Trump's Attorney Ordered To Appear In Court Friday Sept. 9 On Rape Allegations Against Trump

[toomuchtime_]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

Here's the sick part.

He'll still get votes after this.

He'll get votes because the lawsuit is obviously bogus.

 

[jillian]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

the case conference has been adjourned until October

Doe v. Trump et al (1:16-cv-04642), New York Southern District Court

in the meantime, this is the complaint in the case

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

So this is what Hillary's campaign has been reduced to, a lawsuit so bogus that the plaintiff has not even followed through with her obligations to move it forward. Perhaps she now feels Hillary has not paid her enough to continue.

Really? You're blaming Hllary for Trumps inability to be non-criminal? You're a piece of trash and I want you out of my god for saken country.

Even you can't be stupid enough not to wonder why after twenty years only now in the middle of a presidential campaign this lawsuit was started. Of course it was Hillary's campaign that instigated this bogus lawsuit and probably paid the woman to file it.

you mean like gennifer flowers' civil lawsuit against bill Clinton was filed on the day the statute of limitations was going to run? like that bogus claim?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

the case conference has been adjourned until October

Doe v. Trump et al (1:16-cv-04642), New York Southern District Court

in the meantime, this is the complaint in the case

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

So this is what Hillary's campaign has been reduced to, a lawsuit so bogus that the plaintiff has not even followed through with her obligations to move it forward. Perhaps she now feels Hillary has not paid her enough to continue.

Really? You're blaming Hllary for Trumps inability to be non-criminal? You're a piece of trash and I want you out of my god for saken country.

Even you can't be stupid enough not to wonder why after twenty years only now in the middle of a presidential campaign this lawsuit was started. Of course it was Hillary's campaign that instigated this bogus lawsuit and probably paid the woman to file it.

you mean like gennifer flowers' civil lawsuit against bill Clinton was filed on the day the statute of limitations was going to run? like that bogus claim?

Probably for the same reason but of course we know Flowers' lawsuit had a basis in fact.

 

[jillian]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

Here's the sick part.

He'll still get votes after this.

He'll get votes because the lawsuit is obviously bogus.

so funny how trumpsters believe every garbage allegation about Hillary Clinton but don't like when someone tells the truth about the orange bigoted fascist.

tough

 

[jillian]

the case conference has been adjourned until October

Doe v. Trump et al (1:16-cv-04642), New York Southern District Court

in the meantime, this is the complaint in the case

Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein Rape Lawsuit and Affidavits

So this is what Hillary's campaign has been reduced to, a lawsuit so bogus that the plaintiff has not even followed through with her obligations to move it forward. Perhaps she now feels Hillary has not paid her enough to continue.

Really? You're blaming Hllary for Trumps inability to be non-criminal? You're a piece of trash and I want you out of my god for saken country.

Even you can't be stupid enough not to wonder why after twenty years only now in the middle of a presidential campaign this lawsuit was started. Of course it was Hillary's campaign that instigated this bogus lawsuit and probably paid the woman to file it.

you mean like gennifer flowers' civil lawsuit against bill Clinton was filed on the day the statute of limitations was going to run? like that bogus claim?

Probably for the same reason but of course we know Flowers' lawsuit had a basis in fact.

do we? she had a long term consensual affair with him and was used by the Arkansas hit squad

I think the suit against dumb Donald is true or at least probable. he's creepy around his own daughter.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Sep 15: Doe vs. Donald J. Trump: Parties to appear in court 4 status conference (GD 16) - Democratic Underground
************
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

USDC-SDNY
DOC#:
DATE FILED: 6/30/2016
No. 16-CV-4642 (RA)
ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE

It is hereby:

ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on

September 9, 2016 at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1506 of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York,
New York.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties
jointly submit to the

Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order."

All parties must also submit a letter to the court:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties submit a
joint letter, not to exceed five (5) pages, providing the following
information in separate paragraphs:

1.A brief description of the nature of the action and the principal defenses

thereto;

2. A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. If any
party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation
and the principal place of business. If any party is a partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the
citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners and/or
trustees;
3. A brief description of all contemplated and/or outstanding motions and
how such motions may affect scheduling in this matter;
4. A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and/or
that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful
settlement negotiations;

5. A brief description of prior settlement discussions (without disclosing the
parties' offers or settlement positions) and the prospect of settlement;
6. The estimated length of trial; and
7. Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in
advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a
description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by September 2, 2016, the parties jointly submit to the
Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is
available at U.S. District Court • Southern District of New York. The status letter and the proposed case
management plan should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with Section 13 .1 of the
Court's Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Rules & Instructions, available at
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf/ecf_rules _ 080113 .pdf.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve Defendants with a copy of this order and to file an affidavit
on ECF certifying that such service has been effectuated.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2016
New York, New York
Ronnie Abrams
United States District Judge
**********

The court is ordering convicted child molester Jeffrey Epstein to answer together with Trump; not as separate defendants. The case stems from a woman coming forward alleging Trump tied her up and raped her as a 13 year old on a couple occasions at Epstein's Manhattan apartment during the Summer of 1994. She says he threatened to do harm to her and her family members if she ever told. So the statute of limitations may not apply; and certainly when it comes to rape of a child, and intimidation, the court relaxes those requirements more often than not. There are apparently witnesses to the alleged events.

For anyone interested in the progression of the case, or to appear, the date and time and location is given above. I'd like to see a copy of the letter that Trump and Epstein submit. I think that the plaintiff also has to submit a letter anonymously (because of the allegations of threats) via her attorney. Not exactly sure on that one.

Trump & Epstein's defense/settlement outline letter was supposed to be filed last Friday, September 2nd. So a copy of that should be on record already. Again, if anyone is near that courthouse, would be nice to see a copy posted here. Thanks in advance.

Here's the sick part.

He'll still get votes after this.

He'll get votes because the lawsuit is obviously bogus.

so funny how trumpsters believe every garbage allegation about Hillary Clinton but don't like when someone tells the truth about the orange bigoted fascist.

tough

Like Hillary, you seem confused by what the word, truth, means. The lawsuit was first filed in California but the judge threw it out, so then it was filed in New York and the plaintiff failed to follow through on it by serving Trump with a copy of the summons and affidavit so the lawsuit can't proceed. It is obviously bogus and obviously just another one of Dirty Hillary's dirty tricks.

 

[toomuchtime_]

So this is what Hillary's campaign has been reduced to, a lawsuit so bogus that the plaintiff has not even followed through with her obligations to move it forward. Perhaps she now feels Hillary has not paid her enough to continue.

Really? You're blaming Hllary for Trumps inability to be non-criminal? You're a piece of trash and I want you out of my god for saken country.

Even you can't be stupid enough not to wonder why after twenty years only now in the middle of a presidential campaign this lawsuit was started. Of course it was Hillary's campaign that instigated this bogus lawsuit and probably paid the woman to file it.

you mean like gennifer flowers' civil lawsuit against bill Clinton was filed on the day the statute of limitations was going to run? like that bogus claim?

Probably for the same reason but of course we know Flowers' lawsuit had a basis in fact.

do we? she had a long term consensual affair with him and was used by the Arkansas hit squad

I think the suit against dumb Donald is true or at least probable. he's creepy around his own daughter.

You don't believe that but there really isn't anything a supporter of that withered old hag can do but tell lies about Trump.

 

[Lakhota]

Really? You're blaming Hllary for Trumps inability to be non-criminal? You're a piece of trash and I want you out of my god for saken country.

Even you can't be stupid enough not to wonder why after twenty years only now in the middle of a presidential campaign this lawsuit was started. Of course it was Hillary's campaign that instigated this bogus lawsuit and probably paid the woman to file it.

you mean like gennifer flowers' civil lawsuit against bill Clinton was filed on the day the statute of limitations was going to run? like that bogus claim?

Probably for the same reason but of course we know Flowers' lawsuit had a basis in fact.

do we? she had a long term consensual affair with him and was used by the Arkansas hit squad

I think the suit against dumb Donald is true or at least probable. he's creepy around his own daughter.

You don't believe that but there really isn't anything a supporter of that withered old hag can do but tell lies about Trump.

Actually, Forrest Trump is very capable at telling his own lies. He doesn't need help...

 

[Silhouette]

Like Hillary, you seem confused by what the word, truth, means. The lawsuit was first filed in California but the judge threw it out, so then it was filed in New York and the plaintiff failed to follow through on it by serving Trump with a copy of the summons and affidavit so the lawsuit can't proceed. It is obviously bogus and obviously just another one of Dirty Hillary's dirty tricks.

1. The lawsuit was thrown out in California not for its merits, but because of being filed in the wrong jurisdiction. It has since been refiled in the proper jurisdiction.

2. The lawsuit has not been dismissed and CAN proceed. Evidenced by the fact that the first pretrial conference has been rescheduled until October, ostensibly (though I still think reporters interested should peep in court on September 9 just to be sure). If the case "can't proceed", it would have been dismissed already. But it hasn't been.

So, stop lying about the case, will you?

 

[Silhouette]

Actually, Forrest Trump is very capable at telling his own lies. He doesn't need help...

It's true, Cheeto-Jesus has been known to spin a yarn or two.

 

[Lakhota]

It doesn't sound good for Trump.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Like Hillary, you seem confused by what the word, truth, means. The lawsuit was first filed in California but the judge threw it out, so then it was filed in New York and the plaintiff failed to follow through on it by serving Trump with a copy of the summons and affidavit so the lawsuit can't proceed. It is obviously bogus and obviously just another one of Dirty Hillary's dirty tricks.

1. The lawsuit was thrown out in California not for its merits, but because of being filed in the wrong jurisdiction. It has since been refiled in the proper jurisdiction.

2. The lawsuit has not been dismissed and CAN proceed. Evidenced by the fact that the first pretrial conference has been rescheduled until October, ostensibly (though I still think reporters interested should peep in court on September 9 just to be sure). If the case "can't proceed", it would have been dismissed already. But it hasn't been.

So, stop lying about the case, will you?

Apparently you never get tired of lying and sounding stupid. She filed charges in federal court and rape is not prosecuted in federal court so the judge threw the case out because she had not shown evidence of civil rights violations, the only charge that could be prosecuted in federal court. Were you not quite so stupid and ignorant, you would know any federal district court in California, her state of residence, or New York, Trump's state of residence is the right jurisdiction for this case.

After her California case was thrown out of court, and New York lawyer read about it on a gossip website and contacted her and asked if he could represent her, she consented and now he has filed the same bogus case in New York federal court. It might interest you to know that another underage girl who claimed to have been molested at Epstein's parties claimed Bill Clinton attended that party.

 

[Katzndogz]

It sounds like the same crap democrats have been digging up all along.

 

[toomuchtime_]

It doesn't sound good for Trump.

Another of the underaged girls from Epstein's parties claims Bill Clinton attended that party. How does that sound to you?

 

[Katzndogz]

Like Hillary, you seem confused by what the word, truth, means. The lawsuit was first filed in California but the judge threw it out, so then it was filed in New York and the plaintiff failed to follow through on it by serving Trump with a copy of the summons and affidavit so the lawsuit can't proceed. It is obviously bogus and obviously just another one of Dirty Hillary's dirty tricks.

1. The lawsuit was thrown out in California not for its merits, but because of being filed in the wrong jurisdiction. It has since been refiled in the proper jurisdiction.

2. The lawsuit has not been dismissed and CAN proceed. Evidenced by the fact that the first pretrial conference has been rescheduled until October, ostensibly (though I still think reporters interested should peep in court on September 9 just to be sure). If the case "can't proceed", it would have been dismissed already. But it hasn't been.

So, stop lying about the case, will you?

Apparently you never get tired of lying and sounding stupid. She filed charges in federal court and rape is not prosecuted in federal court so the judge threw the case out because she had not shown evidence of civil rights violations, the only charge that could be prosecuted in federal court. Were you not quite so stupid and ignorant, you would know any federal district court in California, her state of residence, or New York, Trump's state of residence is the right jurisdiction for this case.

After her California case was thrown out of court, and New York lawyer read about it on a gossip website and contacted her and asked if he could represent her, she consented and now he has filed the same bogus case in New York federal court. It might interest you to know that another underage girl who claimed to have been molested at Epstein's parties claimed Bill Clinton attended that party.

The difference is, Bill Clinton was a frequent island visitor. Trump never went to lolita island. He attended a dinner where Epstein was also a guest.

If this case proceeds the plaintiff will have to come up with the specific dates on which she claimed to have been molested. Sometime in 1994 won't cut it.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Like Hillary, you seem confused by what the word, truth, means. The lawsuit was first filed in California but the judge threw it out, so then it was filed in New York and the plaintiff failed to follow through on it by serving Trump with a copy of the summons and affidavit so the lawsuit can't proceed. It is obviously bogus and obviously just another one of Dirty Hillary's dirty tricks.

1. The lawsuit was thrown out in California not for its merits, but because of being filed in the wrong jurisdiction. It has since been refiled in the proper jurisdiction.

2. The lawsuit has not been dismissed and CAN proceed. Evidenced by the fact that the first pretrial conference has been rescheduled until October, ostensibly (though I still think reporters interested should peep in court on September 9 just to be sure). If the case "can't proceed", it would have been dismissed already. But it hasn't been.

So, stop lying about the case, will you?

Apparently you never get tired of lying and sounding stupid. She filed charges in federal court and rape is not prosecuted in federal court so the judge threw the case out because she had not shown evidence of civil rights violations, the only charge that could be prosecuted in federal court. Were you not quite so stupid and ignorant, you would know any federal district court in California, her state of residence, or New York, Trump's state of residence is the right jurisdiction for this case.

After her California case was thrown out of court, and New York lawyer read about it on a gossip website and contacted her and asked if he could represent her, she consented and now he has filed the same bogus case in New York federal court. It might interest you to know that another underage girl who claimed to have been molested at Epstein's parties claimed Bill Clinton attended that party.

The difference is, Bill Clinton was a frequent island visitor. Trump never went to lolita island. He attended a dinner where Epstein was also a guest.

If this case proceeds the plaintiff will have to come up with the specific dates on which she claimed to have been molested. Sometime in 1994 won't cut it.

The case won't proceed because Trump isn't some one you can harass with frivolous lawsuits without paying a price. Right now, the lawyer, who had stated he was not representing her on behalf of his law firm, is refusing o accept phone calls and his law firm's website has been taken down. It is a federal crime to file a frivolous lawsuit in federal court for the purpose of harassing some one. The case will not proceed because if it does, he is likely to be disbarred and he and his client face severe financial penalties. This is why they have not served Trump with a copy of the summons and complaint so that the case could move forward.

They are just two more victims of the ruthless Clintons.

 

[Silhouette]

The case won't proceed because Trump isn't some one you can harass with frivolous lawsuits without paying a price...

You see, that's exactly the allegations she's made against him. Allegations of rape against a 13 year old aren't "frivolous". Promising that if she doesn't drop the suit "she'll pay a price' is exactly why she kept silent for fear he would hurt her; so her affidavit says. You just lent credence to her case.

 

[Rozman]

How many years is Trump looking at here?

 

[toomuchtime_]

The case won't proceed because Trump isn't some one you can harass with frivolous lawsuits without paying a price...

You see, that's exactly the allegations she's made against him. Allegations of rape against a 13 year old aren't "frivolous". Promising that if she doesn't drop the suit "she'll pay a price' is exactly why she kept silent for fear he would hurt her; so her affidavit says. You just lent credence to her case.

 

[ScienceRocks]

How can anyone vote for a man that is in front of so many judges for doing wrong or possibly doing wrong?