Trump deregulates to increase his base!

[RealDave]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

 

[mudwhistle]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

 

[Auld Phart]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

That explains Detroit, Los Angeles, and multiple other democrat run cities.

 

[Cellblock2429]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

/——/ The air must have been polluted as hell when Obozo was elected. It explains his re-election too.

 

[Erinwltr]

Politics aside. For anyone interested, there is this really cool link buried in your OP about a deep sea coral reef off of South Carolinas coast.

Deep-sea coral reef discovered near Charleston, South Carolina - CNN

 

[Erinwltr]

and you answer to sugar tit .....says a lot about you ...now doesnt it?

Catch and release. Too funny!

 

[JLW]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

 

[WillowTree]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

That explains Detroit, Los Angeles, and multiple other democrat run cities.

That explains realDave.

 

[Cellblock2429]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

/——-/ Here’s an analogy since you can’t seem to grasp our point about over regulation. President Smith is concerned about traffic saftey and reduces the national speed limit from 100 mph to 5 mph. You like President Smith, voted for him and support his safety concerns. Do you drive 5 mph on the Interstate without complaint or do you say gee, maybe over regulation isn’t so good. Let’s ramp it up to 60 mph. Get it now????

 

[JLW]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

/——-/ Here’s an analogy since you can’t seem to grasp our point about over regulation. President Smith is concerned about traffic saftey and reduces the national speed limit from 100 mph to 5 mph. You like President Smith, voted for him and support his safety concerns. Do you drive 5 mph on the Interstate without complaint or do you say gee, maybe over regulation isn’t so good. Let’s ramp it up to 60 mph. Get it now????

Here is where you are wrong. You do not want speed limits. Your own analogy shows a speed limit of 100 when it is 70. You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters. Same with your disdain for environmental laws. Repercussions and injuries mean nothing so long as you can profit from no limits. Get it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

/——-/ Here’s an analogy since you can’t seem to grasp our point about over regulation. President Smith is concerned about traffic saftey and reduces the national speed limit from 100 mph to 5 mph. You like President Smith, voted for him and support his safety concerns. Do you drive 5 mph on the Interstate without complaint or do you say gee, maybe over regulation isn’t so good. Let’s ramp it up to 60 mph. Get it now????

Here is where you are wrong. You do not want speed limits. Your own analogy shows a speed limit of 100 when it is 70. You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters. Same with your disdain for environmental laws. Repercussions and injuries mean nothing so long as you can profit from no limits. Get it?

You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters.

Were you for or against Obama's idea to raise CAFE standards to 54 MPG?

 

[mudwhistle]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

/——-/ Here’s an analogy since you can’t seem to grasp our point about over regulation. President Smith is concerned about traffic saftey and reduces the national speed limit from 100 mph to 5 mph. You like President Smith, voted for him and support his safety concerns. Do you drive 5 mph on the Interstate without complaint or do you say gee, maybe over regulation isn’t so good. Let’s ramp it up to 60 mph. Get it now????

Here is where you are wrong. You do not want speed limits. Your own analogy shows a speed limit of 100 when it is 70. You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters. Same with your disdain for environmental laws. Repercussions and injuries mean nothing so long as you can profit from no limits. Get it?

No....speed limits are a guide. And when it comes to doing business, the entire purpose of doing business is to turn a profit, not provide jobs. However, the more profit you earn the more jobs you tend to create. Democrats are socialists that want to remove the incentive to run a business by minimizing profit, thus destroying job creation.

 

[Cellblock2429]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

/——-/ Here’s an analogy since you can’t seem to grasp our point about over regulation. President Smith is concerned about traffic saftey and reduces the national speed limit from 100 mph to 5 mph. You like President Smith, voted for him and support his safety concerns. Do you drive 5 mph on the Interstate without complaint or do you say gee, maybe over regulation isn’t so good. Let’s ramp it up to 60 mph. Get it now????

Here is where you are wrong. You do not want speed limits. Your own analogy shows a speed limit of 100 when it is 70. You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters. Same with your disdain for environmental laws. Repercussions and injuries mean nothing so long as you can profit from no limits. Get it?

/——/ Apparently I didn’t dumb it down enough for you to grasp. The 100 mph speed limit was used to demonstrate excessive speed that we all agree is dangerous. Instead of setting a reasonable speed limit of 70 President Smith went over board at set it at 5 mph. And I have no disdain for reasonable environmental laws. That’s a Strawman argument. I can’t dumb it down any more for you.

 

[Cellblock2429]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

/——-/ Here’s an analogy since you can’t seem to grasp our point about over regulation. President Smith is concerned about traffic saftey and reduces the national speed limit from 100 mph to 5 mph. You like President Smith, voted for him and support his safety concerns. Do you drive 5 mph on the Interstate without complaint or do you say gee, maybe over regulation isn’t so good. Let’s ramp it up to 60 mph. Get it now????

Here is where you are wrong. You do not want speed limits. Your own analogy shows a speed limit of 100 when it is 70. You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters. Same with your disdain for environmental laws. Repercussions and injuries mean nothing so long as you can profit from no limits. Get it?

You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters.

Were you for or against Obama's idea to raise CAFE standards to 54 MPG?

/—-/ Against - because to meet the over regulation caused manufacturers to built dangerous cars.

 

[kaz]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

So that's why you think big cities are so blue?

 

[kaz]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

That's a stupid argument since obviously you don't support zero either, cave man. You wouldn't even be able to have a fire to cook your dinner

 

[JLW]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

/——-/ Here’s an analogy since you can’t seem to grasp our point about over regulation. President Smith is concerned about traffic saftey and reduces the national speed limit from 100 mph to 5 mph. You like President Smith, voted for him and support his safety concerns. Do you drive 5 mph on the Interstate without complaint or do you say gee, maybe over regulation isn’t so good. Let’s ramp it up to 60 mph. Get it now????

Here is where you are wrong. You do not want speed limits. Your own analogy shows a speed limit of 100 when it is 70. You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters. Same with your disdain for environmental laws. Repercussions and injuries mean nothing so long as you can profit from no limits. Get it?

No....speed limits are a guide. And when it comes to doing business, the entire purpose of doing business is to turn a profit, not provide jobs. However, the more profit you earn the more jobs you tend to create. Democrats are socialists that want to remove the incentive to run a business by minimizing profit, thus destroying job creation.

Here is where you are wrong again. 1) Speed limits are not guides. They are limits which is why you get what are called tickets when you violate them. 2) It is a canard that environmental laws impede competitiveness. Environmental laws enacted in the past have made industry more efficient in many areas in the long term. Pollution after all is nothing but waste product. 3) Environmental' laws are about quality if life. For those of us who grew up with burning rivers, Love Canal, acid rain, and illegal toxic waste dumps, the EPA was a godsend and started the process of fixing these excesses. Quality of life is not secondary to shareholder value nor are dumping carcinogens in your drinking water secondary to the polluter not having to pay for the proper prevention equipment.

We are beyond wanting to live like third world peasants. At least I thought we were.

 

[JLW]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

That's a stupid argument since obviously you don't support zero either, cave man. You wouldn't even be able to have a fire to cook your dinner

I asked a question. Can you answer it Hoss or is it beyond you?

 

[kaz]

I asked a question. Can you answer it Hoss or is it beyond you?

You answer your own question first. How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you? So?

 

[JLW]

A recent study said that breathing polluted air makes people dumber.

Trump recently issues an EO to allow for more polluted air thereby making people dumber. Dumber people tend to be Trumpettes.

5 things for August 28: White House, Jacksonville, Myanmar, gerrymandering, pollution - CNN

Democrats use the EPA to increase the costs of doing business.
They use the EPA to prevent progress.
There has to be a common ground when it comes to clean air and water and doing business.
Democrat's answer is removing all production from America and sending it overseas, where the EPA has no controls.

So what environmental laws would you found acceptable? How much air and water pollution is acceptable to you?

/——-/ Here’s an analogy since you can’t seem to grasp our point about over regulation. President Smith is concerned about traffic saftey and reduces the national speed limit from 100 mph to 5 mph. You like President Smith, voted for him and support his safety concerns. Do you drive 5 mph on the Interstate without complaint or do you say gee, maybe over regulation isn’t so good. Let’s ramp it up to 60 mph. Get it now????

Here is where you are wrong. You do not want speed limits. Your own analogy shows a speed limit of 100 when it is 70. You want no limits because speed trumps safety. Regardless of the death and injury it causes others so long as others profit that is all that matters. Same with your disdain for environmental laws. Repercussions and injuries mean nothing so long as you can profit from no limits. Get it?

/——/ Apparently I didn’t dumb it down enough for you to grasp. The 100 mph speed limit was used to demonstrate excessive speed that we all agree is dangerous. Instead of setting a reasonable speed limit of 70 President Smith went over board at set it at 5 mph. And I have no disdain for reasonable environmental laws. That’s a Strawman argument. I can’t dumb it down any more for you.

The dumbing down is that you don't understand environmental laws.