Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well you appear to have quite the vendetta and want to devote significant mental energy towards him. Enjoy.No coincidence
Fox is up to its armpits in the Dominion lawsuit and their secret emails are being released
What we are seeing is the hypocrisy of Carlson and how he really feels about Jan 6 and Trump himself
Ok, but what does that have to do with what I said?We Repubs all have conflicted opinions about Trump.
I'm not going to vote for Trump in the primary
However, if Trump wins the GOP nomination I will vote for him over any democrat.
5 scholarly screeds like that and he gets a bowl of rice from his thought leaders..... for 10, they add a can of cat food to make pilaf.....
Oh! That witticism ought to win you an award for sure!
Thanks for that thought provoking post.
.
"they"?And you know they are neo- fascists, Marxists and pederasts.....because FOX told you....
And so is the nation.
Even Republicans are acknowledging that Tucker is misrepresenting what happened on Jan 6Well you appear to have quite the vendetta and want to devote significant mental energy towards him. Enjoy.
Me? I’m glad to see more footage that the J6 committee saw but withheld, footage that clearly changes the narrative. If Tucker was the conduit for that to happen, fine by me.
It just seems like you’re mad video evidence was Released. Transparency is a good thing.
How will Tucker weasel out of this? The irony is so delicious - in his own words.
.Even Republicans are acknowledging that Tucker is misrepresenting what happened on Jan 6
Why do those who spend their lives studying the presidency take the opposite position?The only thing that I am conflicted about is whether he was in the top three Presidents of all time or only the top 5.
.Are they his own words, or someone saying what his words were?
Internal correspondence revealed in the course of Discovery..Are they his own words, or someone saying what his words were?
Clearly you must not have read it..
It's a CNN article.
.
.
It's a CNN article.
.
Grifty & his Rubes against The World..
I think you meant to type "Uniparty-ists".
.
Internal correspondence revealed in the course of Discovery..
Catch up.
No...the answer isSo the answer is it's someone who heard someone else say a thing about a statement in a place said by someone that could have been Tucker.
Got it.
Why do those who spend their lives studying the presidency take the opposite position?
If not the worst, certainly in the bottom 5..
You're just stating the obvious. Nothing profound about a magaturd. Back to your bubble.Lefties are too dim-witted to understand that it is possible to politically support someone whom you find personally repulsive. And this is ironic because virtually all of today's Democrat "leaders" are personally repulsive...Pelosi, Biden, Schiff, Schumer, Clinton, Harris, and on and on.
There are armies of Trump supporters who would want no part of "having a beer" with him. He just happens to be the first President in our lifetime who actually "gets it." He understands the evil of unchecked illegal immigration, the Deep State, the corrupt MSM, and the Washington swamp. He understands that the Global Warming hysteria is nothing but a cover for Leftist dreams of a political take-over of the world.
That's good enough for me.
His own wordsAre they his own words, or someone saying what his words were?
No...they've been entered into court record.Someone talking about the documents, not releasing them, right?
Again, probably 3rd level hearsay at worst, or willful manipulation of the statement at best.
