Trump Indicted

[Leo123]

That's what they're in court for.

read the indictment

The indictment proves norhing.

 

[Leo123]

Well...do something about it then! (next you'll complain about the use of the term "horse power")

I am. I’m educating you and taking shit for it!

 

[meaner gene]

.

The indictment proves norhing.

Not unless you read it

 

[Leo123]

.
Not unless you read it

You obviously believe fairy stories.

 

[Faun]

The indictment proves norhing.

That's correct. That's what the trial is for.

 

[bodecea]

Can you point out which boxes had classified material in them?

Can you point out which boxes don't and what they have instead of classified material?

 

[meaner gene]

You obviously believe fairy stories.

You probably said the same of the Robert Mueller indictments.

 

[meaner gene]

That's correct. That's what the trial is for.

Yet the indictment does speak volumes. And even has photographs and explains the timeline of events.

 

[Couchpotato]

Which he was supposed to return after the NARA asked for them back.

That wasnt the debate.

You do know that the Rapist and Traitor removed Classified Documents before he scuttled like rat out D.C. right?

Also, his to many to name trips while a one-term wonder to Shit-A-Lago, he took material with him, you did know that didn't you?

Or are dense enough to think that he did it in just one move.

what I know is you’re not following the discussion and just was to spout off at the mouth.

 

[Couchpotato]

.
Not unless you read it

By its nature an indictment doesn’t prove anything.

 

[Delldude]

A president can decide which non-classified or unclassified material is personal property versus presidential records... a president can also initiate the process to declassify classified materials ... but a former president cannot retain possession of classified documents. It's crazy to even think that they can.

If He declassified them, He can possess them.

“Amy Berman Jackson, the judge presiding on that case, said a couple of very important things,” said Farrell. “That the president had an absolute, unreviewable right to take any records or documents that he wants when he leaves office. “

“No one can come back and second guess or double think or ask questions about what the president elects to take with him,” Farrell continued.

In her ruling, Jackson wrote that “the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: ‘[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.’”

Farrell points out that this ruling has existed without challenge or question for ten years.
Court ruling

Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump

A decade old legal case that could exonerate former President Donald Trump has been buried by legacy media.

www.oann.com

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There it is. The CONspiracy catch all.
The loser hole.

Oh cultist of the trump Russian collusion cult

 

[Delldude]

Can you point out which boxes don't and what they have instead of classified material?

Looks like there's more boxes than classified documents retrieved.

 

[Synthaholic]

You don't know? It's Ken Starr.

Trump never had a Congress, there was a 1 R majority with about 10 RINOS in it.

You're a dishonest shitbird.

Nancy Pelosi got all Democrats to vote in unison. Donald Trump wasn't as strong as Nancy Pelosi?

OK, we'll go with that.

 

[Synthaholic]

S

Looks like there's more boxes than classified documents retrieved.

So he's still hiding documents?

 

[Faun]

If He declassified them, He can possess them.

“Amy Berman Jackson, the judge presiding on that case, said a couple of very important things,” said Farrell. “That the president had an absolute, unreviewable right to take any records or documents that he wants when he leaves office. “

“No one can come back and second guess or double think or ask questions about what the president elects to take with him,” Farrell continued.

In her ruling, Jackson wrote that “the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: ‘[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.’”

Farrell points out that this ruling has existed without challenge or question for ten years.
Court ruling

Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump

A decade old legal case that could exonerate former President Donald Trump has been buried by legacy media.

www.oann.com

He didn't declassify them all.

 

[RhinelandCityLimits]

the 1/6 videos to Tucker Carlson.

Ya misspelt: Joseph Goebbels

Special counsel describes gravity of alleged crime

 

[0311]

Can you point out which boxes don't and what they have instead of classified material?

Like his Orange God, he knows because he see's it in his brain...if he has one.

 

[0311]

If He declassified them, He can possess them.

“Amy Berman Jackson, the judge presiding on that case, said a couple of very important things,” said Farrell. “That the president had an absolute, unreviewable right to take any records or documents that he wants when he leaves office. “

“No one can come back and second guess or double think or ask questions about what the president elects to take with him,” Farrell continued.

In her ruling, Jackson wrote that “the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: ‘[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.’”

Farrell points out that this ruling has existed without challenge or question for ten years.
Court ruling

Judicial Watch: Clinton Sock Drawer Audio Tape Case Exonerates Pres. Trump

A decade old legal case that could exonerate former President Donald Trump has been buried by legacy media.

www.oann.com

Except of course the fact that he could not declassify the documents. The Rapist and Traitor admits he did not have the power to declassify them. You ignore facts presented to you.

 

[0311]

That wasnt the debate.

what I know is you’re not following the discussion and just was to spout off at the mouth.

What you would a quarter ounce shot glass and still leave for a shot of Kentucky Sour Mash.

It is a matter of record that Rapist and Traitor had his valet move boxes around at Shit-A-Lago. Boxes were taken the WH over a period months, that is also known. It's not that your are not brightest light bulb in box, it's you are bulb that was rejected for being defective.