Trump devotees get a dose of reality from an unlikely source.

Fox News anchor and legal analyst Shannon Bream pushed back on an assertion made by Alina Habba, one of Donald Trump’s attorneys, that President Biden is responsible for the criminal charges the former president faces in New York.

“And Joe Biden unfortunately can’t really do anything in office,” Habba said as she joined Bream, the host of “Fox News Sunday” who was broadcasting for much of the afternoon from outside the Manhattan courthouse where Trump’s trial is taking place. “So he’s got to use the same means as somebody who’s just trying to have a quick slip and fall and make money. And that is, frankly, what we’re seeing right now.

“This is exactly a Biden show because he’s got to distract the American people,” Habba continued.

“But the Biden administration is not responsible for this trial,” Bream interjected.

“How can you say the Biden administration is not responsible?” Habba shot back.

“It’s a state trial,” Bream explained. “It’s [Manhattan District Attorney] Alvin Bragg. Whether you think there’s a political motive for him, it’s not connected to the DOJ. I mean, the feds passed on these election charges.”


Habbadabadoo must have been caught off guard after being corrected by a talking head at Faux. Those folks are usually willing sycophants to Trump's horseshit propaganda. One wonders if Bream has a future at POT (party of Trump) TV.
Here is a funny parody Twitter account. It's hilarious because this is precisely how they think...

 
Devotees? "A dose of reality"? Lefties take this spin way too seriously these days. It's a non story and nothing but political banter while the media is waiting for a verdict.
 
LOL and what "crimes" did he commit? That seems to be a fundamental question that the Democrat puppets and the courts have failed to answer. Maybe you could enlighten us. :popcorn:
There is no "enlightening" you.
Brian Kilmeade, Dan Bongino, Sean Hannity, Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk, Mark Levin, Steve Bannon, Janine Pirro, Tucker Carlson, and all of Newsmax, and all the rest, have been out there parroting the SAME propaganda talking point "WHERE'S THE CRIME?"
And every single one of them knows the answer, but they also know that you don't.
That is why they keep saying it.
They know that, like everything else they put out there for you MAGAts to say.....sooner or later you'll all be repeating it.
And right on cue, here you are.....repeating the stupid question like you REALLY know something of your own.
it's hilarious to watch.
So for the HUNDREDTH time here you go.

34 counts of falsification of business records in order to conceal the crime of violating the Federal Election Campaign Act, which in 2016 made it illegal for a person to give something worth more than $2,700 to a presidential campaign. It also banned corporations from contributing to a campaign.

The jurors may also find that false information reflecting this payment was also entered on a federal tax form which is in evidence and which the jury has seen.
That is another case of falsifying business records (disguising a payout to a porn star as "attorney fees") in order to conceal another crime (tax fraud).
-
 
There is no "enlightening" you.
Brian Kilmeade, Dan Bongino, Sean Hannity, Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk, Mark Levin, Steve Bannon, Janine Pirro, Tucker Carlson, and all of Newsmax, and all the rest, have been out there parroting the SAME propaganda talking point "WHERE'S THE CRIME?"
And every single one of them knows the answer, but they also know that you don't.
That is why they keep saying it.
They know that, like everything else they put out there for you MAGAts to say.....sooner or later you'll all be repeating it.
And right on cue, here you are.....repeating the stupid question like you REALLY know something of your own.
it's hilarious to watch.
So for the HUNDREDTH time here you go.

34 counts of falsification of business records in order to conceal the crime of violating the Federal Election Campaign Act, which in 2016 made it illegal for a person to give something worth more than $2,700 to a presidential campaign. It also banned corporations from contributing to a campaign.

The jurors may also find that false information reflecting this payment was also entered on a federal tax form which is in evidence and which the jury has seen.
That is another case of falsifying business records (disguising a payout to a porn star as "attorney fees") in order to conceal another crime (tax fraud).
-

Even your echo chamber cult media - couldn't find it.
 
Bragg is a puppet of the Democratic Party and gets massive funding from the Feds and Soros and God knows who else under the table. He was handpicked just as Letitia James was to do the Democrat's dirty work at the State Level. That is how this sham trial ended up in New York City in the courtroom of the most biased Trump hating judge in America. Anyone with a modicum of common sense sees the corruption of US Justice by the Democrats.
Bragg is a puppet of the communist wing of the democratic party.
 
There is no "enlightening" you.
Brian Kilmeade, Dan Bongino, Sean Hannity, Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk, Mark Levin, Steve Bannon, Janine Pirro, Tucker Carlson, and all of Newsmax, and all the rest, have been out there parroting the SAME propaganda talking point "WHERE'S THE CRIME?"
And every single one of them knows the answer, but they also know that you don't.
That is why they keep saying it.
They know that, like everything else they put out there for you MAGAts to say.....sooner or later you'll all be repeating it.
And right on cue, here you are.....repeating the stupid question like you REALLY know something of your own.
it's hilarious to watch.
So for the HUNDREDTH time here you go.

34 counts of falsification of business records in order to conceal the crime of violating the Federal Election Campaign Act, which in 2016 made it illegal for a person to give something worth more than $2,700 to a presidential campaign. It also banned corporations from contributing to a campaign.

The jurors may also find that false information reflecting this payment was also entered on a federal tax form which is in evidence and which the jury has ahetThat is another case of falsifying business records (disguising a payout to a porn star as "attorney fees") in order to conceal another crime (tax fraud).
-
If that's the crime, this case needs to be dismissed. It belongs in federal court.
 
This is 1,000 % Political. As a matter of fact, Biden's regime has 10 advertising trucks with words such as "Convicted Felon" to flash on the trucks and other remarks such as "FELON" and "GUILTY" which will immediately be released should Trump be found Guilty. Make no mistake this entire fiasco was of Biden's command and encouragement driven by Liberals full of hate (Bragg, Merchan) for President Trump.
 
You misunderstand.un
The 34 counts of falsifying business records become felonies if the prosecution has convinced the jury that the records were falsified in order to cover up the other crimes.
I don't misunderstand. The statute on the 34 counts of falsifying business records ran long ago. They can only be charged in conjunction with the federal case, making this the wrong court. The case has already been presented to federal prosecutors who saw no case.

From the evidence presented, it really looks like no case.
 
I don't misunderstand. The statute on the 34 counts of falsifying business records ran long ago. They can only be charged in conjunction with the federal case, making this the wrong court. The case has already been presented to federal prosecutors who saw no case.

From the evidence presented, it really looks like no case.
Sounds like you need to get on the phone immediately and share this wisdom you came by through your honorary law degree from Trump University with the NY Attorney General!
 

Forum List

Back
Top