Trump says he confronted Putin over election hacking...also, it wasn't Russia!

Poor righties. Now they have to defend Trump saying he talked tough to Putin while also saying there is nothing to confront Putin over.

They have to defend Putin and Trump who says they didn't hack but also they did hack..while also saying the Intel agencies don't know Russia hacked.

Basically they have to say water is wet and so what if it's dry!

Well -- since not ONE FEDERAL Counter Cyber person EVER saw or touched the DNC server --- there is NO PROOF. Which is what I've been telling y'all all along. If it was a fucking international incidence -- that server and Podesta's phone should have been BAGGED AND TAGGED and taken "into evidence"...

But it didn't happen. Did it??


The same people that hacked the DNC hacked several state voting offices and Republicans running against Trump.

Don't know that. Russia is a big place. My clients get hacked by 3 or 4 govts a year. AND -- since no EQUIPMENT was taken into custody -- and those 3 or 4 VERY EXPENSIVE Counter Cyber govt groups were NEVER USED --- we don't have good enough to ARGUE with Putin about it. Because if Putin DIDN'T do it -- he knows it.. And if he DID -- he would never jeopardize those sources and methods by releasing the wad of stuff to Wikileaks.

The whole PURPOSE of that kind of espionage is to hold the stolen INFO SECRET -- so you have leverage over the people you stole it from. It's of NO USE to Putin as blackmail -- if it's dumped out in public..

Evidently -- no one in the previous Admin thought it was a biggie...


Ask Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio how big of a deal they thought it was that they were hacked. Why do you think Graham is so hell bent to hold Russia accountable for their actions? If Russia can hack all the people that they did, who knows who is the next Hillary Clinton to have all their private information put out there to keep them from winning an election? Trump supports think it is all great this time... until the next election when the hacking gets people they don't like elected.

No.. Now you're just confused. Graham and Paul and Rubio were NOT HACKED. They were SPIED ON by that Big Brother Domestic Spying that you bought for NSA.. THEY are not blaming any foreign power. They KNOW that Patriot Act 702 collection was the weapon.. And THAT belonged to Obama at the time of the crimes..
 
People in the intelligence community used to put their lives on the line to keep this country protected.

Now, Republicans sell them out. Trump gives their info to the enemy for free and believes Russia over them.

So why should they continue to try to protect this country? Republicans sh!t on their work. Calls them liars. What would you do? Continue to put your life on the line just to be threatened by Russian lackeys?
Derp Derp Derp we go
Gently down the stream
Trolling trolling trolling trolling
RDerp lives in a dream.
To your kind, "facts" are the dream.
 
People in the intelligence community used to put their lives on the line to keep this country protected.

Now, Republicans sell them out. Trump gives their info to the enemy for free and believes Russia over them.

So why should they continue to try to protect this country? Republicans sh!t on their work. Calls them liars. What would you do? Continue to put your life on the line just to be threatened by Russian lackeys?
Derp Derp Derp we go
Gently down the stream
Trolling trolling trolling trolling
RDerp lives in a dream.
To your kind, "facts" are the dream.
To my kind, mocking fools like you comes easy.
 
Poor righties. Now they have to defend Trump saying he talked tough to Putin while also saying there is nothing to confront Putin over.

They have to defend Putin and Trump who says they didn't hack but also they did hack..while also saying the Intel agencies don't know Russia hacked.

Basically they have to say water is wet and so what if it's dry!

Well -- since not ONE FEDERAL Counter Cyber person EVER saw or touched the DNC server --- there is NO PROOF. Which is what I've been telling y'all all along. If it was a fucking international incidence -- that server and Podesta's phone should have been BAGGED AND TAGGED and taken "into evidence"...

But it didn't happen. Did it??


The same people that hacked the DNC hacked several state voting offices and Republicans running against Trump.

Don't know that. Russia is a big place. My clients get hacked by 3 or 4 govts a year. AND -- since no EQUIPMENT was taken into custody -- and those 3 or 4 VERY EXPENSIVE Counter Cyber govt groups were NEVER USED --- we don't have good enough to ARGUE with Putin about it. Because if Putin DIDN'T do it -- he knows it.. And if he DID -- he would never jeopardize those sources and methods by releasing the wad of stuff to Wikileaks.

The whole PURPOSE of that kind of espionage is to hold the stolen INFO SECRET -- so you have leverage over the people you stole it from. It's of NO USE to Putin as blackmail -- if it's dumped out in public..

Evidently -- no one in the previous Admin thought it was a biggie...


Ask Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio how big of a deal they thought it was that they were hacked. Why do you think Graham is so hell bent to hold Russia accountable for their actions? If Russia can hack all the people that they did, who knows who is the next Hillary Clinton to have all their private information put out there to keep them from winning an election? Trump supports think it is all great this time... until the next election when the hacking gets people they don't like elected.

No.. Now you're just confused. Graham and Paul and Rubio were NOT HACKED. They were SPIED ON by that Big Brother Domestic Spying that you bought for NSA.. THEY are not blaming any foreign power. They KNOW that Patriot Act 702 collection was the weapon.. And THAT belonged to Obama at the time of the crimes..


Wrong. They have admitted they were hacked by Russia. I'm sorry but you are starting to sound like Mindwars now.
 
Hey, the Russians didn't hack the election because apparently the elections are inside DMC servers lmao!!

Hey, they found thousands of fake news Russian sites and bots but...that doesn't mean anything because....DNC SERVERS!!

:badgrin:
 
Poor righties. Now they have to defend Trump saying he talked tough to Putin while also saying there is nothing to confront Putin over.

They have to defend Putin and Trump who says they didn't hack but also they did hack..while also saying the Intel agencies don't know Russia hacked.

Basically they have to say water is wet and so what if it's dry!

Well -- since not ONE FEDERAL Counter Cyber person EVER saw or touched the DNC server --- there is NO PROOF. Which is what I've been telling y'all all along. If it was a fucking international incidence -- that server and Podesta's phone should have been BAGGED AND TAGGED and taken "into evidence"...

But it didn't happen. Did it??
Of course not because the internal dirty laundry of the DNC was likely miles worse than any traceable hack lead. That's why Obama didn't care. In order to bust Russia he would have had to take down the entire DNC and half the media.
uhhhhh, very flimsy....

1. have you forgotten all the hacked emails were RELEASED ALREADY on to wikileaks...? What's left to hide?

2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.
 

Those are CNN stories. Read them carefully. Rubio NEVER is quoted with any evidence that Russians hacked his account other than having a Russian IP address.

I can get a fixed Russian IP Address for $19 a month.... It's not EVIDENCE...

CNN is entirely into writing fiction now.

Dude... they have been directly quoted. It has nothing to do with CNN putting a spin on it. do a Google search and find the hundreds of sources about them.
 
2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.

Everything the DNC ALLOWED to be released went to the FBI. Not a full forensics job. DNC PAID for that report. So the DNC decided how much to release. THEY controlled the story..

NO private company has the abilities of a multi-billion-$$$$ GOVT counter cyber group with intel connections, satellites, covert recording of Russian intelligence, etc... Especially one that just got on it's feet 2 or 3 years before the event took place..
 
Poor righties. Now they have to defend Trump saying he talked tough to Putin while also saying there is nothing to confront Putin over.

They have to defend Putin and Trump who says they didn't hack but also they did hack..while also saying the Intel agencies don't know Russia hacked.

Basically they have to say water is wet and so what if it's dry!

Well -- since not ONE FEDERAL Counter Cyber person EVER saw or touched the DNC server --- there is NO PROOF. Which is what I've been telling y'all all along. If it was a fucking international incidence -- that server and Podesta's phone should have been BAGGED AND TAGGED and taken "into evidence"...

But it didn't happen. Did it??
Of course not because the internal dirty laundry of the DNC was likely miles worse than any traceable hack lead. That's why Obama didn't care. In order to bust Russia he would have had to take down the entire DNC and half the media.
uhhhhh, very flimsy....

1. have you forgotten all the hacked emails were RELEASED ALREADY on to wikileaks...? What's left to hide?

2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.

Hahahaa...good point, the emails were released and these goofballs are saying they don't know if the servers were hacked because they didn't looks at the servers. As if the emails could've came from anywhere EXCEPT the goddam servers!!

These guys are a hoot!
 
Poor righties. Now they have to defend Trump saying he talked tough to Putin while also saying there is nothing to confront Putin over.

They have to defend Putin and Trump who says they didn't hack but also they did hack..while also saying the Intel agencies don't know Russia hacked.

Basically they have to say water is wet and so what if it's dry!

Well -- since not ONE FEDERAL Counter Cyber person EVER saw or touched the DNC server --- there is NO PROOF. Which is what I've been telling y'all all along. If it was a fucking international incidence -- that server and Podesta's phone should have been BAGGED AND TAGGED and taken "into evidence"...

But it didn't happen. Did it??
Of course not because the internal dirty laundry of the DNC was likely miles worse than any traceable hack lead. That's why Obama didn't care. In order to bust Russia he would have had to take down the entire DNC and half the media.
uhhhhh, very flimsy....

1. have you forgotten all the hacked emails were RELEASED ALREADY on to wikileaks...? What's left to hide?

2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.

Hahahaa...good point, the emails were released and these goofballs are saying they don't know if the servers were hacked because they didn't looks at the servers. As if the emails could've came from anywhere EXCEPT the goddam servers!!

These guys are a hoot!

Which idiots are saying the emails leaked themselves without a hack? That's not possible. It IS possible and HIGHLY LIKELY THO -- that those servers were compromised MORE THAN ONCE by more than one bad actor.. And the PROFESSIONALS don't make it easy to trace their work. AND a full blown SuperPower Intel Group would NOT compromise their sources and methods and toss them under the bus just to release stuff to the press.

So Cozy Bear and Shitty Bear and all that nonsense would NOT BE agents of the Russian Govt. Because Intel Agencies don't EXPOSE themselves that way...
 

Those are CNN stories. Read them carefully. Rubio NEVER is quoted with any evidence that Russians hacked his account other than having a Russian IP address.

I can get a fixed Russian IP Address for $19 a month.... It's not EVIDENCE...

CNN is entirely into writing fiction now.

Dude... they have been directly quoted. It has nothing to do with CNN putting a spin on it. do a Google search and find the hundreds of sources about them.

Go back to the Rubio QUOTES.. Show me anything OTHER than a IP address that was a sign of Russian hacking.
 
Poor righties. Now they have to defend Trump saying he talked tough to Putin while also saying there is nothing to confront Putin over.

They have to defend Putin and Trump who says they didn't hack but also they did hack..while also saying the Intel agencies don't know Russia hacked.

Basically they have to say water is wet and so what if it's dry!

Well -- since not ONE FEDERAL Counter Cyber person EVER saw or touched the DNC server --- there is NO PROOF. Which is what I've been telling y'all all along. If it was a fucking international incidence -- that server and Podesta's phone should have been BAGGED AND TAGGED and taken "into evidence"...

But it didn't happen. Did it??
Of course not because the internal dirty laundry of the DNC was likely miles worse than any traceable hack lead. That's why Obama didn't care. In order to bust Russia he would have had to take down the entire DNC and half the media.
uhhhhh, very flimsy....

1. have you forgotten all the hacked emails were RELEASED ALREADY on to wikileaks...? What's left to hide?

2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.

Hahahaa...good point, the emails were released and these goofballs are saying they don't know if the servers were hacked because they didn't looks at the servers. As if the emails could've came from anywhere EXCEPT the goddam servers!!

These guys are a hoot!

Which idiots are saying the emails leaked themselves without a hack? That's not possible. It IS possible and HIGHLY LIKELY THO -- that those servers were compromised MORE THAN ONCE by more than one bad actor.. And the PROFESSIONALS don't make it easy to trace their work. AND a full blown SuperPower Intel Group would NOT compromise their sources and methods and toss them under the bus just to release stuff to the press.

So Cozy Bear and Shitty Bear and all that nonsense would NOT BE agents of the Russian Govt. Because Intel Agencies don't EXPOSE themselves that way...

Lol whut?
 
2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.

Everything the DNC ALLOWED to be released went to the FBI. Not a full forensics job. DNC PAID for that report. So the DNC decided how much to release. THEY controlled the story..

NO private company has the abilities of a multi-billion-$$$$ GOVT counter cyber group with intel connections, satellites, covert recording of Russian intelligence, etc... Especially one that just got on it's feet 2 or 3 years before the event took place..
This company is one of the most respected cyber security annalists in the Nation.

What's a full forensic job?

HOW DO YOU KNOW the DNC only allowed the expert cyber security company to not release to the FBI everything they had on the breac, held back anything at all, on the server breach? reputable LINK?

WHAT ARE YOU IMPLYING? Are you saying the Russians did NOT try to interfere with this election? (And the German elections, and the French elections, and the British elections etc?)

The DNC hack and the PODESTA hack was just a drop in the bucket of what the Russians did to influence this elect... the emails hacked was what they used FOR EVERYTHING else that they did, but the everything else that they did IS WHAT AFFECTED the results of this election....the tens of thousands of trolls they hired and bots they used to spread FAKE STORIES that they made up about the wikileaks emails, like Hillary had Parkinson's and was dying, and Pizzagate, and a thousand other fake analysis stories that they spread to millions through their intricate bot program on facebook and other social media, and their propaganda news outlets like the RT that get picked up by the briebarts and infowars and drudges and even Fox news and ALL right wing media,

and of course picked up by the candidate Trump before the articles and stories even have time to spread with Trump pushing the propaganda through his tweets and at his rallies... the last 30 days before the election Trump made 164 mentions of wikileaks /DNC/Podesta emails. A HUNDRED AND SIXTY FOUR mentions in 30 days....Let alone the hacks of Rubio and Lindsey and other candidates, and the voter registration files, which they are now finding out some of the voters may have been focused on in specific regions with ads and fake stories on their social media accounts, all initiated by the Russians and Russian moles living here...

If not the Russians.... with that kind of huge operation, then who was it? The RNC? The Trump Campaign? The Sanders campaign? Karl Rove or Peter Smith?

(And please don't even think of bringing up Seth Rich bull crap.... First off, the guy was an honest ace and NOT a thief as the right wingers pushing that bull crud by saying he was the one who stole the emails as an inside job, (and how could he have gotten to Podesta's?)and second he could NOT have done all of the things I mentioned above that the investigations are finding alone, as a disgruntled Sanders supporter if you follow the right wing faux STORY on this....)

It ain't no 400lb guy in momma's basement, ONLY A FOOL like Trump, could come up with that bull crap and only Trumbots would buy it!
 
Last edited:

Those are CNN stories. Read them carefully. Rubio NEVER is quoted with any evidence that Russians hacked his account other than having a Russian IP address.

I can get a fixed Russian IP Address for $19 a month.... It's not EVIDENCE...

CNN is entirely into writing fiction now.

Dude... they have been directly quoted. It has nothing to do with CNN putting a spin on it. do a Google search and find the hundreds of sources about them.

Go back to the Rubio QUOTES.. Show me anything OTHER than a IP address that was a sign of Russian hacking.

Be honest, do you really think a U.S. Representative would mention being hacked in a Congressional hearing based SOLELY on an IP address? Come on man... you know there is more evidence to it than that, but obviously he can't go into detail about Top Secret information in a public hearing.
 
2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.

Everything the DNC ALLOWED to be released went to the FBI. Not a full forensics job. DNC PAID for that report. So the DNC decided how much to release. THEY controlled the story..

NO private company has the abilities of a multi-billion-$$$$ GOVT counter cyber group with intel connections, satellites, covert recording of Russian intelligence, etc... Especially one that just got on it's feet 2 or 3 years before the event took place..
This company is one of the most respected cyber security annalists in the Nation.

What's a full forensic job?

HOW DO YOU KNOW the DNC only allowed the expert cyber security company held back anything at all, on the server breach? reputable LINK?

WHAT ARE YOU IMPLYING? Are you saying the Russians did NOT try to interfere with this election? (And the German elections, and the French elections, and the British elections etc?)

The DNC hack and the PODESTA hack was just a drop in the bucket of what the Russians did to influence this elect... the emails hacked was what they used FOR EVERYTHING else that they did, but the everything else that they did IS WHAT AFFECTED the results of this election....the tens of thousands of trolls they hired and bots they used to spread FAKE STORIES that they made up about the wikileaks emails, like Hillary had Parkinson's and was dying, and Pizzagate, and a thousand other fake analysis stories that they spread to millions through their intricate bot program on facebook and other social media, and their propaganda news outlets like the RT that get picked up by the briebarts and infowars and drudges and even Fox news and ALL right wing media,

and of course picked up by the candidate Trump before the articles and stories even have time to spread with Trump pushing the propaganda through his tweets and at his rallies... the last 30 days before the election Trump made 164 mentions of wikileaks /DNC/Podesta emails. A HUNDRED AND SIXTY FOUR mentions in 30 days....Let alone the hacks of Rubio and Lindsey and other candidates, and the voter registration files, which they are now finding out some of the voters may have been focused on in specific regions with ads and fake stories on their social media accounts, all initiated by the Russians and Russian moles living here...

If not the Russians.... with that kind of huge operation, then who was it? The RNC? The Trump Campaign? The Sanders campaign? Karl Rove or Peter Smith?

(And please don't even think of bringing up Seth Rich bull crap.... First off, the guy was an honest ace and NOT a thief as the right wingers pushing that bull crud by saying he was the one who stole the emails as an inside job, (and how could he have gotten to Podesta's?)and second he could NOT have done all of the things I mentioned above that the investigations are finding alone, as a disgruntled Sanders supporter if you follow the right wing faux STORY on this....)

It ain't no 400lb guy in momma's basement, ONLY A FOOL like Trump, could come up with that bull crap and only Trumbots would buy it!

This post fucking KILLS! They pretend that unless thousands of people come forward saying they were fooled then ALL the things Russia did affected no one no where. Then why did they create fake news? For NO EFFECT?

Whow does anything for no reason? But it's easy to fool people but it's hard as hell to get them to admit they were fooled.
 
2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.

Everything the DNC ALLOWED to be released went to the FBI. Not a full forensics job. DNC PAID for that report. So the DNC decided how much to release. THEY controlled the story..

NO private company has the abilities of a multi-billion-$$$$ GOVT counter cyber group with intel connections, satellites, covert recording of Russian intelligence, etc... Especially one that just got on it's feet 2 or 3 years before the event took place..
This company is one of the most respected cyber security annalists in the Nation.

What's a full forensic job?

HOW DO YOU KNOW the DNC only allowed the expert cyber security company held back anything at all, on the server breach? reputable LINK?

WHAT ARE YOU IMPLYING? Are you saying the Russians did NOT try to interfere with this election? (And the German elections, and the French elections, and the British elections etc?)

The DNC hack and the PODESTA hack was just a drop in the bucket of what the Russians did to influence this elect... the emails hacked was what they used FOR EVERYTHING else that they did, but the everything else that they did IS WHAT AFFECTED the results of this election....the tens of thousands of trolls they hired and bots they used to spread FAKE STORIES that they made up about the wikileaks emails, like Hillary had Parkinson's and was dying, and Pizzagate, and a thousand other fake analysis stories that they spread to millions through their intricate bot program on facebook and other social media, and their propaganda news outlets like the RT that get picked up by the briebarts and infowars and drudges and even Fox news and ALL right wing media,

and of course picked up by the candidate Trump before the articles and stories even have time to spread with Trump pushing the propaganda through his tweets and at his rallies... the last 30 days before the election Trump made 164 mentions of wikileaks /DNC/Podesta emails. A HUNDRED AND SIXTY FOUR mentions in 30 days....Let alone the hacks of Rubio and Lindsey and other candidates, and the voter registration files, which they are now finding out some of the voters may have been focused on in specific regions with ads and fake stories on their social media accounts, all initiated by the Russians and Russian moles living here...

If not the Russians.... with that kind of huge operation, then who was it? The RNC? The Trump Campaign? The Sanders campaign? Karl Rove or Peter Smith?

(And please don't even think of bringing up Seth Rich bull crap.... First off, the guy was an honest ace and NOT a thief as the right wingers pushing that bull crud by saying he was the one who stole the emails as an inside job, (and how could he have gotten to Podesta's?)and second he could NOT have done all of the things I mentioned above that the investigations are finding alone, as a disgruntled Sanders supporter if you follow the right wing faux STORY on this....)

It ain't no 400lb guy in momma's basement, ONLY A FOOL like Trump, could come up with that bull crap and only Trumbots would buy it!

This post fucking KILLS! They pretend that unless thousands of people come forward saying they were fooled then ALL the things Russia did affected no one no where. Then why did they create fake news? For NO EFFECT?

Whow does anything for no reason? But it's easy to fool people but it's hard as hell to get them to admit they were fooled.


Lord, the number of fake news stories that were posted on this forum was ridiculous.

And the threads that were posted each day that new Wikileaks were released about how the leak was going to bury Clinton... but then after the election they all swear the leaks didn't affect the election.
 
2. everything from the server concerning the leaks that the private investigative firm came to their conclusions on...was GIVEN to the FBI to examine.

Everything the DNC ALLOWED to be released went to the FBI. Not a full forensics job. DNC PAID for that report. So the DNC decided how much to release. THEY controlled the story..

NO private company has the abilities of a multi-billion-$$$$ GOVT counter cyber group with intel connections, satellites, covert recording of Russian intelligence, etc... Especially one that just got on it's feet 2 or 3 years before the event took place..
This company is one of the most respected cyber security annalists in the Nation.

What's a full forensic job?

HOW DO YOU KNOW the DNC only allowed the expert cyber security company to not release to the FBI everything they had on the breac, held back anything at all, on the server breach? reputable LINK?

WHAT ARE YOU IMPLYING? Are you saying the Russians did NOT try to interfere with this election? (And the German elections, and the French elections, and the British elections etc?)

The DNC hack and the PODESTA hack was just a drop in the bucket of what the Russians did to influence this elect... the emails hacked was what they used FOR EVERYTHING else that they did, but the everything else that they did IS WHAT AFFECTED the results of this election....the tens of thousands of trolls they hired and bots they used to spread FAKE STORIES that they made up about the wikileaks emails, like Hillary had Parkinson's and was dying, and Pizzagate, and a thousand other fake analysis stories that they spread to millions through their intricate bot program on facebook and other social media, and their propaganda news outlets like the RT that get picked up by the briebarts and infowars and drudges and even Fox news and ALL right wing media,

and of course picked up by the candidate Trump before the articles and stories even have time to spread with Trump pushing the propaganda through his tweets and at his rallies... the last 30 days before the election Trump made 164 mentions of wikileaks /DNC/Podesta emails. A HUNDRED AND SIXTY FOUR mentions in 30 days....Let alone the hacks of Rubio and Lindsey and other candidates, and the voter registration files, which they are now finding out some of the voters may have been focused on in specific regions with ads and fake stories on their social media accounts, all initiated by the Russians and Russian moles living here...

If not the Russians.... with that kind of huge operation, then who was it? The RNC? The Trump Campaign? The Sanders campaign? Karl Rove or Peter Smith?

(And please don't even think of bringing up Seth Rich bull crap.... First off, the guy was an honest ace and NOT a thief as the right wingers pushing that bull crud by saying he was the one who stole the emails as an inside job, (and how could he have gotten to Podesta's?)and second he could NOT have done all of the things I mentioned above that the investigations are finding alone, as a disgruntled Sanders supporter if you follow the right wing faux STORY on this....)

It ain't no 400lb guy in momma's basement, ONLY A FOOL like Trump, could come up with that bull crap and only Trumbots would buy it!
...and yet your Messiah did nothing about it.

Do you still love him unconditionally?
 
Poor righties. Now they have to defend Trump saying he talked tough to Putin while also saying there is nothing to confront Putin over.

They have to defend Putin and Trump who says they didn't hack but also they did hack..while also saying the Intel agencies don't know Russia hacked.

Basically they have to say water is wet and so what if it's dry!

Well -- since not ONE FEDERAL Counter Cyber person EVER saw or touched the DNC server --- there is NO PROOF. Which is what I've been telling y'all all along. If it was a fucking international incidence -- that server and Podesta's phone should have been BAGGED AND TAGGED and taken "into evidence"...

But it didn't happen. Did it??

Poor righties. Now they have to defend Trump saying he talked tough to Putin while also saying there is nothing to confront Putin over.

They have to defend Putin and Trump who says they didn't hack but also they did hack..while also saying the Intel agencies don't know Russia hacked.

Basically they have to say water is wet and so what if it's dry!

Well -- since not ONE FEDERAL Counter Cyber person EVER saw or touched the DNC server --- there is NO PROOF. Which is what I've been telling y'all all along. If it was a fucking international incidence -- that server and Podesta's phone should have been BAGGED AND TAGGED and taken "into evidence"...

But it didn't happen. Did it??
Of course not because the internal dirty laundry of the DNC was likely miles worse than any traceable hack lead. That's why Obama didn't care. In order to bust Russia he would have had to take down the entire DNC and half the media.

The fact that the DNC server has not been analyzed is the proverbial elephant in the room....yet the Left and their media ignore this.

Clearly something stinks big time.

This fact means our government is terribly corrupt and actively covering up something.

....but that F-ing Trump...he colluded with Russia to steal the election...:uhoh3::uhoh3::uhoh3::uhoh3::uhoh3:
 

Forum List

Back
Top