Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 100,717
- 81,054
- 3,645
Ob gynReally? Like what?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ob gynReally? Like what?
Photographs in newspaper articles.
Read the 1st amendment.
You're the one believing the hoax. Like Michelle has a penis and Barrack was born in Kenya. Or Ashley showered with her dad.
your brother might tolerate you being annoying....but was that really your point? maybe it was.My bro and I have this conversation. He says things like "why are they shoving it in my face?"
The answer is so you get used to it and eventually tolerate it.
The gays want more. They don't just want you to TOLERATE it. They want you to accept them for who they are. A lot of us have this problem. For example I would accept my nephew if he told me he was gay but how would I feel if he "shoved it in my face" and kissed his boyfriends in front of me?
They want them kissing to be like a man and woman kissing. In our minds. We APPROVE. Well, neither of us are there yet. We should be though. Really, we should. Jesus would agree.
A news photographer takes a picture of the president. And runs it in a news article
How do you connect that to politics?
Trumpers are so bizarre. You think you are annoying someone, but you're just making yourself look like a gaping asshole and utter moron.With the exception of Moochelle's penis, everything else has been verified. Shitstain obama by his paternal grandmother's statements that she was there. Ashley Biden's diary verifies her father's molestation.
Enemy democrats deny everything.
![]()
Trump faces fresh backlash as he posts campaign video from Arlington cemetery visit
Former president has sparked fury after he was, firstly, captured posing with his thumbs up and smiling at a soldier’s grave and, secondly, two of his campaign staffers were accused of verbally abusing and pushing a cemetery officialwww.independent.co.uk
This is. Being deliberately obtuse in defense of this piece of shit again.
IT PLAYS THE ADD. The next thing you deny exists.LOL the independent.
More muckracking, still not any actual details.
And how would the worker there know what the photos would later be used for?
or videos later be used for?
Not taken by a campaign staffer. Not released in any campaign. Because there was no Obama campaign at that time.because the MSM works for the Dems?
Also was it a news photographer?
Where's the authorization? Present the authorization.
Twitter is not the NEWS MEDIA. They are not covered by the 1st amendment like a newspaper. It's an individualized right.Who took the photograph?
Twitter is also the media.
how so?Ob gyn
May 2013 was after Obama ran in his very last election.
Looks like a paid liar fooled you again. Talk about the easiest job ever.
U.S. President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama make a stop at Section 60 to mark the eleventh anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on September 11, 2012, at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia.
I will leave you to Google it for your big boy self.how so?
This has already been explained and debunked.The article I referenced was from then, the picture was in September 2012. This was just the first article I found with it.
From the article:
Now lets see if you can admit your failure on this, or will try to ignore it or deflect.
IT PLAYS THE ADD. The next thing you deny exists.
You're believing lies and spin my friend. Take for example the Biden diary. You believe 100% what you see about that is FACT, right?With the exception of Moochelle's penis, everything else has been verified. Shitstain obama by his paternal grandmother's statements that she was there. Ashley Biden's diary verifies her father's molestation.
Enemy democrats deny everything.
This has already been explained and debunked.
Ignore this pathetic sealioning.
Twitter is not the NEWS MEDIA. They are not covered by the 1st amendment.
As to who took the photo. It doesn't matter, it could have been press, it could have been the white house photographer, who then released them to the press.
It's funny. You keep on demanding us to back up what we claim. When provided, you simply move on to the next thing. And on and on we go. It's like trying to explain quantum physics to a belligerent toddler. Even if you can somehow explain what you're talking about, the toddler will still just stick his fingers in his ears out of sheer spite.LOL the independent.
More muckracking, still not any actual details.
And how would the worker there know what the photos would later be used for?
or videos later be used for?