- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,355
- 38,046
- 2,290
Big debate on the Sunday morning talk shows, Trump wants to charge US allies the actual cost plus 50% for US forces stationed in their countries.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...91378986dbb_story.html?utm_term=.6de5012523a8
I can see both sides of this debate:
1. Why should US taxpayers borrow money to protect other countries, such as the EU from Russia, South Korea from NK, Japan from China, ME countries from Iran, etc.? Italy, WTF?? Lets say the cost of the major bases and not the small "lily pads" needed for local access all over.
2. The generals argue that the US bases secure our allies loyalty, and in today's world we need all the allies we can get. We are spending $24b a year to keep US troops in the EU. Trump wants $36b a year to keep them there, otherwise we bring most of them home because we can keep borrowing, the US is tapped out.
Lets take a poll...
![]()
It is kind of cute how you think we are there to protect them and not project our own power across the globe.
I want to see Trump pull all the troops out of Japan after they tell him to pound sand...he does not have the balls for such an action.
So do you really want to speak Russian?
you are a fucking moron. What the hell is Russia going to do?
so let us guess you flunked out of History 101 you stupid fucking ignorant clown.
Nope, I actually know my history, and I even have the cool "Cold War Victory Medal" for serving my country during the Cold war...do you have one of those...oh wait you never had the balls to serve your country.
There was never a time when Russia was going to take us over and make us all speak Russian.
this is what happens when you drop out of school after the 3rd grade...you end as stupid as you are.