Trump smears E. Jean Carroll on social media while sitting in courtroom

[john doe 101]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

You have absolutely no idea how things work. The judge is not going to be disbarred nor should he.

You do realize trump confused a pic of E Jean Carrol with his own ex-wife.

 

[otto105]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

Fuckup

The second defamation trial isn't a redo of the first trial where the former 1-term was found guilty.

This is about continued defaming of her.

 

[Arlette]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

No relitigation. That's what the judge said. Trump can't follow simple orders.

 

[JoeB131]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

Trump should have did that in the first trial. That ship has sailed.

This trial is only about whether he defamed her in subsequent comments, which he clearly had.


Not sure why you think the guy who brags about "Grabbing women by the pussy" wouldn't do exactly what he is accused of.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Nobody has given anyone a "pass". You kids have never managed to back up any of your made up accusations.

It's like the whole voter fraud thing all over again, what was it Rudy said?

Oh yeah, "we have lots of accusations, we just don't have any evidence".

Why don’t you believe woman?

 

[JoeB131]

Why did leftists give Biden a pass for fingering Reade?

Because she wasn't credible. She worked in Biden's office for three months before she was fired. Nearly everyone who remembered her remembered she was kind of useless.

Her story also didn't make any sense. He fingered her inside a busy hallway that dozens people people walk through at any given time?

On top of that, this woman has operated under at least five different names and has been charged with various counts of fraud, including presenting herself as an expert witness when she didn't have the academic credentials

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I wonder how many of these Trump Humpers would feel that way, if that were their mother, sister, daughter, cousin, etc.

Maga regard for women really shines through on this thread.
Who could believe that the pussy grabber could not assaul a woman.

 

[DGS49]

Again, nobody with a three digit IQ believes that Donald Trump RAPED this women (forcibly had sexual intercourse) in that department store fitting room. I personally doubt that he even touched her, but this is Manhattan we are talking about and reality often loses out to fantasy.

When all the appeals have played out, there will be an appellate court that will, one way or another, articulate the point that HE never did what SHE claimed he did.

This is why he continues to state that she is a liar...she is a liar. That ain't defamation if it's true.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yuck

View attachment 888917

The orange retard thought he was married to that.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Again, nobody with a three digit IQ believes that Donald Trump RAPED this women (forcibly had sexual intercourse) in that department store fitting room. I personally doubt that he even touched her, but this is Manhattan we are talking about and reality often loses out to fantasy.

When all the appeals have played out, there will be an appellate court that will, one way or another, articulate the point that HE never did what SHE claimed he did.

This is why he continues to state that she is a liar...she is a liar. That ain't defamation if it's true.

Based on what? We know he is a liar.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Again, nobody with a three digit IQ believes that Donald Trump RAPED this women (forcibly had sexual intercourse) in that department store fitting room. I personally doubt that he even touched her, but this is Manhattan we are talking about and reality often loses out to fantasy.

When all the appeals have played out, there will be an appellate court that will, one way or another, articulate the point that HE never did what SHE claimed he did.

This is why he continues to state that she is a liar...she is a liar. That ain't defamation if it's true.

He is on record as forcing himself on women.
Why is it hard to believe ?

 

[JoeB131]

Again, nobody with a three digit IQ believes that Donald Trump RAPED this women (forcibly had sexual intercourse) in that department store fitting room. I personally doubt that he even touched her, but this is Manhattan we are talking about and reality often loses out to fantasy.

When all the appeals have played out, there will be an appellate court that will, one way or another, articulate the point that HE never did what SHE claimed he did.

This is why he continues to state that she is a liar...she is a liar. That ain't defamation if it's true.

Actually, Trump doesn't have grounds for appeal because he never contested the facts in court.

He arrogantly assumed no one would take her seriously, and barely mounted a defense in court.

 

[d0gbreath]

Yuck

View attachment 888917

She looked like this back then:

 

[Blaster]

She looked like this back then:

View attachment 889226

Still yuck.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Keep in mind that TRUTH is an effective defense to a defamation charge.

She accused him of RAPING her. He called her a liar.

A MANHATTAN jury found that he was guilty of "sexual assault," which covers everything from an inadvertent feel to rape. The Judge was quoted falsely claiming that Trump was found to have raped the woman - for which he should be disbarred.

Anyway, if Trump is PERMITTED (in a Manhattan courtroom) to prove that he did not RAPE her, he could prevail. But it's a close case, where the judge could deny him the right to contest the facts because he was found guilty in a criminal trial.

No rational human believes that Donald Trump forcibly raped this unattractive woman in the dressing room of a department store. It doesn't pass the laugh test.

he would never touch anything like that.........she is a christine ford liar

 

[Blaster]

he would never touch anything like that.........she is a christine ford liar

She could never prove she had an encounter with him but the jury believed her lies.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

She looked like this back then:

View attachment 889226

ummmmmm....no....trump wouldn't do that in a fucking mall............LOLOLOLOLOL

 

[Missourian]

Yuck

View attachment 888917

That may be the biggest forehead I've ever seen on a woman. Washing that face is an all day job.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

She could never prove she had an encounter with him but the jury believed her lies.

look where it is at....lol

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

She could never prove she had an encounter with him but the jury believed her lies.

in a mall of all...............LOLOLOL...what horse shit........fun to watch but so criminal