Trump cuts New Hampshire rally short to receive remains of 2 soldiers killed in Afghanistan

[Flash]

Trump always does the right thing. Well almost always, banning bump stock was the wrong thing.

 

[mudwhistle]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

Trump had to fire his Secretary of Defense over his decision to pull out the troops in Syria.

So do us a favor and STFU.

You are another Trump sheep.....whatever he does is gospel. Jesus himself won't stand a chance against the orange in your opinion i'm sure.

No.....I just know nobody else can be trusted. That's a sad state of affairs....but that's what the situation is in Washington.

 

[Jitss617]

Incredible leader

 

[toobfreak]

I forget, just what are we still doing in Afghanistan?

Stopping ISIS from reforming their Leftist Caliphate.

But ISIS is destroyed. Doesn't anyone else want ISIS stopped? You mean Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Kurdistan, Iran, Kuewait, UAE, Germany, France, England, Canada, etc., etc., etc., don't want to stop ISIS and it is all on OUR shoulders? It's up to US to fight EVERY war? Just how long does it take to defeat a bunch of towel-heads with 50 year old second-hand gear on a shoestring budget anyway?

10 years?

50 years?

It is for good and that is the way it is. Please use the rise of isis as the justification. You dismiss the notion of the logistical reality in an unstable world in unstable regions.

Sorry, but that is reality.

What lesson do you learn from the rise of isis? Don't think that would happen again?

What do I learn? I learn that even decades and decades of American presence at a cost of trillions of dollars doesn't rid these countries of loons or make nations want to stand on their own two feet or fight their own battles much less other countries contribute when they see us doing all the heavy lifting. We must be doing too good of a job as they just don't see the need. I also see that if we left and really had the need, we could be back there if necessary in a couple of weeks.

The real answer to the ME isn't tanks or bombs, it is education, modernization and opportunity. And that is ultimately up to THEM.

 

[Theowl32]

I forget, just what are we still doing in Afghanistan?

Stopping ISIS from reforming their Leftist Caliphate.

But ISIS is destroyed. Doesn't anyone else want ISIS stopped? You mean Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Kurdistan, Iran, Kuewait, UAE, Germany, France, England, Canada, etc., etc., etc., don't want to stop ISIS and it is all on OUR shoulders? It's up to US to fight EVERY war? Just how long does it take to defeat a bunch of towel-heads with 50 year old second-hand gear on a shoestring budget anyway?

10 years?

50 years?

It is for good and that is the way it is. Please use the rise of isis as the justification. You dismiss the notion of the logistical reality in an unstable world in unstable regions.

Sorry, but that is reality.

What lesson do you learn from the rise of isis? Don't think that would happen again?

What do I learn? I learn that even decades and decades of American presence at a cost of trillions of dollars doesn't rid these countries of loons or make nations want to stand on their own two feet or fight their own battles much less other countries contribute when they see us doing all the heavy lifting. We must be doing too good of a job as they just don't see the need. I also see that if we left and really had the need, we could be back there if necessary in a couple of weeks.

The real answer to the ME isn't tanks or bombs, it is education, modernization and opportunity. And that is ultimately up to THEM.

Not that simple. Sorry. You don't get it.

 

[toobfreak]

I forget, just what are we still doing in Afghanistan?

Stopping ISIS from reforming their Leftist Caliphate.

But ISIS is destroyed. Doesn't anyone else want ISIS stopped? You mean Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Kurdistan, Iran, Kuewait, UAE, Germany, France, England, Canada, etc., etc., etc., don't want to stop ISIS and it is all on OUR shoulders? It's up to US to fight EVERY war? Just how long does it take to defeat a bunch of towel-heads with 50 year old second-hand gear on a shoestring budget anyway?

10 years?

50 years?

It is for good and that is the way it is. Please use the rise of isis as the justification. You dismiss the notion of the logistical reality in an unstable world in unstable regions.

Sorry, but that is reality.

What lesson do you learn from the rise of isis? Don't think that would happen again?

What do I learn? I learn that even decades and decades of American presence at a cost of trillions of dollars doesn't rid these countries of loons or make nations want to stand on their own two feet or fight their own battles much less other countries contribute when they see us doing all the heavy lifting. We must be doing too good of a job as they just don't see the need. I also see that if we left and really had the need, we could be back there if necessary in a couple of weeks.

The real answer to the ME isn't tanks or bombs, it is education, modernization and opportunity. And that is ultimately up to THEM.

Not that simple. Sorry. You don't get it.

Oh I think I do. If there was more to the story that YOU got, you'd have something COGENT to say besides "not that simple."

 

[jknowgood]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

So all of the soldiers blood in Iraq when Obama lied about getting the soldiers out in his first year?

 

[jknowgood]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

I forget, just what are we still doing in Afghanistan?

The logistical reality of our world. We are still in Germany and Japan.

Don't think for one moment those countries don't want us there. They all appreciate our money and umbrella protection. Regardless of what their governments may or may not say to their citizens.

This country subjugates no one. However, we need places for rapid response WHEN RAPID RESPONSE IS NEEDED.

It is an unstable world in unstable regions. If we want a worse problem than the one before then by all means, lets not have any bases anywhere except here.

It is hard to explain it to people who have no clue about logistics. Just remember this. Amateurs are always saying and yelling about what should be done. The professionals are always always always studying logistics.

That is why we are still there and will essentially always be there. Btw, that is why these politicians like their house marxist negro who promise shit while campaigning and then when they have to meet with Joint Chief of Staff and see the classified intel, well there it is. Still in Afghanistan.

We public citizens are pretty clueless. Oh, arrogant know it alls, but utterly clueless.

So from what you telling me and after all trump doesn't know better than the generals and the logistical teams at the Pentagon? because he ran on the promise of putting troops out. So either he was make a bullshit promise or he basically has no clue about how things work. Or best yet how would you spin this?

So what do you say about Obama's promise about ending the Iraq war in his first year. Oh and closing gitmo asap? So you calling him a liar?

 

[pknopp]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

Bush, Cheney, Obama, Hillary, Graham, McCain, Trump and a long list of others deserve to rot in hell for what they have done.

 

[jknowgood]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

I forget, just what are we still doing in Afghanistan?

Gee, a sign of backbone. We’re there because your blob would look weak if we pulled out.

Don't you have some house cleaning to get to? Men are trying to talk. Don't have time for female bullshit.

i'm not a female dumbass. women aren't for cleaning houses only. Remember Hillary outvoted the orange and Nancy impeached him lol

How did that work out for you? Lol

 

[pknopp]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

I forget, just what are we still doing in Afghanistan?

The logistical reality of our world. We are still in Germany and Japan.

Don't think for one moment those countries don't want us there. They all appreciate our money and umbrella protection. Regardless of what their governments may or may not say to their citizens.

This country subjugates no one. However, we need places for rapid response WHEN RAPID RESPONSE IS NEEDED.

It is an unstable world in unstable regions. If we want a worse problem than the one before then by all means, lets not have any bases anywhere except here.

It is hard to explain it to people who have no clue about logistics. Just remember this. Amateurs are always saying and yelling about what should be done. The professionals are always always always studying logistics.

That is why we are still there and will essentially always be there. Btw, that is why these politicians like their house marxist negro who promise shit while campaigning and then when they have to meet with Joint Chief of Staff and see the classified intel, well there it is. Still in Afghanistan.

We public citizens are pretty clueless. Oh, arrogant know it alls, but utterly clueless.

So from what you telling me and after all trump doesn't know better than the generals and the logistical teams at the Pentagon? because he ran on the promise of putting troops out. So either he was make a bullshit promise or he basically has no clue about how things work. Or best yet how would you spin this?

So what do you say about Obama's promise about ending the Iraq war in his first year. Oh and closing gitmo asap? So you calling him a liar?

Absolutely. See above.

 

[pknopp]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

Trump had to fire his Secretary of Defense over his decision to pull out the troops in Syria.

So do us a favor and STFU.

We didn't pull the troops out of Syria.

 

[Theowl32]

Stopping ISIS from reforming their Leftist Caliphate.

But ISIS is destroyed. Doesn't anyone else want ISIS stopped? You mean Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Kurdistan, Iran, Kuewait, UAE, Germany, France, England, Canada, etc., etc., etc., don't want to stop ISIS and it is all on OUR shoulders? It's up to US to fight EVERY war? Just how long does it take to defeat a bunch of towel-heads with 50 year old second-hand gear on a shoestring budget anyway?

10 years?

50 years?

It is for good and that is the way it is. Please use the rise of isis as the justification. You dismiss the notion of the logistical reality in an unstable world in unstable regions.

Sorry, but that is reality.

What lesson do you learn from the rise of isis? Don't think that would happen again?

What do I learn? I learn that even decades and decades of American presence at a cost of trillions of dollars doesn't rid these countries of loons or make nations want to stand on their own two feet or fight their own battles much less other countries contribute when they see us doing all the heavy lifting. We must be doing too good of a job as they just don't see the need. I also see that if we left and really had the need, we could be back there if necessary in a couple of weeks.

The real answer to the ME isn't tanks or bombs, it is education, modernization and opportunity. And that is ultimately up to THEM.

Not that simple. Sorry. You don't get it.

Oh I think I do. If there was more to the story that YOU got, you'd have something COGENT to say besides "not that simple."

I clearly stated the aspect you don't get. Logistics covers a very wide spectrum. Rapid response is the most basic concept in regards to logistical issues. It is not just something to ignore and pretend it is not a major factor. The entire world, not just America, have interests in that region.

An unstable ME directly effects us all. That is only one of many unstable regions in the world.

Here is what happens if we just leave if we just abandon the region.

Warlord types will move in and immediately take over.

They will fortify their areas heavily and then they will wreak havoc.

The world will demand a response and the pressure will be too immense to ignore and considering terror attacks would increase and Americans will die, our response will be imperative.

Now, we need to ship back over there. All of our hardware is now gone and there are no bases to launch counter strikes anywhere.

That WILL happen. Now what? This country has tried to get out of the worlds affairs since before the Embargo Act passed President Jefferson and it was a disaster. Every time we attempt to abandon allies or dismiss our interests it turns into a worse problem than it was in the first place.

If I repeated myself about the logistical realities, you would ignore it again as though there is nothing to it and you would just repeat the simplistic notion of just abandoning the region.

 

[jc456]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

I forget, just what are we still doing in Afghanistan?

Gee, a sign of backbone. We’re there because your blob would look weak if we pulled out.

huh? you think he put them there?

 

[Paulie]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

I forget, just what are we still doing in Afghanistan?

My guess is making sure we clean up what the deep state did to it and make sure that when we leave it we leave it secured. I don’t want to be in these wars anymore than anyone else does but the old guard went into them and fucked them all up and the new guard has a bare minimum responsibility to fix the mess. The deep state was never fixing any of the mess they caused they were facilitating an endless mess so that we could stay there forever.

 

[pknopp]

But ISIS is destroyed. Doesn't anyone else want ISIS stopped? You mean Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Kurdistan, Iran, Kuewait, UAE, Germany, France, England, Canada, etc., etc., etc., don't want to stop ISIS and it is all on OUR shoulders? It's up to US to fight EVERY war? Just how long does it take to defeat a bunch of towel-heads with 50 year old second-hand gear on a shoestring budget anyway?

10 years?

50 years?

It is for good and that is the way it is. Please use the rise of isis as the justification. You dismiss the notion of the logistical reality in an unstable world in unstable regions.

Sorry, but that is reality.

What lesson do you learn from the rise of isis? Don't think that would happen again?

What do I learn? I learn that even decades and decades of American presence at a cost of trillions of dollars doesn't rid these countries of loons or make nations want to stand on their own two feet or fight their own battles much less other countries contribute when they see us doing all the heavy lifting. We must be doing too good of a job as they just don't see the need. I also see that if we left and really had the need, we could be back there if necessary in a couple of weeks.

The real answer to the ME isn't tanks or bombs, it is education, modernization and opportunity. And that is ultimately up to THEM.

Not that simple. Sorry. You don't get it.

Oh I think I do. If there was more to the story that YOU got, you'd have something COGENT to say besides "not that simple."

I clearly stated the aspect you don't get. Logistics covers a very wide spectrum. Rapid response is the most basic concept in regards to logistical issues. It is not just something to ignore and pretend it is not a major factor. The entire world, not just America, have interests in that region.

An unstable ME directly effects us all. That is only one of many unstable regions in the world.

Here is what happens if we just leave if we just abandon the region.

Warlord types will move in and immediately take over.

They will fortify their areas heavily and then they will wreak havoc.

The world will demand a response and the pressure will be too immense to ignore and considering terror attacks would increase and Americans will die, our response will be imperative.

Now, we need to ship back over there. All of our hardware is now gone and there are no bases to launch counter strikes anywhere.

That WILL happen. Now what? This country has tried to get out of the worlds affairs since before the Embargo Act passed President Jefferson and it was a disaster. Every time we attempt to abandon allies or dismiss our interests it turns into a worse problem than it was in the first place.

If I repeated myself about the logistical realities, you would ignore it again as though there is nothing to it and you would just repeat the simplistic notion of just abandoning the region.

Iraq had a lot of problems BUT they are far more unstable today than when we attacked. Same for Afghanistan. Same for Libya.

We made no place more stable by attacking and that's because it is not why we attack.

 

[jc456]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

Trump had to fire his Secretary of Defense over his decision to pull out the troops in Syria.

So do us a favor and STFU.

We didn't pull the troops out of Syria.

right? the demofks and RINO's had a fking kinipshin fit when he did start pulling out. too fking sad. Syria we were told was our ally. huh?

 

[jc456]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

Trump had to fire his Secretary of Defense over his decision to pull out the troops in Syria.

So do us a favor and STFU.

Stupid liberal women like candycorn yelled about Trump abandoning the Kurds.

They are utter wastes of time. Btw, I am one of those that agree with much of the military.

ISIS, is the proof that simply pulling out leads to a far greater disaster.

People can deny or pretend a monster won't grow if we just abandoned the region, but that is NOT REALITY.

A dainty left wing female can giggle all they want as they praised their marxist homosexual negro who also didn't bring troops home that he promised.

Why do we suppose that is? What can we imagine is discussed behind the closed doors in regards to classified intel. Is it all about "oil?"

Trump can't win if he pulls the troops out or leaves them there. It's called a paradox created by morons.

Trump could cure cancer and they'd piss on him. This is the evidence one needs to know it after the Syria pullout.

 

[pknopp]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

Trump had to fire his Secretary of Defense over his decision to pull out the troops in Syria.

So do us a favor and STFU.

We didn't pull the troops out of Syria.

right? the demofks and RINO's had a fking kinipshin fit when he did start pulling out. too fking sad. Syria we were told was our ally. huh?

Yes they complained but in the end it's Trump's call. He had no balls.

 

[jc456]

He had the ability to pull the troops out safe like he promised but he didnt. That's blood on his hands from me.

Trump had to fire his Secretary of Defense over his decision to pull out the troops in Syria.

So do us a favor and STFU.

We didn't pull the troops out of Syria.

right? the demofks and RINO's had a fking kinipshin fit when he did start pulling out. too fking sad. Syria we were told was our ally. huh?

Yes they complained but in the end it's Trump's call. He had no balls.

He pulled the troops out of Syria. what do you mean he didn't have the balls? dude you continue to have poop in your head.

U.S. troops leaving Syria for Iraq as Kurds look to withdraw amid cease-fire