Trump still thinks Central Park 5 are guilty

[Jitss617]

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

Making shit up again
Both boys claimed the rape happened near the Reservoir which was nowhere close to the actual site

Two took them right to the location,, did they do to?

The sexual deviate who copped to the rape in the joint was in the same unit as the CP5. He was able to get details about the crime from the actual perps

And Reyes was able to get his DBA into Meili's cervix from them too, huh?

Huh

 

[hjmick]

We have to stop allowing democrats to release rapist in the black community

In which community would you like them to release rapists?

 

[Faun]

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

 

[Faun]

How did they rape her, or even hold her down, without getting her blood on themselves?

Her fave was bashed in at the end.. the last few bashed her head in, blood leaks out. Why do you defend this ? Because you want blacks to rape?

Your idiocy is not matched by their claims.

Just a facts ,


The police also had incriminating testimony from friends and acquaintances of the defendants.

— Dennis Commedo, one of the boys who was part of the larger group, told the police that, when he ran into Richardson in the park that night, he’d said, “We just raped somebody.”

— Wise told a friend’s sister, Melody Jackson, that he didn’t rape the jogger; he “only held her legs down while Kevin (Richardson) f—ed her.” Jackson volunteered this information to the police, thinking it would help Wise.

— Two of Wise’s friends said that, the next day, he told them, “You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night. That was us!”

— Another boy arrested for the attacks, but not the rape, told the detectives on videotape that he overheard Santana and a friend laughing in the park about how they’d “made a woman bleed.”

The defendants also knew facts about the attack that only someone who had been there could possibly know. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

Wise told the detective interviewing him that someone he thought was named “Rudy” had stolen the jogger’s Walkman. The officer’s notes state: “persons present when girl raped. … Rudy –- played with tits/took walkman.”

At that point, the jogger was still in a coma. Police investigators had no way of knowing that she’d been carrying a Walkman. Thirteen years later, the sixth rapist, Matias Reyes — the only rapist, according to Hollywood and former District Attorney Robert Morgenthau — told police that in addition to raping the jogger, he’d stolen her Walkman.

Imbecile, you idiotically claimed they struck her in her head at the end of the rape. But none of them said that. The ones who said she was struck in the head with a rock or a brick said o e of them hit her when she began screaming for help when they started ripping off her clothes.

She was covered in blood. I posted her blood-soaked shirt. How did none of the purported rapists who were caught that night not have any of her blood on them?

Did they rape her head yes or no? You are one racist bastard!

The state of New York says they didn't rape her at all.

 

[Polishprince]

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

What kind of racist does that make ultraliberal New York DA Robert Morganthau for allowing this prosecution? What kind of incompetent does this make the CP5's attorneys, if this is so obvious?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

How did these children manage to gang rape this woman without leaving any dna at the crime scene. 5 of them supposedly present and no dna. How did they manage that ?

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

No one is doubting that the rapist raped the woman. The question is, why do you believe him when he claims to have been alone?


And lack of dna evidence does not prove lack fo involvement. That is the type of lie that only someone actively trying to protect rapists would say.

Well to all intents and purposes it does prove a lack of involvement. Without it you have no proof. No physical evidence, no eye witnesses, no fingerprints, no videos - nothing.

 

[Correll]

I can imagine a number of ways. Easily. With seconds of thought.

your pretense otherwise, is not credible.

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

Say it clearly, so that we can laugh at you.


You are stating the every time you hit someone in the head with a brick, you will get significant blood on yourself.


Please state that clearly so we can laugh at you.

 

[Polishprince]

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

No one is doubting that the rapist raped the woman. The question is, why do you believe him when he claims to have been alone?


And lack of dna evidence does not prove lack fo involvement. That is the type of lie that only someone actively trying to protect rapists would say.

Well to all intents and purposes it does prove a lack of involvement. Without it you have no proof. No physical evidence, no eye witnesses, no fingerprints, no videos - nothing.

There was proof enough to convince the Ultraliberal Manhattan DA's office to bring charges and for 12 angry men from the most liberal island in America to find them to be guilty as an MF'er.

 

[Correll]

One of them stated that he only felt up her tits, while the others raped her. Another stated that he only helped hold down her legs while the others raped her.


Do you understand how that would make them rapists, while not leaving behind dna?

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

No one is doubting that the rapist raped the woman. The question is, why do you believe him when he claims to have been alone?


And lack of dna evidence does not prove lack fo involvement. That is the type of lie that only someone actively trying to protect rapists would say.

Well to all intents and purposes it does prove a lack of involvement. Without it you have no proof. No physical evidence, no eye witnesses, no fingerprints, no videos - nothing.

No, it does not. Especially when you have suspects saying shit like, "I just held her legs" and " I just felt her tits".


That you can seriously claim that lack of dna means it proves a lack of involvement, you are either delusional or lying.

Query: Maybe you will answer this. None of the other libs will.



You are walking in the park one night, and happen upon a rape taking place.


Do you,

a. Say to yourself, "wow, nice tits. This is a great chance to feel them, while the woman is distracted with being raped" and then grope her?


or


b. other.?



Because scenario A, is the DEFENSE of one of your heroes in this story.

 

[Faun]

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

What kind of racist does that make ultraliberal New York DA Robert Morganthau for allowing this prosecution? What kind of incompetent does this make the CP5's attorneys, if this is so obvious?

Um, that's why they were awarded 40+ million.

 

[Polishprince]

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

What kind of racist does that make ultraliberal New York DA Robert Morganthau for allowing this prosecution? What kind of incompetent does this make the CP5's attorneys, if this is so obvious?

Um, that's why they were awarded 40+ million.

They were awarded taxpayer money by ultraliberals Warren Wilhelm and Andrew "Fredo" Cuomo, not by a court or any impartial, objective judge.

 

[Faun]

At least one of them said she was covered in blood. He also said at least 3 of them physically raped her. How does only climb onto a bloody woman without getting blood on themselves?

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

Say it clearly, so that we can laugh at you.


You are stating the every time you hit someone in the head with a brick, you will get significant blood on yourself.


Please state that clearly so we can laugh at you.

Dumbfuck... a brick and barehanded. The only way you couldn't get blood on yourself would be if the brick didn't break skin. And whoever beat her up, hit her hard enough in the head to blow out an eyeball.

 

[Faun]

It doesnt explain the lack of any dna on her or any traces on them. If they were holding her down while another one was raping her then his dna would be present. It wasnt. The only dna was that of the rapist. You are spouting this shite because you are a trumptard and these kids are black.
All you have is forced confessions and a big bag of lies.

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

No one is doubting that the rapist raped the woman. The question is, why do you believe him when he claims to have been alone?


And lack of dna evidence does not prove lack fo involvement. That is the type of lie that only someone actively trying to protect rapists would say.

Well to all intents and purposes it does prove a lack of involvement. Without it you have no proof. No physical evidence, no eye witnesses, no fingerprints, no videos - nothing.

No, it does not. Especially when you have suspects saying shit like, "I just held her legs" and " I just felt her tits".


That you can seriously claim that lack of dna means it proves a lack of involvement, you are either delusional or lying.

Query: Maybe you will answer this. None of the other libs will.



You are walking in the park one night, and happen upon a rape taking place.


Do you,

a. Say to yourself, "wow, nice tits. This is a great chance to feel them, while the woman is distracted with being raped" and then grope her?


or


b. other.?



Because scenario A, is the DEFENSE of one of your heroes in this story.

Who wasn't there.

 

[Polishprince]

1. Some of them could have raped her, before she was covered in blood.

2. Some of them were arrested later. They could have showered or gotten rid of blood stained clothing.

3. Dark clothing might have hidden the evidence and the cops, might have failed to note and take the evidence.

4. Some of the ones that penetrated her, might have gotten away, while we caught the stupid ones that bragged to their friends.


This is where you apologize for being you.

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

Say it clearly, so that we can laugh at you.


You are stating the every time you hit someone in the head with a brick, you will get significant blood on yourself.


Please state that clearly so we can laugh at you.

Dumbfuck... a brick and barehanded. The only way you couldn't get blood on yourself would be if the brick didn't break skin. And whoever beat her up, hit her hard enough in the head to blow out an eyeball.

Exactly. It was a violent attack. And that's why neighborhood activists like Donald J. Trump was interested in fingering the REAL perpetrators to get them off the street , regardless of what race of mankind they were representing with their actions.

Remember, Trump's Old Lady and children lived in this hood, Central Park is virtually right outside his door.

 

[Polishprince]

The DNA was primitive in 1989 just facts.. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

No one is doubting that the rapist raped the woman. The question is, why do you believe him when he claims to have been alone?


And lack of dna evidence does not prove lack fo involvement. That is the type of lie that only someone actively trying to protect rapists would say.

Well to all intents and purposes it does prove a lack of involvement. Without it you have no proof. No physical evidence, no eye witnesses, no fingerprints, no videos - nothing.

No, it does not. Especially when you have suspects saying shit like, "I just held her legs" and " I just felt her tits".


That you can seriously claim that lack of dna means it proves a lack of involvement, you are either delusional or lying.

Query: Maybe you will answer this. None of the other libs will.



You are walking in the park one night, and happen upon a rape taking place.


Do you,

a. Say to yourself, "wow, nice tits. This is a great chance to feel them, while the woman is distracted with being raped" and then grope her?


or


b. other.?



Because scenario A, is the DEFENSE of one of your heroes in this story.

Who wasn't there.

The defendant admitted that he was there. He was just really fortunate that he met a sucker in the joint willing to take the rap for this vicious attack. It made him literally millions of dollars.

 

[Jitss617]

Her fave was bashed in at the end.. the last few bashed her head in, blood leaks out. Why do you defend this ? Because you want blacks to rape?

Your idiocy is not matched by their claims.

Just a facts ,


The police also had incriminating testimony from friends and acquaintances of the defendants.

— Dennis Commedo, one of the boys who was part of the larger group, told the police that, when he ran into Richardson in the park that night, he’d said, “We just raped somebody.”

— Wise told a friend’s sister, Melody Jackson, that he didn’t rape the jogger; he “only held her legs down while Kevin (Richardson) f—ed her.” Jackson volunteered this information to the police, thinking it would help Wise.

— Two of Wise’s friends said that, the next day, he told them, “You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night. That was us!”

— Another boy arrested for the attacks, but not the rape, told the detectives on videotape that he overheard Santana and a friend laughing in the park about how they’d “made a woman bleed.”

The defendants also knew facts about the attack that only someone who had been there could possibly know. Two of the boys, Santana and Richardson, independently pointed out the exact location where the rape had occurred.

Wise told the detective interviewing him that someone he thought was named “Rudy” had stolen the jogger’s Walkman. The officer’s notes state: “persons present when girl raped. … Rudy –- played with tits/took walkman.”

At that point, the jogger was still in a coma. Police investigators had no way of knowing that she’d been carrying a Walkman. Thirteen years later, the sixth rapist, Matias Reyes — the only rapist, according to Hollywood and former District Attorney Robert Morgenthau — told police that in addition to raping the jogger, he’d stolen her Walkman.

Imbecile, you idiotically claimed they struck her in her head at the end of the rape. But none of them said that. The ones who said she was struck in the head with a rock or a brick said o e of them hit her when she began screaming for help when they started ripping off her clothes.

She was covered in blood. I posted her blood-soaked shirt. How did none of the purported rapists who were caught that night not have any of her blood on them?

Did they rape her head yes or no? You are one racist bastard!

The state of New York says they didn't rape her at all.

No left wing democrats that want rapist in black neighborhoods said that.. and that’s why democrats are losing the vote

 

[rightwinger]

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

Say it clearly, so that we can laugh at you.


You are stating the every time you hit someone in the head with a brick, you will get significant blood on yourself.


Please state that clearly so we can laugh at you.

Dumbfuck... a brick and barehanded. The only way you couldn't get blood on yourself would be if the brick didn't break skin. And whoever beat her up, hit her hard enough in the head to blow out an eyeball.

Exactly. It was a violent attack. And that's why neighborhood activists like Donald J. Trump was interested in fingering the REAL perpetrators to get them off the street , regardless of what race of mankind they were representing with their actions.

Remember, Trump's Old Lady and children lived in this hood, Central Park is virtually right outside his door.

Which Old Lady?
Do you have any idea how big Central Park is?

 

[Faun]

Three of them were arrested shortly after Meili was raped. One of them was identified as the one striking her in the head with a rock or brick. How do you hit some in the head with a rock or a brick twice, while holding it, and manage to get no blood on yourself? And then continue kneeling by her head as blood pours out onto the ground as others proceed to rape her and get none of it on you?

Your nonsense is so delusional, you render yourself not believable.

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

Say it clearly, so that we can laugh at you.


You are stating the every time you hit someone in the head with a brick, you will get significant blood on yourself.


Please state that clearly so we can laugh at you.

Dumbfuck... a brick and barehanded. The only way you couldn't get blood on yourself would be if the brick didn't break skin. And whoever beat her up, hit her hard enough in the head to blow out an eyeball.

Exactly. It was a violent attack. And that's why neighborhood activists like Donald J. Trump was interested in fingering the REAL perpetrators to get them off the street , regardless of what race of mankind they were representing with their actions.

Remember, Trump's Old Lady and children lived in this hood, Central Park is virtually right outside his door.

Impeached Trump did not live in their "hood," ya dumbfuck. You have no clue how big Centeal Park is, do ya?

 

[rightwinger]

No. the dna proved that the rapist was telling the truth. Lack of dna proves that the 55 were not involved,outside of your lurid fantasies.

No one is doubting that the rapist raped the woman. The question is, why do you believe him when he claims to have been alone?


And lack of dna evidence does not prove lack fo involvement. That is the type of lie that only someone actively trying to protect rapists would say.

Well to all intents and purposes it does prove a lack of involvement. Without it you have no proof. No physical evidence, no eye witnesses, no fingerprints, no videos - nothing.

No, it does not. Especially when you have suspects saying shit like, "I just held her legs" and " I just felt her tits".


That you can seriously claim that lack of dna means it proves a lack of involvement, you are either delusional or lying.

Query: Maybe you will answer this. None of the other libs will.



You are walking in the park one night, and happen upon a rape taking place.


Do you,

a. Say to yourself, "wow, nice tits. This is a great chance to feel them, while the woman is distracted with being raped" and then grope her?


or


b. other.?



Because scenario A, is the DEFENSE of one of your heroes in this story.

Who wasn't there.

The defendant admitted that he was there. He was just really fortunate that he met a sucker in the joint willing to take the rap for this vicious attack. It made him literally millions of dollars.

And what a coincidence that the DNA of the guy in the joint matched the semen found in the woman

 

[Polishprince]

Do heads spray blood everywhere, when struck? YOu seem to be implying that they do.


I dont' have a lot of experience with hitting people in the head with a brick. As far as I know, it is quite possible that blood spray might miss a person.


And as for kneeling next to someone bleeding? Unless they are squirting blood from a severed artery, of course it would be possible to be just a few inches away and not get blood on yourself.



Your pretense that these questions are somehow, absurd to even ask,


you are either holding out of us, with your personal background, or completely full of shit.

LOLOL

What a moron you are. She was struck at least twice in the head with a rock or brick and was also slapped bare handed. A witness also claimed she was covered in blood.

You're beyond stupid to think someone could hit her in the head repeatedly with a bare hand and with a rock or brick and not get her blood on themselves.

You only serve to discredit yourself by posting such absurdities.

Say it clearly, so that we can laugh at you.


You are stating the every time you hit someone in the head with a brick, you will get significant blood on yourself.


Please state that clearly so we can laugh at you.

Dumbfuck... a brick and barehanded. The only way you couldn't get blood on yourself would be if the brick didn't break skin. And whoever beat her up, hit her hard enough in the head to blow out an eyeball.

Exactly. It was a violent attack. And that's why neighborhood activists like Donald J. Trump was interested in fingering the REAL perpetrators to get them off the street , regardless of what race of mankind they were representing with their actions.

Remember, Trump's Old Lady and children lived in this hood, Central Park is virtually right outside his door.

Which Old Lady?
Do you have any idea how big Central Park is?

Trump was still with his 1st Wife when this event came down. They were raising their family just a very short distance from Central Park on 57th Street where his children used to play. Central Park in on 59th Street, so dam straight he was pissed. And I am sure the Trumps weren't the only family that was pissed.