supported.

But since you can't actually address my arguments you have to mindlessly lash out.

You say very little......but you seem to support every single aspect of it with your posts.
I don't support anything he does because what he's doing is absolute insanity, and then when I do some schmuck like you turns around and defends Biden by attacking Trump. You're trying to use moral-relativism to make excuses for the insanity of the Biden Adm.
Don't claim you never do that, because I see it all of the time.

 

[TNHarley]

I did.

Apparently not. It clearly states they banned handguns from sale and transfer.

 

[pknopp]

You say very little......but you seem to support every single aspect of it with your posts.

And yet I don't but continue lashing out. I've condemned his spending, his war positions, his inability to think because of his age.

I don't support anything he does because what he's doing is absolute insanity, and then when I do some schmuck like you turns around and defends Biden by attacking Trump.

I get it is hard for the majority to understand but it is possible for some of to not support either party. It seems to be a position many can't comprehend but that's your problem, not mine.

You're trying to use moral-relativism to make excuses for the insanity of the Biden Adm.
Don't claim you never do that, because I see it all of the time.

No idea what part of the administration I'm excusing. Have examples? No.

 

[pknopp]

Apparently not. It clearly states they banned handguns from sale and transfer.

You have to register and take a class. That's what the link states. To be factual, many in Canada own guns but the ability to own guns is more restrictive than in the U.S.

I'm also sure there are guns changing hands in Canada every single day.

 

[Mac-7]

To protect children from sexual exploitation, Canada must pass the Online Harms Act, says Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government. “I am the parent of two young boys,” said Justice Minister Arif Virani. “I will do whatever I can to ensure their digital world is as safe as the neighborhood we live in. Children are vulnerable online. They need to be protected from online sexual exploitation, hate, and cyberbullying.”

Sounds just like the arguments from the right. Where is the issue?

The internet has drastically changed the world we live in and the challenges of growing up

Previous generations of children - those from before the internet - had limited access to pornography and other forms of liberal insanity

So most children were reasonably safe from adult sexual predators

But now almost every child has a smart phone

Which is an open door for the twisted leftwingers

 

[pknopp]

The internet has drastically changed the world we live in and the challenges of growing up

Previous generations of children - those from before the internet - had limited access to pornography and other forms of liberal insanity

Had to access the book rack in the bathroom to grab dad's Playboy.

So most children were reasonably safe from adult sexual predators

But now almost every child has a smart phone

Which is an open door for the twisted leftwing

Exploitation of children has always been with us. In the past orphanages were nothing but cesspools of child abuse. They gave us people like Albert Fish.

Many people simply don't know history.

 

[eagle1462010]

Ban all handguns from purchases and transfers, now they want to throw people in jail for YEARS for saying "he" instead of "she" to some unstable mental person.
What a fuckin shithole.
And we are right behind them.
Fuck all leftists.

If our country wasnt going to hell too, we would be planning an invasion North to remove a Tyrant.

 

[Mac-7]

Had to access the book rack in the bathroom to grab dad's Playboy.

Its a fact that the sexual revolution did not begin with the Baby Boomers, but rather with the WWII generation who returned to civilian life with a drinking problem and much more liberal ideas about sex

 

[pknopp]

Its a fact that the sexual revolution did not begin with the Baby Boomers, but rather with the WWII generation who returned to civilian life with a drinking problem and much more liberal ideas about sex

War does cause a lot of problems but for some reason with all the evidence we have, we just can't seem to break up with it.

 

[eagle1462010]

He is trolling you and everyone else here.
He has no intention of doing anything but keep you guys bantering back and forth and trash the thread

Ive had that punk on ignore forever. He isnt worthy of a response

 

[pknopp]

Ive had that punk on ignore forever. He isnt worthy of a response

Some people seem to prefer an echo chamber that never questions their beliefs.

 

[Polishprince]

America really needs to consider imposing the Roosevelt Corollary on Canada for these kind of craziness.

International Law gives the nation the right to maintain order in our Hemisphere.

Whatever happened to the Democrat Party's demand for 54-40 or fight?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

The scary part is - I believe that over half of Democrats in Washington would vote to pass a similar law as this. 5 years ago no one here would have thought there would be laws against calling a cross dresser a man... punishable by law.
And now we have laws like that.

 

[mudwhistle]

And yet I don't but continue lashing out. I've condemned his spending, his war positions, his inability to think because of his age.




I get it is hard for the majority to understand but it is possible for some of to not support either party. It seems to be a position many can't comprehend but that's your problem, not mine.




No idea what part of the administration I'm excusing. Have examples? No.

Playing dumb is a common thing with you facilitators. It's written in the imaginary liberal handbook, page 101.

You claim you're the intelligent one and we're the dummies, because you think you're not taking a stance.

It seems like on every issue, you're always supporting the left and end up questioning, even condemning the right.
That's not someone who's impartial.

I can name off the one or two other fuckwads who practice this form of deception, but I choose not to because talking to you is like talking to the wall.

Pick any subject and you'll support leftist ideology because that's the way you think.

 

[pknopp]

Playing dumb is a common thing with you facilitators. It's written in the imaginary liberal handbook, page 101.

You claim you're the intelligent one and we're the dummies, because you think you're not taking a stance.

I never claimed that. I stated a position. Feel free to offer a decent rebuttal and I'll consider it.

Lashing out I won't.

I take a stance on many things. Balancing the budgets, ending our participation in wars, etc.

It seems like on every issue, you're always supporting the left and end up questioning, even condemning the right.
That's not someone who's impartial.

Again, i never said I was impartial.

Who am I supporting when I note I am pro-life. When i support the 2nd? When I support a balanced budget?

I can name off the one or two other fuckwads who practice this form of deception, but I choose not to because talking to you is like talking to the wall.

Pick any subject and you'll support leftist ideology because that's the way you think.

OK.....the 2nd amendment. Show me where I have support the positions of the "left".

 

[mudwhistle]

I never claimed that. I stated a position. Feel free to offer a decent rebuttal and I'll consider it.

Lashing out I won't.

I take a stance on many things. Balancing the budgets, ending our participation in wars, etc.




Again, i never said I was impartial.

Who am I supporting when I note I am pro-life. When i support the 2nd? When I support a balanced budget?




OK.....the 2nd amendment. Show me where I have support the positions of the "left".

I said you want to act like you're not taking a stand.

Learn to read English, shitforbrains.

And trying to bring up one issue you think you didn't show support for doesn't prove anything,

If you support Democrats in any shape or form then automatically you support massive spending, higher taxes, abortion after birth, gun confiscation, arresting MAGA simply for general purposes, open borders, massive migration, and giving schools the right to groom our kids.

Since these issues are part of the Democrat platform, and you stand up for them at every turn, then you're a facilitator.
You're like those folks that lived a mile or two from Auschwitz and didn't even know where that smell was coming from.

 

[Votto]

He can be a real idiot and troll that, if you reply, will take over the thread into meaningless back and forth tail chasing.
For whatever reason, he just likes to argue. And will keep replying back to infinity with question pretending to be ignorant

Sure enough, you were correct.

At the same time, it is fun to destroy them in a debate, which was done here, and leave them for dead.

 

[pknopp]

I said you want to act like you're not taking a stand.

Again, wrong. I'm simply not supporting the failures of either main party. I take a stand on many things as I noted and you ignored.

Learn to read English, shitforbrains.

And trying to bring up one issue you think you didn't show support for doesn't prove anything,

I mentioned more than one.

If you support Democrats in any shape or form then automatically you support massive spending, higher taxes, abortion after birth, gun confiscation, arresting MAGA simply for general purposes, open borders, massive migration, and giving schools the right to groom our kids.

I have I believe for national office voted for a Democrat one time in my life. Awhile back I did vote for Joe Manchin.

Since these issues are part of the Democrat platform, and you stand up for them at every turn, then you're a facilitator.
You're like those folks that lived a mile or two from Auschwitz and didn't even know where that smell was coming from.

Lash out, it's all you have.

 

[mudwhistle]

Again, wrong. I'm simply not supporting the failures of either main party. I take a stand on many things as I noted and you ignored.



I mentioned more than one.




I have I believe for national office voted for a Democrat one time in my life. Awhile back I did vote for Joe Manchin.




Lash out, it's all you have.

No....I have your posts. They're all the proof I need.

And let's focus on your own posts:

I'm simply not supporting the failures of either main party."

This is a refusal to take a stand on an issue or issues.