Bruce_T_Laney
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #761
76 'Pages' after O'Donnell admitted he lied & the thread continues....
Bwuhahahaha...
.
It is hilarious!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
76 'Pages' after O'Donnell admitted he lied & the thread continues....
Bwuhahahaha...
.
Right, that's what happens when a source leaks to someone. That shows it is likely untrue? In what sense?No, what I am saying is only one person is making the claim
Uh...then we know there was no co-signer? What would you expect to happen?What happens if there is no Cosigner?
Because it is, so far,bnot well sourced or verified....?Funny you refuse to answer the question, so why is MSNBC backing away from the accusation?
Because it is, so far,bnot well sourced or verified....?Funny you refuse to answer the question, so why is MSNBC backing away from the accusation?
In what way does that lend support to the idea that it is false?
Uh...then we know there was no co-signer? What would you expect to happen?What happens if there is no Cosigner?
And why doesnt trump release a document or two to show that? Why is he suing, instead of doing what he usually does with the rumors of scandal surrounding him, and troll the shit out of tem?
There's a pattern. You see it.
Yes, thank you, captain obvious.The documents are not required to be shown and are none of your business.
Out of curiosity, of course. I would like some insight into why deutsche bank lent deadbeat donnie hundreds of millions while he was in default of hundreds of millions.Why do you need to see them
Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?Precisely, even though that is the topic. That's your cultism at work, as the topic might disparage trump. Do you plan to assist me all evening in making my points?now i didn't say shit about trump
So... What part of this rumor being true would surprise you or not make sense? It's okay to be honest. Nobody is going to pull your trump club card.
Yes, thank you, captain obvious.The documents are not required to be shown and are none of your business.
And you believe that is why he won't show one? Haha...come on. You cant possibly believe that.
Out of curiosity, of course. I would like some insight into why deutsche bank lent deadbeat donnie hundreds of millions while he was in default of hundreds of millions.Why do you need to see them
Is this all you got? To admonish ke by telling me its none of my business?
Ha, thats a pretty weak sauce defense of trump. You're like his mommy at the front door, when he bit a neighbor kid and the other kid's mom comes to the door. "Get off my property!!"
when the fuck has he ever needed evidence? hell the entire stance of this thread got shot to diarrhea hell and he's still slinging that shit.Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?Precisely, even though that is the topic. That's your cultism at work, as the topic might disparage trump. Do you plan to assist me all evening in making my points?now i didn't say shit about trump
So... What part of this rumor being true would surprise you or not make sense? It's okay to be honest. Nobody is going to pull your trump club card.
Here's a clue: the whole thing makes no sense but that hasn't stopped TDS-crazed posters from setting their hair on fire ... again.
when the fuck has he ever needed evidence? hell the entire stance of this thread got shot to diarrhea hell and he's still slinging that shit.Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?Precisely, even though that is the topic. That's your cultism at work, as the topic might disparage trump. Do you plan to assist me all evening in making my points?now i didn't say shit about trump
So... What part of this rumor being true would surprise you or not make sense? It's okay to be honest. Nobody is going to pull your trump club card.
Here's a clue: the whole thing makes no sense but that hasn't stopped TDS-crazed posters from setting their hair on fire ... again.
No, of course. I just say it makes sense and is believable. And i argued why. Over and over and over. Then you ignore all of those points and ask this stupid fucking question? Come on.Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?
Idiots do idiotic shit.when the fuck has he ever needed evidence? hell the entire stance of this thread got shot to diarrhea hell and he's still slinging that shit.Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?Precisely, even though that is the topic. That's your cultism at work, as the topic might disparage trump. Do you plan to assist me all evening in making my points?now i didn't say shit about trump
So... What part of this rumor being true would surprise you or not make sense? It's okay to be honest. Nobody is going to pull your trump club card.
Here's a clue: the whole thing makes no sense but that hasn't stopped TDS-crazed posters from setting their hair on fire ... again.
He has stated his evidence is that Trump refuses to show those papers...
Even if Trump did show those papers those like that poster and Op'er would scream it is a lie...
I mean the poster believe he or she has the right to see those papers, so ya know they are as clueless as those that believe the Popular Vote elect the President...
I only stated that as some of the evidence that it makes sense. I also stated more, like:He has stated his evidence is that Trump refuses to show those papers...
No, of course. I just say it makes sense and is believable. And i argued why. Over and over and over. Then you ignore all of those points and ask this stupid fucking question? Come on.Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?
Not part of my argument at all. This is trump cultism, trying hard to divert away from the topic.I mean the poster believe he or she has the right to see those papers
No, of course. I just say it makes sense and is believable. And i argued why. Over and over and over. Then you ignore all of those points and ask this stupid fucking question? Come on.Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?
Of course it is a stupid question, as nobody here, has claimed or even implied to see any of the evidence, nor is seeng any of it germane to any of the points i made.It is not a stupid
I only stated that as some of the evidence that it makes sense. I also stated more, like:He has stated his evidence is that Trump refuses to show those papers...
The fact that trump was a deadbeat who got a loan from the very institution to which he was in default, and so the requirement of a co-signer would make sense...
And that he would need a billonaire to co-sign such a loan...
And that he is a well known deadbeat in this country, so a foreigner makes sense....
And that trump loves him some Russians, so a russian oligarch makes sense....
But saying all this doesnt make for a very good simple, memeish post on your part, so you misrepresent me instead.
I absolutely do and agree 100% he should not have reported it.Do you not understand WHY ethical journalists never take the word of one "unnamed" source as factual until they verify the story with other sources?
Of course it is a stupid question, as nobody here, has claimed or even implied to see any of the evidence, nor is seeng any of it germane to any of the points i made.It is not a stupid
So yes, it's a stupid question, and a diversion.