Trump's Attorney Ordered To Appear In Court Friday Sept. 9 On Rape Allegations Against Trump

[Katzndogz]

The words "It is hereby ORDERED doesn't mean anything particularly special. This is a standard status conference with standard status conference language. The case might be dismissed. Or, the plainiff at least ordered to effect service.

 

[Katzndogz]

That's not a stupid question. SOMEONE made a motion on August 25th to delay the date of the pretrial conference until October. Who was it? The plaintiff? Trump/Epstein? Or the court?

It was a stupid question. The plaintiff didn't fulfill her obligations so the court gave her more time to serve Trump with summons and the complaint. Until she does that, nothing can proceed.

Yes but...WHO MOVED THE COURT TO DO THAT? The court itself in its own motion? The plaintiff? Or the defendants? ANSWER THE QUESTION if you can.. Judges don't just wake up in the morning and scribble down new orders at their bedside table. They have formal motions to do so. WHO MADE THE MOTION?

While there are sometimes motions for continuances, they are more often made in writing by a Request for Continuance or if both parties agree it will be a Stipulation for Continuance.

As for who made it, there's no secret. Hustle down to the courthouse and look in the record.

 

[Lakhota]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

May justice be served.

 

[Silhouette]

That's not a stupid question. SOMEONE made a motion on August 25th to delay the date of the pretrial conference until October. Who was it? The plaintiff? Trump/Epstein? Or the court?

It was a stupid question. The plaintiff didn't fulfill her obligations so the court gave her more time to serve Trump with summons and the complaint. Until she does that, nothing can proceed.

Yes but...WHO MOVED THE COURT TO DO THAT? The court itself in its own motion? The plaintiff? Or the defendants? ANSWER THE QUESTION if you can.. Judges don't just wake up in the morning and scribble down new orders at their bedside table. They have formal motions to do so. WHO MADE THE MOTION?

There was no motion because there was no case because the plaintiff never fulfilled her obligations. Who advised the judge that the case couldn't proceed because the plaintiff hadn't fulfilled her legal obligations? Probably the court clerk since that's part of his or her job.

Man you're being shady. The case is not dismissed; otherwise it wouldn't have a pretrial conference set still in October. The plaintiff was given the full amount of time to produce proof of service (even though the court record reflects it has proof of electronic service of both defendants ?) and that's why the date was put out to October; if that indeed is what happened. The decision to do that from the link you gave occurred on August 25th. The court clerk is not authorized to make orders. The judge is the only one who can do that. So either the judge or the plaintiff or the defendants moved to postpone. And this is done in a motion.

So you don't know who moved the court to postpone? Can you at least access a copy of the August 25th Order? Still think someone should take a peek in the courtroom on September 9th just to be sure it didn't get jumbled around.

In the case of rape of a child and its allegations, the court will almost never use or allow manipulation of procedures to squelch the case. The court will allow every lenience it has because it might look like then that the court itself is aiding and abetting the squelching of the cries of child rape.

 

[toomuchtime_]

That's not a stupid question. SOMEONE made a motion on August 25th to delay the date of the pretrial conference until October. Who was it? The plaintiff? Trump/Epstein? Or the court?

It was a stupid question. The plaintiff didn't fulfill her obligations so the court gave her more time to serve Trump with summons and the complaint. Until she does that, nothing can proceed.

Yes but...WHO MOVED THE COURT TO DO THAT? The court itself in its own motion? The plaintiff? Or the defendants? ANSWER THE QUESTION if you can.. Judges don't just wake up in the morning and scribble down new orders at their bedside table. They have formal motions to do so. WHO MADE THE MOTION?

There was no motion because there was no case because the plaintiff never fulfilled her obligations. Who advised the judge that the case couldn't proceed because the plaintiff hadn't fulfilled her legal obligations? Probably the court clerk since that's part of his or her job.

Man you're being shady. The case is not dismissed; otherwise it wouldn't have a pretrial conference set still in October. The plaintiff was given the full amount of time to produce proof of service and that's why the date was put out to October; if that indeed is what happened. The decision to do that from the link you gave occurred on August 25th. The court clerk is not authorized to make orders. The judge is the only one who can do that. So either the judge or the plaintiff or the defendants moved to postpone. And this is done in a motion.

So you don't know who moved the court to postpone? Can you at least access a copy of the August 25th Order? Still think someone should take a peek in the courtroom on September 9th just to be sure it didn't get jumbled around.

I never said it was dismissed, I said it couldn't proceed because the plaintiff had not effected service, just what you are now saying, so the court delayed proceedings until she fulfilled her obligations. What makes you think the court has to be told by some one else what its procedures require?

 

[jillian]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

the case conference has been adjourned until October

Doe v. Trump et al (1:16-cv-04642), New York Southern District Court

in the meantime, this is the complaint in the case

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

 

[Silhouette]

^^ Yes but do you live in NYNY and can you get to the courthouse to find who motioned for the delay in the 1st pretrial conference? The court, the plaintiff or the defendants?

 

[g5000]

Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump.

Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted.

Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed.

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

 

[g5000]

The duress had prevented Plaintiff from starting litigation before this year. However, as soon as she surfaced, she received threats. More specifically, shortly after her first complaint was filed in California on April 26, 2016, she started receiving threatening phone calls on her cell phone.

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

 

[g5000]

 

[g5000]

 

[g5000]

 

[g5000]

If the plaintiff is having a hard time serving the order to Trump, she just needs to go to one of his rallies, with all the cameras rolling, and serve him.

 

[Silhouette]

The duress had prevented Plaintiff from starting litigation before this year. However, as soon as she surfaced, she received threats. More specifically, shortly after her first complaint was filed in California on April 26, 2016, she started receiving threatening phone calls on her cell phone.

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

Wow, that part I didn't know. Holy crap!

 

[toomuchtime_]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

the case conference has been adjourned until October

Doe v. Trump et al (1:16-cv-04642), New York Southern District Court

in the meantime, this is the complaint in the case

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

So this is what Hillary's campaign has been reduced to, a lawsuit so bogus that the plaintiff has not even followed through with her obligations to move it forward. Perhaps she now feels Hillary has not paid her enough to continue.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

the case conference has been adjourned until October

Doe v. Trump et al (1:16-cv-04642), New York Southern District Court

in the meantime, this is the complaint in the case

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

So this is what Hillary's campaign has been reduced to, a lawsuit so bogus that the plaintiff has not even followed through with her obligations to move it forward. Perhaps she now feels Hillary has not paid her enough to continue.

Really? You're blaming Hllary for Trumps inability to be non-criminal? You're a piece of trash and I want you out of my god for saken country.

 

[hazlnut]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

Here's the sick part.

He'll still get votes after this.

 

[jillian]

^^ Yes but do you live in NYNY and can you get to the courthouse to find who motioned for the delay in the 1st pretrial conference? The court, the plaintiff or the defendants?

if you click on the link, it says why there was an adjournment. you don't need to "get to the courthouse"

Doe v. Trump et al (1:16-cv-04642), New York Southern District Court

that's why there are links.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

the case conference has been adjourned until October

Doe v. Trump et al (1:16-cv-04642), New York Southern District Court

in the meantime, this is the complaint in the case

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

So this is what Hillary's campaign has been reduced to, a lawsuit so bogus that the plaintiff has not even followed through with her obligations to move it forward. Perhaps she now feels Hillary has not paid her enough to continue.

Really? You're blaming Hllary for Trumps inability to be non-criminal? You're a piece of trash and I want you out of my god for saken country.

Even you can't be stupid enough not to wonder why after twenty years only now in the middle of a presidential campaign this lawsuit was started. Of course it was Hillary's campaign that instigated this bogus lawsuit and probably paid the woman to file it.

 

[jillian]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

Here's the sick part.

He'll still get votes after this.

he said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and it wouldn't matter to the trumpsters.

he wasn't wrong.