Lakhota
Diamond Member
- Jul 14, 2011
- 166,469
- 90,835
Judges in New York ruled that the defamation lawsuit from former āApprenticeā contestant Summer Zervos, who accused Trump of groping, can proceed.
NEW YORK (AP) ā A former contestant on āThe Apprenticeā who accused President Donald Trump of unwanted kissing and groping can move forward with her defamation lawsuit against him, a state appeals court ruled Thursday, raising the prospect that a sitting president could be called for sworn questioning.
A panel of judges on the Supreme Court Appellate Division said in their ruling, in a case brought by Summer Zervos, that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution doesnāt require trials in state court to be delayed until the president is out of office.
Citing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling two decades ago in a case involving alleged sexual misconduct by President Bill Clinton, a majority of judges on the panel said presidents can be sued in state courts over things they did that arenāt related to their official duties.
āThe current sitting President attempts to shield himself from consequences for his alleged unofficial misconduct by relying upon the constitutional protection of the Presidency,ā the judges said in an opinion written by Justice Dianne T. Renwick. āWe reject defendant President Trumpās argument that the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents a New York State court ā and every other state court in the country ā from exercising its authority under its state constitution. Instead, we find that the Supremacy Clause was never intended to deprive a state court of its authority to decide cases and controversies under the stateās constitution.ā
More: Donald Trump Might Be Forced To Testify In Sexual Misconduct Case
Great news! Summer Zervos deserves her day in court. What do you think?
NEW YORK (AP) ā A former contestant on āThe Apprenticeā who accused President Donald Trump of unwanted kissing and groping can move forward with her defamation lawsuit against him, a state appeals court ruled Thursday, raising the prospect that a sitting president could be called for sworn questioning.
A panel of judges on the Supreme Court Appellate Division said in their ruling, in a case brought by Summer Zervos, that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution doesnāt require trials in state court to be delayed until the president is out of office.
Citing a U.S. Supreme Court ruling two decades ago in a case involving alleged sexual misconduct by President Bill Clinton, a majority of judges on the panel said presidents can be sued in state courts over things they did that arenāt related to their official duties.
āThe current sitting President attempts to shield himself from consequences for his alleged unofficial misconduct by relying upon the constitutional protection of the Presidency,ā the judges said in an opinion written by Justice Dianne T. Renwick. āWe reject defendant President Trumpās argument that the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prevents a New York State court ā and every other state court in the country ā from exercising its authority under its state constitution. Instead, we find that the Supremacy Clause was never intended to deprive a state court of its authority to decide cases and controversies under the stateās constitution.ā
More: Donald Trump Might Be Forced To Testify In Sexual Misconduct Case
Great news! Summer Zervos deserves her day in court. What do you think?
