Trump has admitted obstruction of justice and other illegal acts

Of course that is another President Barron lie...proven to be just another one of his lies....because President John Barron lies on an hourly basis....that has been documented.

But with Cohen on the hook...he is going over the edge. Will Cohen flip or will he go to jail for President Barron? What a problem.....

Who is this president Barron? I thought it was president Dennison? ;)
 
Of course that is another President Barron lie...proven to be just another one of his lies....because President John Barron lies on an hourly basis....that has been documented.

But with Cohen on the hook...he is going over the edge. Will Cohen flip or will he go to jail for President Barron? What a problem.....

Who is this president Barron? I thought it was president Dennison? ;)

Ha Ha! He has used so many fake names...it's hard to keep up. Google John Barron and see what you get....too think....this idiot is president....scary....
 
Of course that is another President Barron lie...proven to be just another one of his lies....because President John Barron lies on an hourly basis....that has been documented.

But with Cohen on the hook...he is going over the edge. Will Cohen flip or will he go to jail for President Barron? What a problem.....

Who is this president Barron? I thought it was president Dennison? ;)

Ha Ha! He has used so many fake names...it's hard to keep up. Google John Barron and see what you get....too think....this idiot is president....scary....

Yep, shame on us for electing a clown - here's a good overview of Drumpf aliases.

Pseudonyms of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

6102-2T.jpg
 
Trump can always be counted on to drive democrat into a frothing hysterical meltdown. This will be the stuff of comedy for years to come.
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.
dude they think it's done under oath!!!!! go figure eh? :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.

you will be waiting and waiting and waiting for YEARS on this thread.LOL
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.

you will be waiting and waiting and waiting for YEARS on this thread.LOL
and waiting, and trump will have served eight years. haahahaahahahaaha
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.

Simply not true - Social media posts are admissible evidence that has resulted in convictions in Europe and the US. In fact - it's already influence decisions on Trump's Muslim ban (top link).

Analysis | Anything Trump tweets can be (and just was) used against him in a court of law
Could Trump's Tweets Be Used As Evidence For Obstruction Of Justice?
How to get social media evidence admitted to court
How Is Social Media Evidence Used in Criminal Cases? - joffefederaldefense.com
Arrests for offensive Facebook posts are increasing in London
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.

Not the tweets...although they add to the evidence. His own words and actions have sunk him.

Now with the Cohen information...he will be shown as the charlatan that he is.
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.

Simply not true - Social media posts are admissible evidence that has resulted in convictions in Europe and the US. In fact - it's already influence decisions on Trump's Muslim ban (top link).

Analysis | Anything Trump tweets can be (and just was) used against him in a court of law
Could Trump's Tweets Be Used As Evidence For Obstruction Of Justice?
How to get social media evidence admitted to court
How Is Social Media Evidence Used in Criminal Cases? - joffefederaldefense.com
Arrests for offensive Facebook posts are increasing in London
post something to back that up.
 
Of course that is another President Barron lie...proven to be just another one of his lies....because President John Barron lies on an hourly basis....that has been documented.

But with Cohen on the hook...he is going over the edge. Will Cohen flip or will he go to jail for President Barron? What a problem.....

Who is this president Barron? I thought it was president Dennison? ;)

Ha Ha! He has used so many fake names...it's hard to keep up. Google John Barron and see what you get....too think....this idiot is president....scary....

Well, you know, when the opposite party nominates a known corrupt criminal, this is what ya get to clean up the state of affairs.


The funny thing is that so many folks in the nation actually believe what the MSM says, every last goofy thing that they say about him.

Even when you try to tell them that the security intelligence professionals are embedded in every MSM outlet they are reading and viewing, do they care? NOPE, they gladly gobble up the brainwashing.


39bc9ee3c29b7ce46745a0e2a02ea837.jpg

C7Ksn8nVsAAHAir.jpg

edward_bernays.jpg
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.

Simply not true - Social media posts are admissible evidence that has resulted in convictions in Europe and the US. In fact - it's already influence decisions on Trump's Muslim ban (top link).

Analysis | Anything Trump tweets can be (and just was) used against him in a court of law
Could Trump's Tweets Be Used As Evidence For Obstruction Of Justice?
How to get social media evidence admitted to court
How Is Social Media Evidence Used in Criminal Cases? - joffefederaldefense.com
Arrests for offensive Facebook posts are increasing in London
post something to back that up.

I just did - Do you need your hand held? :itsok:
 
Trump convinced Cohen won't 'flip' as he hits out at 'drugged up' former aide

Trump tweets Cohen won't flip.

That is a confession that he has done something illegal. Cohen would have nothing to "flip" about, unless Trump has done something illegal.

He has also recently confessed to obstruction of justice in a tweet.

He tweeted there was no obstruction (other than fight back) and collusion. In his poor grammar (should have wrote fighting back) he admitted that he was obstructing justice by fighting back.

This is in addition to his nationally televised confession to obstruction of justice.

Mueller has a solid case for obstruction of justice at the very least.


Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.

Simply not true - Social media posts are admissible evidence that has resulted in convictions in Europe and the US. In fact - it's already influence decisions on Trump's Muslim ban (top link).

Analysis | Anything Trump tweets can be (and just was) used against him in a court of law
Could Trump's Tweets Be Used As Evidence For Obstruction Of Justice?
How to get social media evidence admitted to court
How Is Social Media Evidence Used in Criminal Cases? - joffefederaldefense.com
Arrests for offensive Facebook posts are increasing in London
post something to back that up.

I just did - Do you need your hand held? :itsok:
Yup, sure do.

Which specific case was turned b/c of a tweet.
 
Right on target Goodbud. In the end, Dotard's tweets will be one of the final nails in his coffin.

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Find for me any case in jurisprudence history, not High Crimes and Misdemeanors mind you, just any crimes, where tweets from a twitter account had been admitted as a deciding factor of evidence.

Simply not true - Social media posts are admissible evidence that has resulted in convictions in Europe and the US. In fact - it's already influence decisions on Trump's Muslim ban (top link).

Analysis | Anything Trump tweets can be (and just was) used against him in a court of law
Could Trump's Tweets Be Used As Evidence For Obstruction Of Justice?
How to get social media evidence admitted to court
How Is Social Media Evidence Used in Criminal Cases? - joffefederaldefense.com
Arrests for offensive Facebook posts are increasing in London
post something to back that up.

I just did - Do you need your hand held? :itsok:
Yup, sure do.

Which specific case was turned b/c of a tweet.

My top link - Trump's tweets about a Muslim ban were instrumental in several court decisions.

Why do you think his tweets are driving his lawyers bonkers?
 
Compare Nixon and Clinton during their investigations. Both lawyers..they knew better than to run their mouth like the orange clown.

Not even Nixon obstructed justice like President Dennison....or whatever he is calling himself these days.
 

Forum List

Back
Top