I'll take your gibberish as a no; you don't have any hard evidence - just empty rhetoric.No, I was here, and paying close attention.Election fraud.You gave me nothing.If you have evidence of widespread fraud, show it. Trump had none which is why he was tossed from court more than five dozen times ... including by judges who he appointed.There's always election fraud, but it is not exclusively from one side of the aisle.I'm 75, I don't get hot and bothered much anymore. But keep trying, Trump's failed court cases convinced morons that there was an election theft.What's funny is that you are inferring an absolute, a logical fallacy.You don't make points, you just rattle on about boogeymen and generalizations.I wasn't commenting on what I don't like to be called but on the weakness in your habit of invoking the boogeyman.Regarding Kaz's Law, it's virtually a certainty that a wingnut can't finish three sentences without deploying the word leftist.Aww, poor guy. Thanks for letting me know you're bothered by my avatar.
And yes, someone complaining about gas prices under Biden while ignoring gas prices under Trump, which were just 0.066¢ lower a year ago, is a fucking nut. Did that hit too close to home for you too?
Your avatar is hilarious. I love it. It clearly identifies you as the nut that you are. And that you pick Trump as your self selected self image is hilarious. It's funny as hell, angry fascist man
You don't like being identified as the leftist that you are? Hit a nerve there, huh? Why exactly would it bother you to be called a leftist when you endlessly advocate leftist ideology?
BOO!
Then why can't you debate any of my points rather than objecting to a word I used correctly, fascist?
Try offering a proposition followed by evidence and than draw a conclusion. Here's a tip for you, avoid name-calling, and keep adjectives to a minimum. You might be surprised.
The guy calling anyone who isn't a Democrat having a "Trump crush" is whining about "generalizations" again, LOL. Funny stuff.
That' while the number of Democrats fighting Democrat fascism is actually zero
So now we have two. First you got all hot and bothered I called you a leftist, you ignored my question how you're not. Now you're all hot and bothered defending that Democrats aren't fascist, but you can't show any Democrat who has opposed violence, firing and other Democrat party fascism to destroy their opposition
John Lewis opposed non-violence so I just proved you wrong that I couldn't name any. Perhaps you now appreciate why I harp about the fallacious use of absolutes. You lose.
You're just blathering. There was election fraud. Democrats removed vote counting ability all going into the election. They didn't do that to not cheat. But even if there wasn't, this used to be a free country to state our opinion. That Trump stating his opinion is illegal is why you are now just a fascist party. Calling for violence means DIRECTLY CALLING FOR VIOLENCE. Or it used to until the fascist Democrats started attacking and destroying your opposition as you delve deeper and deeper into fascism.
Note you're silent to the flagrant hypocrisy that Democrats stoked hatred all summer in people who went out and murdered people and you're silent about it, leftist fascist
More importantly, there has been no evidence presented to even hint at WIDESPREAD fraud.
If we are to have any meaningful conversation, you need to quit generalizing about who I am. I have no cotton to violence perpetrated by anyone, be they antifa or WS groups. Neither do I dismiss black anger over the cold-blooded murder of George Floyd.
My profession has me intimately familiar with the difficulty of getting inside of someone's head and proving the likes of fraud. Hence, I appreciate your complaint about calling for violence. The Dems made the wrong charge. They should have confined themselves to the disgraceful way he dragged his feet in reacting to the riot. Had he been a soldier in time of war, and so abandoned his duty and post, he would have been stood before a firing squad and shot.
Democrats cheated systematically in the open and stole the election. They directly removed monitors and any ability to verify voters and stole the election. To say some Republican cheated somewhere and so it's the same is more of your stupid crap
But, he made enough noise with his bull to con people like you. Open your eyes, you've been had.
I already gave you two examples and you ignored them
Let's have a link to something specific.
You were blathering on you wanted support for something you apparently couldn't identify.
Let me know when you figure out the subject
I'm asking you for a link to something that establishes that there was widespread fraud.
What do you have?
You need a link to my first two examples that Democrats moved election monitors away from the counters and Democrats eliminated barriers to linking votes to legal voters? Seriously? Where were you during the election? Were you out of the country, stoned off your ass or in a Democrat party cult?
Keep coming back with nothing and I'll keep pounding you.
Pounding me, LOL. You were paying close attention while the thieves were walking right past you. You'll believe anything, it's hilarious
OldBlue: I'm not a leftist, kaz
OldBlue: kaz, what's a leftist?
LOL.
Oh, and you don't know about Democrats keeping Republicans away from vote counters, no idea. And you don't know about Democrats changing voting rules. When did that happen?
And now, answers, you demand I answer your questions!
You're a joke, boy
