Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not once have I done so, and i have directly invited one and all to challenge the points i have made.No, it is not a diversion but pointing out you are just spewing your opinion as fact
I absolutely do and agree 100% he should not have reported it.Do you not understand WHY ethical journalists never take the word of one "unnamed" source as factual until they verify the story with other sources?
Again...good god people, pay attention this time...i am saying i think it makes sense and that it is believable.
Do you disagree with that, or not?
I also think we will find out, either way.
Not once have I done so, and i have directly invited one and all to challenge the points i have made.No, it is not a diversion but pointing out you are just spewing your opinion as fact
Instead, I get this dog and pony show from you terrified trumpers.
So, what part of any of this would not make sense to you, and why? What part of any of this would surprise you, and why?
Come on, give it a shot.
Not part of my argument at all. This is trump cultism, trying hard to divert away from the topic.I mean the poster believe he or she has the right to see those papers
Thats not opinion. That's a well known fact. Peolle were surprised the first time deusmtsche lent to him, and for goodd reason. Then, he defaulted, to the surprise of few. Then, that same bank, while he was in default, lent him the money to oay itself back and hundreds of millions more.Awww, so you believe there is a cosigner because in your opinion he is a deadbeat and no bank would loan to him...
Thats not opinion. That's a well known fact. Peolle were surprised the first time deusmtsche lent to him, and for goodd reason. Then, he defaulted, to the surprise of few. Then, that same bank, while he was in default, lent him the money to oay itself back and hundreds of millions more.Awww, so you believe there is a cosigner because in your opinion he is a deadbeat and no bank would loan to him...
Those are not opinions. Those are,indeed, solid facts.
See, this is why one cant have an honest discussikn with you cultists. If you thought water beibg wet somehow reeflected badly on trump, you qould eat up all the oxygen in the room arguing that water Isn't wet
Well, that's a very elementary and silly error on your part, as the idea that MSNBM does not oossess the secretive documemts doesnt mean they don't exist. What a silly thing for you to say.No, I do not agree because if there was any evidence to support what was leaked MSNB
Yes, it is my opnion that a co-signer requurement makes sense and is believable, based on all the actual reasons anyone would ever need a co-signer, all demonstrated by deadbeat donnnie. Those , again, are facts. And my opinion is based on them. And you want to talk about anything but these facts, and everyone knows why, including you.It is your opinion that there is a cosigner with no actual evidence!
Well, that's a very elementary and silly error on your part, as the idea that MSNBM does not oossess the secretive documemts doesnt mean they don't exist. What a silly thing for you to say.No, I do not agree because if there was any evidence to support what was leaked MSNB
Yes, it is my opnion that a co-signer requurement makes sense and is believable, based on all the actual reasons anyone would ever need a co-signer, all demonstrated by deadbeat donnnie. Those , again, are facts. And my opinion is based on them. And you want to talk about anything but these facts, and everyone knows why, including you.It is your opinion that there is a cosigner with no actual evidence!
You hungry?Oh look, another whiny little cultist.... Dog on deadbeat Donnie, and they start nipping at your ankles ...Sounds like you getting food stamps in IndianaSo, the deadbeat was blacklisted. Deustche bank was stupid enough to lend to him. Then -- surprise!! -- the deadbeat defaulted on their loan.
Then, they lend him the money to pay themselves back, plus hundreds of millions more.
Yep, the deadbeat had a very rich co-signer. I wonder if the co-signer is actually the one making the loan payments? Deadbeat Donnie doesn't like writing checks.
So you admit no one has produced a lick of support for the allegation, that O'Donnell admits his story is unsubstantiated and he should not have stated it on air, and that even PMSNBC failed to validate a word of it but you ignore all that and buy it despite how absurd it is?No, of course. I just say it makes sense and is believable. And i argued why. Over and over and over. Then you ignore all of those points and ask this stupid fucking question? Come on.Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?
What evidence?I only stated that as some of the evidence that it makes sense...He has stated his evidence is that Trump refuses to show those papers...
So you admit no one has produced a lick of support for the allegation, that O'Donnell admits his story is unsubstantiated and he should not have stated it on air, and that even PMSNBC failed to validate a word of it but you ignore all that and buy it despite how absurd it is?No, of course. I just say it makes sense and is believable. And i argued why. Over and over and over. Then you ignore all of those points and ask this stupid fucking question? Come on.Have you seen any evidence that supports O'Donnell's allegation? Has anyone? Have other MSM outlets produced any?
Yeah ... your mind is totally gone.
In fact, the topic is O'Donnell's outrageous and unsubstantiated allegation and the IDIOTS who swallowed his fake news.Not part of my argument at all. This is trump cultism, trying hard to divert away from the topic.I mean the poster believe he or she has the right to see those papers
No, it makes no sense and does not seem even remotely believable to any rational adult.I absolutely do and agree 100% he should not have reported it.Do you not understand WHY ethical journalists never take the word of one "unnamed" source as factual until they verify the story with other sources?
Again...good god people, pay attention this time...i am saying i think it makes sense and that it is believable.
Do you disagree with that, or not?
I also think we will find out, either way.
No, it makes no sense and does not seem even remotely believable to any rational adult.I absolutely do and agree 100% he should not have reported it.Do you not understand WHY ethical journalists never take the word of one "unnamed" source as factual until they verify the story with other sources?
Again...good god people, pay attention this time...i am saying i think it makes sense and that it is believable.
Do you disagree with that, or not?
I also think we will find out, either way.
And there will never be any evidence produced in support of O'Donnell's claim. The man is a liar and a fraud as are his co-workers and PMSNBC.
You swallow.
I for one would apologize BUT it's so much like the sleezy scum we have in our WH now , I believe the worst about him until proven wrongUh...what? Only one person has knowledge of a co-signer? Where are you getting this nonsense? Are you saying that, because only one person leaked so far, only one person therefore knows? Tha. doesn't nake any sense.Thay is what them meant, and yet only ONE person has knowledge of a cosigner...
No, what I am saying is only one person is making the claim and those like you believe it because you need a win!
What happens if there is no Cosigner?
Will you apologize and say you were wrong or will you claim the Bank is covering it up to protect Trump?
Bullshit. MSLED most likely told O'Donnell to run the story. I'm sure they already had his retraction statement typed up before any of this sewage hit the airwaves.No, it makes no sense and does not seem even remotely believable to any rational adult.I absolutely do and agree 100% he should not have reported it.Do you not understand WHY ethical journalists never take the word of one "unnamed" source as factual until they verify the story with other sources?
Again...good god people, pay attention this time...i am saying i think it makes sense and that it is believable.
Do you disagree with that, or not?
I also think we will find out, either way.
And there will never be any evidence produced in support of O'Donnell's claim. The man is a liar and a fraud as are his co-workers and PMSNBC.
You swallow.
MSNBC itself should be credited for their quickness in saying the evidence was not solid at all.
O'Donnell like the Op'er and that poster will never admit that they need actual evidence to prove Trump has a cosigner and not their opinion and maybe one person that MSNBC does not believe...
That's because you're an idiot.I for one would apologize BUT it's so much like the sleezy scum we have in our WH now , I believe the worst about him until proven wrongUh...what? Only one person has knowledge of a co-signer? Where are you getting this nonsense? Are you saying that, because only one person leaked so far, only one person therefore knows? Tha. doesn't nake any sense.Thay is what them meant, and yet only ONE person has knowledge of a cosigner...
No, what I am saying is only one person is making the claim and those like you believe it because you need a win!
What happens if there is no Cosigner?
Will you apologize and say you were wrong or will you claim the Bank is covering it up to protect Trump?
So? Is that supposed to impress someone that the king of frivolous lawsuits might file a lawsuit?You keep believing that, a defamation suit is being drawn up. The Trumps have had enough of MSLSDs lies.
Most Americans think Trump is a failure.The job of the POTUS is to insure our security and American prosperity and he's done well on both counts. It is the lying MSM that tells you Trump is lying and you swallow. Very sad.Why should the press need any sources at all. The fat assed Trump says far worse things every fucking day. If no sources and outright lies are OK for the President of the United States, it should be good ernough for the press.
Do they have any other kind?Typical short-sighted, illogical liberal response.
Most Americans say they have lost trust in the media
