Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are a bad poster. You quoted a post (413), and you did not address the content of the post you quoted, BAD, BAD,
What's the matter ? Afraid to respond to the graphs ? Because YOU KNOW what they represent (unless you're even more of a knothead than you appear to be).
The fact that you cherry pick one post (which I havent even gone back to examine, but I will) while you are RUNNING SCARED SHITLESS from what has been laid out for you Posts 387, 388, 394, 395, 396. Run scared rabbit , run.Laughing.....this is YOUR list, dude. I didn't force you to make this claim. You're literally running from your own accusations:
An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level."
Your collapse, your utter lack of ability to back it with any evidence isn't my failure. Its yours.
You didn't fact check your claims. You just mechanically repeated them.....like a good little conspiracy theorist.
And now you're running from your own claim, refusing to discuss it.
If your claim had merit, you wouldn't need to run.
I haven't abandoned anything. I haven't even gone back to look at this one TINY little piece that you cherry picked, becasue I dont need to. The only thing that is needed, is for you to read ALL the material I posted, but your too scared stiff to do that.I'm good enough to make you abandon your own accusation, the first accusation on your OWN list.
When pressed to show us the evidence to back it......you refuse to discuss it. You tuck your tail between your legs and flee.
If even YOU are treating your 'evidence' like meaningless garbage to be abandoned and ignored.....surely you'll understand why I treat your claims the same way.
The fact that you cherry pick one post (which I havent even gone back to examine, but I will) while you are RUNNING SCARED SHITLESS from what has been laid out for you Posts 387, 388, 394, 395, 396. Run scared rabbit , run.
Come back in a WEEK, punk.
I don't treat anything that way. I'm just not falling for your little escape hatch scenario, and I'm also not budging one inch from insisting that you read the whole set of postings, and it is YOU who are tucking your tail between your legs and fleeing, from THAT.I'm good enough to make you abandon your own accusation, the first accusation on your OWN list.
When pressed to show us the evidence to back it......you refuse to discuss it. You tuck your tail between your legs and flee.
If even YOU are treating your 'evidence' like meaningless garbage to be abandoned and ignored.....surely you'll understand why I treat your claims the same way.
I don't treat anything that way. I'm just not falling for your little escape hatch scenario, and I'm also not budging one inch from insisting that you read the whole set of postings, and it is YOU who are tucking your tail between your legs and fleeing, from THAT.
Won't do you any good to repeat. In fact, all that does is drive you deeper and deeper into your little escape hatch basement. Hey, maybe you might meet Joe Biden down there, while he's hiding out from the lawyers are are preparing to roast him, for the documents he abused.I picked the very first item on YOUR list. I didn't make you post it.
You said this was 'evidence'.
"An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level."
But when pressed to back the claim up, to show us the evidence that 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded......you flee. You whine. You snivel.
You give one pathetic excuse after another why you shouldn't have to provide actual evidence to back up your accusation. Why you can't. Why you're incapable.
If your argument had merit, you wouldn't need to flee. And yet your tail hasn't come out from between those quivering haunches in an hour.
HA HA "fact check" - donlt you know those fact checkers are a farce ? Like everything you've said in this thread.Dude, every post you refuse to address the VERY FIRST claim on your OWN list of 'evidence'...
"An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level."
....is yet another failure. Another rout. Another demonstration that you don't fact check anything. That you merely repeat what you're told to think. Mechanically and without question.
SHOW us the evidence to back the claim that 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election.
Won't do you any good to repeat. In fact, all that does is drive you deeper and deeper into your little escape hatch basement. Hey, maybe you might meet Joe Biden down there, while he's hiding out from the lawyers are are preparing to roast him, for the documents he abused.
What a pair. Deny-lark and Joe Hiden.
HA HA "fact check" - donlt you know those fact checkers are a farce ? Like everything you've said in this thread.
This email that you keep blabbering about, was discussed at a hearing of Pima County Democrats, who held a meeting on Sept. 10, 2020 in which plans were detailed to illegally inject 35,000 votes for each Democrat at the outset in statistically adjusted embeds, that could be written off as human error if audited. Guess what, The minutes of that meeting are public record, and should be easily obtainable during business hours, So producing these minutes and seeing what they said, could/would put a lot of egg on your face.Dude, every post you refuse to address the VERY FIRST claim on your OWN list of 'evidence'...
"An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level."
....is yet another failure. Another rout. Another demonstration that you don't fact check anything. That you merely repeat what you're told to think. Mechanically and without question.
SHOW us the evidence to back the claim that 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election.
Just say the word.
This email that you keep blabbering about, was discussed at a hearing of Pima County Democrats, who held a meeting on Sept. 10, 2020 in which plans were detailed to illegally inject 35,000 votes for each Democrat at the outset in statistically adjusted embeds, that could be written off as human error if audited. Guess what, The minutes of that meeting are public record, and should be easily obtainable during business hours, So producing these minutes and seeing what they said, could/would put a lot of egg on your face.
I don't think at this point, you would like me to present that here, right ? I would be happy to do so.
crickets ***crickets***crickets****
Oh, Show you, you say. OK, so this means that your answer to my question in Post # 431 is YES > "I don't think at this point, you would like me to present that here, right ? I would be happy to do so.I'm not the one 'blabbering' about it. Its the FIRST item on YOUR list. You're blabbering about it. The first piece of 'evidence' that you presented to us.
"An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level."
Show us the evidence that 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election. Not the accusation. Not an anonymous Email. But the actual proof that 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election.
Smiling......you can't. You've got nothing. An accusation isn't evidence. You can't tell the difference.
A rational person could.
Just say the word."
Oh, Show you, you say. OK, so this means that your answer to my question in Post # 431 is YES > "I don't think at this point, you would like me to present that here, right ? I would be happy to do so.
OK I will do that as soon as business hours are here (Arizona time), Shouldnt be a problem at all.
Will you be here then, to accept the posting of these minutes, or will you just conveniently find another thread to hide out in ? My guess is the latter.
Now about the other 99.99% of the postings, not going stand up tall, to face them either, right ?
I didn't run. I told you where the evidence is, and will work to present it tomorrow, during business hours. And YOU ? Will you be here THEN ? When all you loudmouthing may very well go down in flames. Like I said, I'm guessing you won't be here, to face the music, coward. Punk. Faggot.And once again, I send you fleeing with your tail between your legs. You refuse to discuss the FIRST item on your OWN list. You presented this to us as 'evidence'.
"An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level."
This is your own claim. YOU insisted insisted this was evidence. And yet when I question your claim in any way, asking for you to show us the evidence that 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election....
......you run. Giving us one sniveling excuse after another why you're fleeing. And showing us absolutely nothing to back your claim.
If your claim had merit, you wouldn't need to abandon it.
I didn't run. I told you where the evidence is, and will work to present it tomorrow, during business hours. And YOU ? Will you be here THEN ? When all you loudmouthing may very well go down in flames. Like I said, I'm guessing you won't be here, to face the music, coward.
Finchem also told Pima County that his team was able to verify that the IP address matching the computer used to send the email is in Tucson, Arizona, but noted that he has been unable to verify the identity of the whistleblower. National File has not been able to independently verify the whistleblower’s claims.‘This is anonymous reporting and I do not want to be included in this investigation. Thank you.
Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020, There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes.
In a meeting I was invited to by the Democrat party in Pima County, Arizona on September 10, 2020, no phones or recording devices were allowed. A presentation was given including detailed plans to embed 35,000 votes in a spread configured distribution to each Democrat candidate’s vote totals.
When I asked, “How in the world would 35,000 votes be kept hidden, or from being discovered?” It was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the total registered vote range and will not exceed the registered voter count. And the 35,000 was determined allowable for Pima County based on our county registered voter count.
It was also stated total voter turnout versus total registered voters determined how many votes we can embed. The embedding will also adjust based on voter turnout. Because the embedded votes are distributed sporadically, all embedded votes will not be found if audited because embeds are in groups of approximately 1,000. This is so the County Recorder can declare an oversight issue or error, as a group of 1,000 is a normal and acceptable error.
Maricopa County’s embed totals will be substantially larger than Pima, due to embeds being calculated based on the total number of registered voters. When I asked, “Has this ever been tested, and how do we know it works?” the response was, yes, this has been tested and has shown significant success in Arizona judicial retention elections, since 2014. Even undetectable in post audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes and the full potential of the total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters. This year our Secretary of State has removed precinct level detail from election night releases, so candidates can’t see precinct over-votes.
This is what I have from this meeting. Just thought I’d report this. Not sure if you can do anything since I was unable to have a recording device at this meeting. Thank You.’
What do you mean "where" ? I told you where. Now you pretend you never saw my posts. You are a joke.Of course you ran. With your tail between your legs. You've been so run off your own claim, that you refuse to even discuss it. Let alone provide evidence to prove it. Watch, I'll make you flee again.....with another sniveling excuse why you can't address your own 'evidence'.
"An anonymous email sent to the Justice Department criminal division and Arizona legislature alleged that in Pima County, 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election on behalf of each Democratic candidate at the local and federal level."
Where's the evidence that 35,000 votes were fraudulently embedded in advance of the election? This is just an accusation.
Every time you refuse to address it, you lose. Every time you fail to provide evidence to back it, you lose. Every time you give us a sniveling excuse why you're running, you lose.
Smiling.....you did this to yourself, friend.
