Trump posts 2018 signed letter from Stormy Daniels that destroys the Democrats’ hush money witch hunt

They were both threatening to go public in order to damage Trump and make $$$$$ Most people call that extortion.

You of course can call it anything you want.

But it's not extortion. Extortion is them going to Trump and saying pay me or I will tell the story. They didn't they were shopping the story to the media and the campaign went to them.

It's not a bad thing to let people know prior to an election about FPOTUS#45's adulterous affairs and be compensated by the media. On the condition that the allegations are true.

WW
 
You change this...

Code:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lomGqashcAo

... to this ...

Code:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lomGqashcAo&t=115

Understood, I saw that with the code.

I'm wondering was the additional "&t=115" as the time stamp to go to 01:55 something that was copied or did you hand enter it and how did you know 115 = 01:55?

WW
 
They were both threatening to go public in order to damage Trump and make $$$$$ Most people call that extortion.

She still didn't seek money from Trump. Over a dozen other women also sought to go public with their accounts of Trump sexually assaulting them. Were they committing extortion too?
 
Understood, I saw that with the code.

I'm wondering was the additional "&t=115" as the time stamp to go to 01:55 something that was copied or did you hand enter it and how did you know 115 = 01:55?

WW

t=<number of seconds>
 
You of course can call it anything you want.

But it's not extortion. Extortion is them going to Trump and saying pay me or I will tell the story. They didn't they were shopping the story to the media and the campaign went to them.

Again, I don't see the difference. I go to various media claiming I had an adulterous affair with WorldWatcher, knowing very well that it's going to get back to you.


It's not a bad thing to let people know prior to an election about FPOTUS#45's adulterous affairs and be compensated by the media. On the condition that the allegations are true.

WW
 
Again, I don't see the difference. I go to various media claiming I had an adulterous affair with WorldWatcher, knowing very well that it's going to get back to you.

Of course you don't see the difference.

We know you'd just rather use inflammatory language implying illegal activity (and yes extortion is illegal).

WW
 
Of course you don't see the difference.

We know you'd just rather use inflammatory language implying illegal activity (and yes extortion is illegal).

WW
LOL Inflammatory language like "insurrection" (and yes insurrection is illegal) which has been adopted as gospel by your cult?
 
LOL Inflammatory language like "insurrection" (and yes insurrection is illegal) which has been adopted as gospel by your cult?

Why not use insurrection, a majority of both chambers (house and senate) of congress have voted and called it that - twice.

WW
 
Shit man
Trump controlled the Justice Dept for four years
If it was a crime, why didn’t he prosecute Stormy?

Maybe the same reason he didn’t prosecute Hillary
Um entrenched deep state leftwingers infest all government agencies.
 
Why not use insurrection, a majority of both chambers (house and senate) of congress have voted and called it that - twice.

WW
Because it's inflammatory language that implies something illegal, and, in over 3,000 charges filed by the DOJ not a single person has been charges with insurrection.
 
I have no idea.
  • How many corporate executives in New York were running a Presidential Campaigns?
  • How many of that group boinked a porn star while their wife was at home having just given birth to his son?
  • Then how many of that group had a fixer lawyer break the law to pay the porn star not to revive previously published media stories (6 year old?) about the boinking?
  • Then how many of that group had their lawyer commit criminal campaign finance law violation and went to prison?
  • Then how many of that group committed felony business record falsification to hide and aid in the crime that the fixer lawyer engaged in?
By the time you start at the top bullet and keep narrowing it down to the last bullet, I'd say it's either (a) a unique situation for the relevant events, or (b) not many.

WW
LOL Got it. You're going with the Hochul assurances to the business community - 'Don't worry we're only going to pull this bullshit on Trump, you are completely safe here.' LOL
 
Falsifying business records in NY is just a misdemeanor and subject to a fine.

Falsifying business records to coverup a crime, however, is a felony which can include a prison sentence.
So, what was the crime he was “covering up”?
 

Forum List

Back
Top