Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a conundrum.
I want children, but I'm gay. SMH
law.stanford.edu
In his opinion, Justice Kennedy cites as one of the major reasons “for protecting the right to marry is that it safeguards children and families…. By giving recognition and legal structure to their parents’ relationship, marriage allows children to understand the integrity and closeness of their own family and its concord with other families in their community and in their daily lives…. Marriage also affords the permanency and stability important to children’s best interests…. Without the recognition, stability, and predictability marriage offers … children suffer the stigma of knowing their families are somehow lesser…. The marriage laws at issue here thus harm and humiliate the children of same-sex couples.”
The total switch in the understanding the interests of children is a major factor in the dramatic shift in judicial treatment of same sex couple relationships (it is less than fifteen years since laws criminalizing these relationships were declared unconstitutional in Lawrence v. Texas). How did this change occur?
Finally, over the past thirty years, many states have allowed, even encouraged, gay individuals to become foster and adoptive parents; this was true of several of the plaintiffs in the current cases. From both research and case examples, it is clear that these children do very well. Moreover, as Justice Kennedy stated, the fact that states allow adoption and foster care by gay couples “…provides powerful confirmation from the law itself that gays and lesbians can create loving, supportive families.” A state allowing adoption by gay couples can hardly claim that such parenting is bad.
Those are not gay men. They are regressed or fixated pedophiles who do not have age appropriate relationships. Having sexual contact with someone of the same sex does not mean that someone is a homosexualStands to reason, doesn't it? Since 95% plus of men are straight men. But as a percentage of a group, gay men abuse children more.
See post 21Let'em be fake married.
Just leave children out of it
See post 21
Selected excerpts:
So what? They can be are a PARENTSMight as well be, two men can't produce children and the same with two women.
Feel free to wallow in your blissful ignoranceSee post 21
Thanks for re-affirming that you are just not that brightFinally, over the past thirty years, many states have allowed, even encouraged, gay individuals to become foster and adoptive parents; this was true of several of the plaintiffs in the current cases. From both research and case examples, it is clear that these children do very well. Moreover, as Justice Kennedy stated, the fact that states allow adoption and foster care by gay couples “…provides powerful confirmation from the law itself that gays and lesbians can create loving, supportive families.” A state allowing adoption by gay couples can hardly claim that such parenting is bad.
Thanks for re-affirming gay couples can't produce children.
Feel free to wallow in your blissful ignorance
I hope she got money up front, in cash.Yoel Roth, the man responsible for permanently banning Trump, tweeted about euthanizing children and advocated for gay high school sex. Read that again. Slowly.
Trump lawyer says marriage bill will lead to the end of marriage equality entirely
She also compared gay couples marrying to pedophilia.www.lgbtqnation.com
Another question: why are you so focused on them?Another question: If transsexuals are gay and involve themselves in sexually-suggestive displays in front of children, would that be considered "pedophillic"?
So what? They can be are a PARENTS
Many opposite sex couples can't produce children on their own either
In anycase, having children is not a requirement of marriage
Trump liked his young too. He changed out his wives every few years.Throughout recorded history, there has always been a branch of male homosexuality that prefers their “partners” very young.
Thanks for re-affirming that you are just not that bright
Another question: why are you so focused on them?
You are assuming they are. You are very focused on finding stories about them.Why would anyone one not be? If mentally-ill perverts were making sexually-suggestive displays in front of your children, you wouldn't be concerned?
Or would you just say "Oh how brave and stunning they are"?
You are assuming they are. You are very focused on finding stories about them.
You responded.Did I start this thread?
