Trump calls for new 2020 election or declare he won

[otto105]

He has outsmarted people for a long time. I don't see his streak ending.

2020

 

[Sixties Fan]

They didn't want their homes burnt down by BLM.

Sorry, but is utter nonsense.

They follow the Constitution and the Rule of Law and it is called fear? Give them a break. They chose to follow the law, that is all.


The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a handful of cases related to the 2020 election, including disputes from Pennsylvania that had deeply divided the justices just before the election.

The cases the justices rejected involved election challenges filed by former President Donald Trump and his allies in five states President Joe Biden won: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Other than two Pennsylvania disputes, the justices’ decision not to hear the cases was unsurprising but ends months of legal wrangling. The court had previously taken no action in those cases and in January had turned away pleas that the cases be fast-tracked, again suggesting the justices were not interested in hearing them.

Supreme Court rejects Trump election challenge cases

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a handful of cases related to the 2020 election, including disputes from Pennsylvania that had deeply divided the justices just before the election.

apnews.com

[ Were three of the Republican SC judges in fear? Or following the Constitution and Rule of Law? ]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday brought a formal end to eight lingering disputes pursued by former President Donald Trump and his allies related to the Nov. 3 presidential election including a Republican challenge to the extension of Pennsylvania’s deadline to receive mail-in ballots.

The justices turned away appeals by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania and Republican members of the state legislature of a ruling by Pennsylvania’s top court ordering officials to count mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received up to three days later.

Three of the nine-member court’s six conservative justices - Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch - dissented from the decision not to hear the Pennsylvania case.

U.S. Supreme Court formally pulls the plug on election-related cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday brought a formal end to eight lingering disputes pursued by former President Donald Trump and his allies related to the Nov. 3 presidential election including a Republican challenge to the extension of Pennsylvania's deadline to receive mail-in ballots.

www.reuters.com

 

[Indeependent]

Sorry, but is utter nonsense.

They follow the Constitution and the Rule of Law and it is called fear? Give them a break. They chose to follow the law, that is all.


The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a handful of cases related to the 2020 election, including disputes from Pennsylvania that had deeply divided the justices just before the election.

The cases the justices rejected involved election challenges filed by former President Donald Trump and his allies in five states President Joe Biden won: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Other than two Pennsylvania disputes, the justices’ decision not to hear the cases was unsurprising but ends months of legal wrangling. The court had previously taken no action in those cases and in January had turned away pleas that the cases be fast-tracked, again suggesting the justices were not interested in hearing them.

Supreme Court rejects Trump election challenge cases

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a handful of cases related to the 2020 election, including disputes from Pennsylvania that had deeply divided the justices just before the election.

apnews.com

[ Were three of the Republican SC judges in fear? Or following the Constitution and Rule of Law? ]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday brought a formal end to eight lingering disputes pursued by former President Donald Trump and his allies related to the Nov. 3 presidential election including a Republican challenge to the extension of Pennsylvania’s deadline to receive mail-in ballots.

The justices turned away appeals by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania and Republican members of the state legislature of a ruling by Pennsylvania’s top court ordering officials to count mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received up to three days later.

Three of the nine-member court’s six conservative justices - Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch - dissented from the decision not to hear the Pennsylvania case.

U.S. Supreme Court formally pulls the plug on election-related cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday brought a formal end to eight lingering disputes pursued by former President Donald Trump and his allies related to the Nov. 3 presidential election including a Republican challenge to the extension of Pennsylvania's deadline to receive mail-in ballots.

www.reuters.com

Partisan shit without looking at the evidence.
I was actually reading the stories day by day.
When a court hears a case for 5 minutes and tells you to fuck off, you have a problem with the system.

 

[Indeependent]

Those were Republican judges. They would have looked at any of it if it had any merit.

Stop wasting the court time with nonsense, with lack of evidence.

Which is why a 6 Republican majority SC would have non of it.

Rs were afraid of BLM.

 

[otto105]

Partisan shit without looking at the evidence.
I was actually reading the stories day by day.
When a court hears a case for 5 minutes and tells you to fuck off, you have a problem with the system.

Courts don’t phish.

You bring the evidence to court. You don’t ask a court to create it.

 

[otto105]

Rs were afraid of BLM.

Awwwww, you poor bois.


Do shadows scare you too? Since their dark and spooky….


Hilarious

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And you cannot figure out why?

I posted the article. There are others which explain why any of those judges would not see the case, or how lousy the lawyers were at presenting any facts, if any. And even the Supreme Court went.....sorry, not here.

Courts don't like to get caught up in election battles. The only reason they did so in the Gore/Bush race is because Al's buddies in the Florida court were practicing judicial legislation.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes you go with that. Try it on a judge. Tell how fast you get arrested.

Arrested for what?

 

[otto105]

Courts don't like to get caught up in election battles. The only reason they did so in the Gore/Bush race is because Al's buddies in the Florida court were practicing judicial legislation.

Not

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Well, no. If each ot the things you mentioned wasn't preceded by right wing law breaking, you might have a point, but holding law breakers accountable is just good government. You advocate targeting those that did nothing more than our laws require.

The laws don't require anything I listed. Just like when the real 1/6 commission starts after January of next year. Not required, but people need to know the truth.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Good read, read or not, it is very detailed as to what happened with the 2020 election and the courts:

Why Trump’s attempt to steal the election was too much even for Republican judges

Judges are highly political, but they aren’t exactly like politicians.

www.vox.com

 

[otto105]

The laws don't require anything I listed. Just like when the real 1/6 commission starts after January of next year. Not required, but people need to know the truth.

Yeah, we do. It was televised.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The laws don't require anything I listed. Just like when the real 1/6 commission starts after January of next year. Not required, but people need to know the truth.

Do not get ahead of yourself. You may end up disappointed if Republicans end up voting more for the Democrats than the Republican candidates, themselves.

There will be on Real 1/6 commission to undo a legal election result.

 

[otto105]

Do not get ahead of yourself. You may end up disappointed if Republicans end up voting more for the Democrats than the Republican candidates, themselves.

There will be on Real 1/6 commission to undo a legal election result.

Sure, a real J6 commission. They will kill it and run away from it to the arms of margorie green and Jewish Space Lasers.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It was asking for a corrupt political favor in the strong arm attempt using tax payer funded, paid for and approve military aid. In that same recorded story told by Biden, the Ukrainians questioned his authority, and he told them to call President Obama to see who had what authority. The Englishman who did the work on the dossier did not know who the client was. That information was never used in the campaign like the stolen DNC material was.

Trump never threatened aid like Dementia did when he was VP. He flat out said it. The only thing he didn't come clean on is that he was protecting his criminal drug addict son.

HTF did Steele not know who was paying him? They wanted dirt on Trump just before the election. Who else would be paying for that information?

 

[otto105]

Trump never threatened aid like Dementia did when he was VP. He flat out said it. The only thing he didn't come clean on is that he was protecting his criminal drug addict son.

HTF did Steele not know who was paying him? They wanted dirt on Trump just before the election. Who else would be paying for that information?

Ray, check the facts not the QOP talking points you parrot.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Trump never threatened aid like Dementia did when he was VP. He flat out said it. The only thing he didn't come clean on is that he was protecting his criminal drug addict son.

HTF did Steele not know who was paying him? They wanted dirt on Trump just before the election. Who else would be paying for that information?

Endless conspiracy theories. You choose your sources well.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

“The fact is that the President of the United States, in breach of his constitutional responsibilities, has asked a foreign government to help him in his political campaign at the expense of our national security, as well as undermining the integrity of our elections,” Pelosi said after the transcript was released Wednesday. “That cannot stand. He will be held accountable. No one is above the law.”
--
The July 25 call, which took place one day after former special counsel Robert Mueller testified before Congress about Russian interference in US elections, was also part of a whistleblower complaint submitted to the Intelligence Community Inspector General, a source familiar with the situation previously told CNN, a revelation that has only raised more questions in the ongoing controversy.

During the call, Trump suggested four times that Barr will call Zelensky and repeatedly mentions Giuliani, the Trump ally and former New York City mayor.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/25/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript

Below is also against Election Laws:




During an hourlong phone call, President Trump pressured Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to overturn the 2020 election results. Trump said, “I just want to find 11,780 votes.”»

He didn't say manufacture votes, he said find the votes, as in something wasn't counted properly. As for Dementia, during the phone call with Zelenkyy he was running for the Communist party nomination. He wasn't even Trump's rival yet, so the entire thing was a complete lie like always with the left.

 

[mamooth]

Serious question:

Why has this man _not_ been visited by nice young men in white coats wielding oversized butterfly nets?

The fired agent

The fired agent who was just escorted out of the FBI headquarters is the person who got the FBI to do a Raid on a home, Mar-a-Lago, that has “stirred” the ...

thedeskofdonaldtrump.com

---
“The fired agent who was just escorted out of the FBI headquarters is the person who got the FBI to do a Raid on a home, Mar-a-Lago, that has “stirred” the World and created anger and hostility toward the FBI and DOJ the likes of which have perhaps never been seen in our Country before. The “Special Agent” In Charge of the unprecedented and unnecessary Raid and Break In of Mar-a-Lago, who concealed the partisan nature of evidence to secure the FBI’s approval to open an investigation into the 45th President in the first place, was also involved in the hiding and suppressing from the Public and the Media, the “Laptop from Hell,” the 2020 Presidential Election Scam, and so much more!”
---

 

[Sixties Fan]

He didn't say manufacture votes, he said find the votes, as in something wasn't counted properly. As for Dementia, during the phone call with Zelenkyy he was running for the Communist party nomination. He wasn't even Trump's rival yet, so the entire thing was a complete lie like always with the left.

Trump knew that the only candidate he had to fear could beat him was Joe Biden. Which is why he asked for Zelensky to just say that he had something on Biden.

He got caught. That is what happens to cheaters.