Trump is Churchill, Obama is Chaimberlain

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2015
109,396
27,040
2,220
Churchill was hated by his own party, opposition party, and press. Feared by King as reckless, and despised for his bluntness. But unlike Neville Chamberlain, he didn't retreat. We had a Chamberlain for 8 yrs; in Trump we have a Churchill.
 
Churchill had brains rump doesn't. I am sure your comparison has Churchill rolling in his grave in horror.
 
Churchill was hated by his own party, opposition party, and press. Feared by King as reckless, and despised for his bluntness. But unlike Neville Chamberlain, he didn't retreat. We had a Chamberlain for 8 yrs; in Trump we have a Churchill.

What is trump not retreating from?
 
Churchill had brains rump doesn't. I am sure your comparison has Churchill rolling in his grave in horror.
Donald Trump has been a success at everything he has tried including politics at the highest level. It is highly unlikely you can achieve that without being extremely intelligent. No one is that lucky.
 
Churchill had brains rump doesn't. I am sure your comparison has Churchill rolling in his grave in horror.
Donald Trump has been a success at everything he has tried including politics at the highest level. It is highly unlikely you can achieve that without being extremely intelligent. No one is that lucky.

Actually he has not really been all that successful as a businessman until he got out of the business of making business decisions. Up until the time that Trump Inc was reorganized as a holding company and a licensing company for the name "Trump", his business failed on a regular basis.

He failed about owning an airline, he failed at owning casinos, steak company, and more.
 
Churchill had brains rump doesn't. I am sure your comparison has Churchill rolling in his grave in horror.
Donald Trump has been a success at everything he has tried including politics at the highest level. It is highly unlikely you can achieve that without being extremely intelligent. No one is that lucky.
Unlike Churchill Trump has not caused a disaster like the Dardenelles nor has he pulled a boneheaded bit of planning that forced a retreat to Dunkirk instead of Calais. What was the idiocy that Trump pulled comparable to that which that led to the disaster at Narvik? Or wait did Tax Man take the short bus to school?
 
200w_d.gif
100.gif
23131969_10207745825322928_7494661033498566359_n.jpg

trump-putin-afp-478x257.jpg
 
Churchill was hated by his own party, opposition party, and press. Feared by King as reckless, and despised for his bluntness. But unlike Neville Chamberlain, he didn't retreat. We had a Chamberlain for 8 yrs; in Trump we have a Churchill.

The delusion in the OP is so sad. That anyone would even entertain such a thought doesn't speak well for the human race. It's one thing to not like a politician, it is quite another thing to mindfuck yourself into believing crap like the OP.
 
Churchill was hated by his own party, opposition party, and press. Feared by King as reckless, and despised for his bluntness. But unlike Neville Chamberlain, he didn't retreat. We had a Chamberlain for 8 yrs; in Trump we have a Churchill.
I am seeing Trump more like a "Lord Haw-Haw" type ....
51YDPSN3J1L._SX314_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
 
Churchill was hated by his own party, opposition party, and press. Feared by King as reckless, and despised for his bluntness. But unlike Neville Chamberlain, he didn't retreat. We had a Chamberlain for 8 yrs; in Trump we have a Churchill.

Churchill fought in the Sudan, in South Africa, he had military experience.

Trump had his own personal Vietnam, something to do with not fighting at all.

Churchill was hardly hated by his own party, they put him in as PM. Had Trump been in the UK, he'd never have made it into politics.
 

Forum List

Back
Top