Trump still thinks Central Park 5 are guilty

[Correll]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

Go on then.

 

[Correll]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

1. Sure it does. If you are "only holding down the legs", you are not leaving behind dna.

2. Penetration does not always lead to leaving dna behind.

3. Multiple samples could interfere with each other.

4. Your pretense otherwise, is the lie.

 

[Jitss617]

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

DNA was primitive in 1989,, question why do you want rapist in the black community, do they deserve to live protected? Answer that question

DNA had been in use for a few years. You are just pissed because it disproves your loony, racist theory.

Didn’t disprove, it was primitive in 1989,, if this happened today they would have collected everything for test. 1989 cops had a different view in dna, they thought it was only in her, now we can get it from anything.

 

[Jitss617]

We have to stop allowing democrats to release rapist in the black community

 

[Faun]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

Not primitive enough it couldn't identify Matias Reyes, the actual rapist.

 

[Faun]

Whites Dems can’t beat and rape blacks any more so
They pay blacks to do the work of the kkk. Sick

Slavery, Jim Crow.. = Democrats

republicans ended it. So now to make blacks pay democrats are releasing criminals back in the community

That was then. Today they are Republicans.

All
Cries of racial oppression only comes from towns run by democrats

The racist conservative south is now a Republican stronghold. Now ya know, comrade.

 

[Jitss617]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

Not primitive enough it couldn't identify Matias Reyes, the actual rapist.

What’s your point? DNA was primitive..

Can you answer my question about why you want black rapist in the community?

 

[Faun]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

Her fave was bashed in at the end.. the last few bashed her head in, blood leaks out. Why do you defend this ? Because you want blacks to rape?

Your idiocy is not matched by their claims.

Just a facts ,


The police also had incriminating testimony from friends and acquaintances of the defendants.

— Dennis Commedo, one of the boys who was part of the larger group, told the police that, when he ran into Richardson in the park that night, he’d said, “We just raped somebody.”

— Wise told a friend’s sister, Melody Jackson, that he didn’t rape the jogger; he “only held her legs down while Kevin (Richardson) f—ed her.” Jackson volunteered this information to the police, thinking it would help Wise.

— Two of Wise’s friends said that, the next day, he told them, “You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night. That was us!”

— Another boy arrested for the attacks, but not the rape, told the detectives on videotape that he overheard Santana and a friend laughing in the park about how they’d “made a woman bleed.”

The defendants also knew facts about the attack that only someone who had been there could possibly know. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

Wise told the detective interviewing him that someone he thought was named “Rudy” had stolen the jogger’s Walkman. The officer’s notes state: “persons present when girl raped. … Rudy –- played with tits/took walkman.”

At that point, the jogger was still in a coma. Police investigators had no way of knowing that she’d been carrying a Walkman. Thirteen years later, the sixth rapist, Matias Reyes — the only rapist, according to Hollywood and former District Attorney Robert Morgenthau — told police that in addition to raping the jogger, he’d stolen her Walkman.

Imbecile, you idiotically claimed they struck her in her head at the end of the rape. But none of them said that. The ones who said she was struck in the head with a rock or a brick said o e of them hit her when she began screaming for help when they started ripping off her clothes.

She was covered in blood. I posted her blood-soaked shirt. How did none of the purported rapists who were caught that night not have any of her blood on them?

 

[Faun]

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

Making shit up again
Both boys claimed the rape happened near the Reservoir which was nowhere close to the actual site

Two took them right to the location,, did they do to?

The sexual deviate who copped to the rape in the joint was in the same unit as the CP5. He was able to get details about the crime from the actual perps

And Reyes was able to get his DNA into Meili's cervix from them too, huh?

 

[Faun]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

Great, name them...

 

[Correll]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

No one is doubting that the rapist raped the woman. The question is, why do you believe him when he claims to have been alone?


And lack of dna evidence does not prove lack fo involvement. That is the type of lie that only someone actively trying to protect rapists would say.

 

[Correll]

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

DNA was primitive in 1989,, question why do you want rapist in the black community, do they deserve to live protected? Answer that question

DNA had been in use for a few years. You are just pissed because it disproves your loony, racist theory.

That you would use the Race Card on this, shows that you are a completely soulless monster.

 

[Faun]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

 

[Correll]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

Go on then.

1. As the one said, he only held her legs down, while the other(s) raped the woman.


That would make him a rapist while not leaving behind any dna.


That the one rapist said that that is what he did, was mentioned several times here in this thread, today.


Are you really so...what every you are, that you could read that multiple times today, and not realize that that would be ONE way for a rapist to rape a woman and not leave dna?

Admit that one, and I will be happy to explain to you, another equally easy and obvious way, that you should already be aware of, unless your brain is completely broken.

 

[The Purge]

And in a related theme, Blow Job Clinton is still impeached. AND a rapist, and our Manchurian muslim, Surrender Monkey still gave Iran $150 BILLION to promote their terrorism around the world, that he didn't have to.....which has more effect on the world?

A rapist? Where were the indictments? The convictions? Oh, wait....you are lying again.

Another lying leftist....you people certainly think we on the right are DUMBER Zthan you asswipes!

www.rkmbs.com
www.rkmbs.com/ubbthreads.php/ubb/printthread/Board/9/main/66142/type/thread
Bill Clinton was forced by his guilt to pay $850,00 in damages to Paula Jones. And if I recall, another $80,000 fine to the American Bar Association, along with revocation of his law license.....

 

[Correll]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

 

[Faun]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

 

[Correll]

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

 

[Jitss617]

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

Her fave was bashed in at the end.. the last few bashed her head in, blood leaks out. Why do you defend this ? Because you want blacks to rape?

Your idiocy is not matched by their claims.

Just a facts ,


The police also had incriminating testimony from friends and acquaintances of the defendants.

— Dennis Commedo, one of the boys who was part of the larger group, told the police that, when he ran into Richardson in the park that night, he’d said, “We just raped somebody.”

— Wise told a friend’s sister, Melody Jackson, that he didn’t rape the jogger; he “only held her legs down while Kevin (Richardson) f—ed her.” Jackson volunteered this information to the police, thinking it would help Wise.

— Two of Wise’s friends said that, the next day, he told them, “You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night. That was us!”

— Another boy arrested for the attacks, but not the rape, told the detectives on videotape that he overheard Santana and a friend laughing in the park about how they’d “made a woman bleed.”

The defendants also knew facts about the attack that only someone who had been there could possibly know. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

Wise told the detective interviewing him that someone he thought was named “Rudy” had stolen the jogger’s Walkman. The officer’s notes state: “persons present when girl raped. … Rudy –- played with tits/took walkman.”

At that point, the jogger was still in a coma. Police investigators had no way of knowing that she’d been carrying a Walkman. Thirteen years later, the sixth rapist, Matias Reyes — the only rapist, according to Hollywood and former District Attorney Robert Morgenthau — told police that in addition to raping the jogger, he’d stolen her Walkman.

Imbecile, you idiotically claimed they struck her in her head at the end of the rape. But none of them said that. The ones who said she was struck in the head with a rock or a brick said o e of them hit her when she began screaming for help when they started ripping off her clothes.

She was covered in blood. I posted her blood-soaked shirt. How did none of the purported rapists who were caught that night not have any of her blood on them?

Did they rape her head yes or no? You are one racist bastard!