Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is trying to avoid a nuke war but stop russia...not cause a nuclear war. Sending in the ships sends a SIGNAL for PUtin to knock his shit off--------Nuking as you advocate starts a nuclear war.He is stupid an Ohio class stationed at the docks in North fork could nuke Moscow
You can't prevent US citizens from coming home to the US.Cute try. I'll only reply to one, all of them are not worth my time. They too are false, as you know well!
Published February 1, 2020
China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'
By Joe McDonald, Sam McNeil | Associated Press
[...]
On Friday, the United States declared a public health emergency and President Donald Trump and an order barring entry to foreign nationals, other than immediate family of American citizens and permanent residents, who visited China within the last 14 days, which scientists say is the virus’s longest incubation period.
'Unfriendly comments'
China criticized the U.S. controls, which it said contradicted the WHO’s appeal to avoid travel bans, and “unfriendly comments” that Beijing was failing to cooperate.
“Just as the WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the U.S. rushed to go in the opposite way. Certainly not a gesture of goodwill,” said foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying.
WHO Secretary-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in Geneva that despite the emergency declaration, there is “no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade.”
[...]
China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'
China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'
###
Democrat Response to Coronavirus: End Trump’s Travel Bans on China, Iran
JOHN BINDER 11 Mar 2020 2:58
House and Senate Democrats are responding to the coronavirus outbreak in the United States by supporting measures to effectively strip President Trump of his authority to impose travel bans to protect American citizens.
While Trump has implemented travel bans on China and Iran — two of the most coronavirus-affected nations in the world — House Democrats are looking to roll back the president’s authority to enact travel bans from regions of the world.
Dems' Response to Coronavirus: End Trump's Travel Bans on China, Iran
###
Nolte: A Mere 8 Days Ago Joe Biden Was Still Attacking Trump’s Travel Bans
JOHN NOLTE 20 Mar 2020
A mere eight days ago, Joe Biden was still vocally opposing President Donald Trump’s travel bans from Europe, and even China, as racist. In other words, if Biden was the president, we can’t begin to imagine how much worse things would look in American today thanks to President Biden’s refusal to keep people out from the very same places where the Chinese coronavirus rages.
https://www.breitbart.com/.../nolte-mere-8-days-ago-joe.../
Keep laughing Markle, we now know conclusively that the first cases had reached the US by mid January.Cute try. I'll only reply to one, all of them are not worth my time. They too are false, as you know well!
Published February 1, 2020
China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'
By Joe McDonald, Sam McNeil | Associated Press
[...]
On Friday, the United States declared a public health emergency and President Donald Trump and an order barring entry to foreign nationals, other than immediate family of American citizens and permanent residents, who visited China within the last 14 days, which scientists say is the virus’s longest incubation period.
'Unfriendly comments'
China criticized the U.S. controls, which it said contradicted the WHO’s appeal to avoid travel bans, and “unfriendly comments” that Beijing was failing to cooperate.
“Just as the WHO recommended against travel restrictions, the U.S. rushed to go in the opposite way. Certainly not a gesture of goodwill,” said foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying.
WHO Secretary-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in Geneva that despite the emergency declaration, there is “no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade.”
[...]
China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'
China slams Trump's coronavirus travel limits: 'Not a gesture of goodwill'
###
Democrat Response to Coronavirus: End Trump’s Travel Bans on China, Iran
JOHN BINDER 11 Mar 2020 2:58
House and Senate Democrats are responding to the coronavirus outbreak in the United States by supporting measures to effectively strip President Trump of his authority to impose travel bans to protect American citizens.
While Trump has implemented travel bans on China and Iran — two of the most coronavirus-affected nations in the world — House Democrats are looking to roll back the president’s authority to enact travel bans from regions of the world.
Dems' Response to Coronavirus: End Trump's Travel Bans on China, Iran
###
Nolte: A Mere 8 Days Ago Joe Biden Was Still Attacking Trump’s Travel Bans
JOHN NOLTE 20 Mar 2020
A mere eight days ago, Joe Biden was still vocally opposing President Donald Trump’s travel bans from Europe, and even China, as racist. In other words, if Biden was the president, we can’t begin to imagine how much worse things would look in American today thanks to President Biden’s refusal to keep people out from the very same places where the Chinese coronavirus rages.
https://www.breitbart.com/.../nolte-mere-8-days-ago-joe.../
www.theguardian.com
Yes you certainly can in a pandemic under the emergency powers of the president.You can't prevent US citizens from coming home to the US.
That's just goofy. Why do you throw out such lies. Desperation?Disagree all you want, by the time that limited ban went into effect it had already reached our shores.
As soon as we knew there was an epidemic in China we should have cut off all travel from Asia immediately except for returning Americans and Vis Holders who then should have been quarantined before being allowed into the interior.
As soon as it was know to have spread beyond Asia, we should have put in effect a complete international travel ban for all but the same Americans and Visa holders to be quarantined.
It would have been a precedential and historical action but could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives as we ramped up for the inevitable giving us months of lead time to prepare.
He is trying to avoid a nuke war but stop russia...not cause a nuclear war. Sending in the ships sends a SIGNAL for PUtin to knock his shit off--------Nuking as you advocate starts a nuclear war.
Peace is obtained and kept threw strength not by hiding in a corner and not be throwing aimless punches.
Absolutely. We can quarantine them, but how do you refuse a citizen?Yes you certainly can in a pandemic under the emergency powers of the president.
We could have done just what we did with the first couple of groups of fliers and ship passengers and quarantined them for two weeks before releasing them into the interior.
I haven't lied about anything, I don't need to and I documented it.That's just goofy. Why do you throw out such lies. Desperation?
Simple, you say you can't come into the US during this emergency without first clearing two weeks of quarantine upon arrival.Absolutely. We can quarantine them, but how do you refuse a citizen?
My guess is that you forgot that China AND the World Health Organization told the World that COVID was not dangerous.Keep laughing Markle, we now know conclusively that the first cases had reached the US by mid January.
Tracing 'patient zero': why America's first coronavirus death may for ever go unmarked
Experts are investigating how the coronavirus spread through the US – but pinpointing its arrival is nearly impossible
Trump is just a man, not a god and all men have flaws and make mistakes.
This was probably the worst mistake of his entire presidency.
Markle you need to get a grip on reality. That can be done and has been done including on a limited basis by Trump.Simple, you say you can't come into the US during this emergency without first clearing two weeks of quarantine upon arrival.
I haven't forgotten anythign and our own Intel people knew there was an ongoing epidemic in China weeks before the Chinese announced it.My guess is that you forgot that China AND the World Health Organization told the World that COVID was not dangerous.
Much as it pains and chaps you, President Trump did an excellent job of handling the COVID pandemic. It and the entire country has gone to heck in a hand basket.
You can whine all you want and say it isn't true, BUT even Democrats are fleeing him like rats from a sinking ship.
We are in deep doo-doo and all your denials and whining isn't going to change the facts. It is what it is.
Even you can't fix what you don't acknowledge.
www.cnn.com
nypost.com
What pains me is that sycophants can't admit he's human and made mistakes.My guess is that you forgot that China AND the World Health Organization told the World that COVID was not dangerous.
Much as it pains and chaps you, President Trump did an excellent job of handling the COVID pandemic. It and the entire country has gone to heck in a hand basket.
You can whine all you want and say it isn't true, BUT even Democrats are fleeing him like rats from a sinking ship.
We are in deep doo-doo and all your denials and whining isn't going to change the facts. It is what it is.
Even you can't fix what you don't acknowledge.
I would think the new Columbia class subs could launch their Trident II D5LE payload in relatively shallow water, given the upgrades to the missile compartment (which it shares in common with the UK's new Dreadnought class ballistic subs)In fact, a Trident missile can't be launched from the docks. It must be ejected from a submerged submarine inside a steam bubble and rocket motors ignite when it broaches the surface.
Firing the rocket engines in the tube would destroy the tube and, most likely, ignite the other rockets.
I would think the new Columbia class subs could launch their Trident II D5LE payload in relatively shallow water,
Actually the newer Trident II D5 ballistic missiles, which are currently carried by Ohio class subs (SSBN-734 and later) and the upcoming Columbia class subs, are rated for first-strike, counterforce, and second-strike capabilities. And the ongoing D5LE program is intended to bring further upgrades to the guidance and reentry systems for the Trident II, enhancing all three of those capabilities.Well, actually they are both, certainly a defensive deterrent and a 2nd Strike weapon.
the Navy is also currently developing a new nuclear armed cruise missile dubbed SLCM-N (sea launched cruise missile), which is slated to be deployed on Virginia class attack subs.
Yes, but the nuclear variant (TLAM-N, aka 109A) was retired a decade ago...all of the Tomahawk variants currently in service are outfitted with conventional payloads. This would be the first nuclear armed cruise missile in U.S. Navy service since the Tomahawk's nuclear variant was retired.Tomahawk cruise missiles have been deployed on Los Angeles class submarines since 1981.
You may well be right about the Trident but I know that Polaris missile were launched from the surfaceIn fact, a Trident missile can't be launched from the docks. It must be ejected from a submerged submarine inside a steam bubble and rocket motors ignite when it broaches the surface.
Firing the rocket engines in the tube would destroy the tube and, most likely, ignite the other rockets.
