Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: “We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election” (Through Discovery)

[Thunk]

I'm begging you, put him on the stand. You'll obliterate even the benefit of the doubt for Trump in 15 minutes.

Just like he did on his CNN town hall a couple months ago?

 

[Skylar]

Just like he did on his CNN town hall a couple months ago?

View attachment 810636

Laughing....you get that a TV show and an actual court of law aren't the same thing, right?

That Kaitlan Collin couldn't hold Trump in contempt of court. But Judge Tanya Chutkan absolutely can.

But don't take my word for it. Have Trump scream over the judge and call her a 'nasty woman' and insult her looks.

Fuck around and find out.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

What rigged election?

Remember, its been years. And y'all still have jackshit to back that nonsense.

And every count, recount, hand count, machine count, court ruling, or law enforcement investigation shows the same thing:

A Biden win.

No, idiot! Biden was installed as a Usurper through fraud. True discovery is going to be made in this case.

And every count, recount, hand count, machine count

They recounted the fraudulent ballots is what they did.

 

[Skylar]

No, idiot! Biden was installed as a Usurper through fraud. True discovery is going to be made in this case.

Says you, citing jack shit. Again, its been *years*. And rather than the evidence mounting to back your delusional nonsense, instead its been loss after loss.

Sidney Powell admitting in court document that no reasonable person would ever take her BIg Lie claims as statements of fact.

Trump dismissing his own case against Georgia.

Alan Dershowitz desperately trying to distance himself from the Big Lie, insisting he was only a consultant.

Rudy Gulliani admitting that his claims against the Georgia election workers were lies.

Steve Bannon admitting that Trump's strategy was to claim victory no matter what the election results showed.

Fake electors indicted for forging fraudulent election documents.

Republican officials indicted for illegally tampering with voting machines.

Trump indicted for conspiracy.

And every count, recount, hand count, machine count, official count, audit, forensic audit, law enforcement investigation (state or federal), and court ruling (state or federal) has found the exact same thing:

That the Big Lie was bullshit. And Biden won.

 

[Flash]

After the Civil War the goddamn Union assholes never brought any insurrection charges against any former Confederate leader. It was because they knew that secession was legal and they would have lost in court.

When the Democrat filth realizes these silly ass 1/6 charges against Trump will lead to all the evidence of the stolen election becoming known they will drop the charges.

Of course the only reason for the charges anyhow is take the spotlight off of the Biden's corruption with foreign interest.

Banana republic shit.

 

[Skylar]

After the Civil War the goddamn Union assholes never brought any insurrection charges against any former Confederate leader. It was because they knew that secession was legal and they would have lost in court.

The Supreme Court found that secession was illegal.

Texas v. White | Civil War, Secession, Union

Texas v. White, (1869), U.S. Supreme Court case in which it was held that the United States is “an indestructible union” from which no state can secede. In 1850 the state of Texas received $10,000,000 in federal government bonds in settlement of boundary claims. In 1861 the state seceded from the

www.britannica.com

So much for your meaningless, pseudo-legal nonsense.

 

[Flash]

The Supreme Court found that secession was illegal.

Texas v. White | Civil War, Secession, Union

Texas v. White, (1869), U.S. Supreme Court case in which it was held that the United States is “an indestructible union” from which no state can secede. In 1850 the state of Texas received $10,000,000 in federal government bonds in settlement of boundary claims. In 1861 the state seceded from the

www.britannica.com

So much for your meaningless, pseudo-legal nonsense.

That White v Texas decision was a sham. It was long after the Civil War.

First of all the case didn't have damn thing to do with secession. It was an invented decision. The facts of secession were never litigated. It was a contrived decision.

Second of all that asshole Justice that made the decision was a former cabinet member of the Lincoln administration. The very sonofabitches that started the war, invaded the South and killed Americans.

One of the worst decisions ever made by the Court.

Jefferson Davis was never taken to court because the fucking Union government knew that if the issue was ever really litigated then they would lose.

I doubt this Administration of Filth would want to see the real facts of the 2020 stolen election brought to light.

It is just a cover up for to take the spot light off of all the facts about the Biden family corruption that is being exposed now.

 

[Skylar]

That White v Texas decision was a sham. It was long after the Civil War.

First of all the case didn't have damn thing to do with secession. It was an invented decision. The facts of secession were never litigated. It was a contrived decision.

Second of all that asshole Justice that made the decision was a former cabinet member of the Lincoln administration. The very sonofabitches that started the war, invaded the South and killed Americans.

One of the worst decision ever made by the Court.

Jefferson Davis was never taken to court because the fucking Union government knew that if the issue was ever really litigated then they would lose.

I doubt this Administration of Filth would want to see the real facts of the 2020 stolen election brought to light.

It is just a cover up for to take the spot light off of all the facts about the Biden family corruption that is being exposed now.

Laughing.....so your 'legal theory' requires that we ignore the Supreme Court explicitly contradicting you and obliterating your entire, imaginary rant.

Good luck with that.

 

[two_iron]

The record speaks for itself.... Trump always wins. 7 years later he's STILL playing golf on world class resorts and banging a super model every night. Meanwhile his counterpart has been caught taking millions in bribes, can't stay on its feet and molests 9-year olds.

And the shit-eating bidophiles are still having nightmares about a 30 foot orange nutsack smothering them in their sleep.

It is what it is.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Cool. I mean its not a legal defense, but cool I guess.

 

[Thunk]

Cool. I mean its not a legal defense, but cool I guess.

It IS a legal defense!

As the filth tries to PROVE that Trump BELIEVED he lost the election fair and square...

Trump will PROVE the election was stolen.

How they intend to PROVE that anybody BELIEVED anything is beyond me! Did they take a picture of his brain at the time?

 

[Thunk]

And the shit-eating bidophiles are still having nightmares about a 30 foot orange nutsack smothering them in their sleep.

I'm stealing that line from you!

 

[Zincwarrior]

It IS a legal defense!

No. You are ignorant or a moron. He is being charged with attempting overturn the election. He has to defend against that.

 

[Thunk]

No. You are ignorant or a moron

As much as I LOVE to argue with fools on the internet all day...I must decline & just say...do some homework!

They have to PROVE in court what Trump was thunking.

Rotsa ruck!

 

[Zincwarrior]

As much as I LOVE to argue with fools on the internet all day...I must decline & just say...do some homework!

They have to PROVE in court what Trump was thunking.

Rotsa ruck!

No. Just actions.

 

[Failzero]

This will go Sideways for the DOJ .

 

[Zincwarrior]

This will go Sideways for the DOJ .

Well if he keeps it up he will be in a jail cell with revoked bail.

 

[Failzero]

Well if he keeps it up he will be in a jail cell with revoked bail.

Or a Change of Venue and dismissal of Charges .

 

[Leo123]

Trump's had opportunities for discovery before. And yet his record of failure in court is perfect. Every single big lie case, without exception, was lost by Trump.

But this time its different, huh? Good luck with that.

State a specific case.

 

[Leo123]

Actually, most of the cases got dismissed on procedural grounds prior to any hearings, etc.; but this time, the issues raised may require a full examination.

Yes 'lack of standing' which is a very low bar. The court does not even have to find lack of merit. The MSM and the lying 'fact check' sites like Politifact do not make that distinction they just claim the cases were dismissed due to 'lack of merit' which is an outright lie. The TDSer fall for it like a bunch of suckerfishes.